EPTpoor aLive always has to face PuMa in each tournament, and also GanZi, lmao ! (his worst and his best TvT opponents respectively)
Liquid teamkill is also a quite common scenario, lol
[MLG] Full Lineup for the MLG Summer Championship - Page 26
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
yungSC2
20 Posts
poor aLive always has to face PuMa in each tournament, and also GanZi, lmao ! (his worst and his best TvT opponents respectively) Liquid teamkill is also a quite common scenario, lol | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
On August 23 2012 14:43 Sub40APM wrote: MarineKing? Am I missreading the group stages or is he not coming? Open bracket yo, his seeding got lost cuz he didn't play in qualifiers or summer arena. | ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
 2012 MLG Pro Circuit/Summer/ChampionshipI am assuming that MLG will stick to the format presented here, though with the planned Friday night KeSPA extravaganza gone, who knows what will happen... Edit: Also note that the exact insertion procedure for the eight OWB players has not been published (the 1-8 labeling has nothing to do with seeding). All that has been posted is that they will be re-seeded 25-32 in the order of their respective Open Bracket seeds. | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
| ||
|
stephenrau
468 Posts
On August 23 2012 13:29 Dodgin wrote: 3 of the representatives of Korea for WCS Asia are Kespa players, that's out of 7 of them who were in the tournament...I wouldn't call it a fluke at all. I have a good grip on reality, all you have to do is look at the liquipedia brackets and see how well they did. It's a lot better than winning one bo3. I tallied the results thus far in Korea WCS and the overall record is 16-9 !! (36-28 in games) in favor of KESPA vs GSL. That's pretty staggering for BO3s. Even excluding the pitiful play of Yugioh, victims include DRG, Leenock, and Gumiho. I personally think the elephant thing with 300 BW players dominating is a load of crap, but GSL code S could certainly have at least half kespa in short order based on current progress. Kespa zergs look extremely strong except versus protoss, and By.Sun looks awesome as well. | ||
|
stephenrau
468 Posts
On August 23 2012 14:56 jobber123rd wrote: Group Brackets on Liquipedia: 2012 MLG Pro Circuit/Summer/ChampionshipI am assuming that MLG will stick to the format presented here, though with the planned Friday night KeSPA extravaganza gone, who knows what will happen... Edit: Also note that the exact insertion procedure for the eight OWB players has not been published (the 1-8 labeling has nothing to do with seeding). All that has been posted is that they will be re-seeded 25-32 in the order of their respective Open Bracket seeds. WOW if those brackets are accurate, there should be a shitstorm because the top seeds get screwed by playing the super strong open bracket winners rather than the super weak non-Kespa last second seeds. | ||
|
Balfazar
Australia483 Posts
| ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
On August 23 2012 10:48 Thobrik wrote: Where the hell are my swedes?!? Shape up ffs, and we dare to call ourselves little Korea! im sorry but im afraid almost every progamer in sweden is without a team at this moment ^^; on a sidenote how were the bottom 4 seeds chosen? | ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
On August 23 2012 15:25 MorroW wrote: im sorry but im afraid almost every progamer in sweden is without a team at this moment ^^; on a sidenote how were the bottom 4 seeds chosen? qxc is one of the two Championship entrants who was eliminated in Losers Round 1 of the Summer Arena (Sheth is the other one). The last three players had the best finish in the Invite-Only Online Qualifiers among those who did not play in the Arena. MLG had to reach down that far because 11 of the bottom 16 Arena players could not make it to Raleigh -- including (from round 2) SaSe, SorOf, Cytoplasm, Welmu, and TOP, as well as (from round 1) roof, Tefel, Golden, ReaL, Dream, and Snute. | ||
|
GoodNewsJim
United States122 Posts
-CrazyJimLiZarD | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
On August 23 2012 15:25 MorroW wrote: im sorry but im afraid almost every progamer in sweden is without a team at this moment ^^; on a sidenote how were the bottom 4 seeds chosen? Just get Ikea to sponsor you for god's sake. You know they want to | ||
|
Zax19
Czech Republic1136 Posts
 . | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On August 23 2012 14:44 LuckyFool wrote: Open bracket yo, his seeding got lost cuz he didn't play in qualifiers or summer arena. Ah. Thanks. Cool, I hope he can tough through so many games. Still kind of strange to see some of the seeded players while poor old MKP has to grind it out. | ||
|
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
| ||
|
Nomzter
Sweden2802 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
| ||
|
Greenei
Germany1754 Posts
| ||
|
Petrone
Sweden47 Posts
| ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
On August 23 2012 20:31 Petrone wrote: It's not just koreans missing I feel like it is used to be more filled with europeans. I think that if they want more europeans and more koreans they have to make it more forgiving not to miss a summer arena or whatever. I just feel like the gap between EU and NA has gotten even bigger with names like Idra and HuK not getting the results lately, besides them there isn't much talent to hype I feel. Ofc there is Suppy and maybe Scarlett but if you look at the EU scene I feel they have like dozens of similar up and coming players which in my opinion are much better. I'm disappointed at the lack of players from outside NA, just look at TSL4 for an example wasn't it just Major who qualified from NA into the last 32 players ( I think it was something like 15 koreans, 16 europeans and then Major?). I think the current lineup of players will give MLG less good games, but I hope I am proven wrong. If you look at it from a worldwide persepective, there's WCS (Korea), OSL, Proleague, and Campus Party all drawing attention and talent away from this weekend's MLG (and WCS KR prelims were in direct conflict with Summer Arena), so of course there's going to be a weaker international lineup. Hopefully, Dallas will be better in that regard. | ||
| ||
