|
On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that.
It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no?
|
this guy needs to get kicked the tourny, banned from all events and then get his account blocked by blizzard.
unacceptable
|
On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no?
My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately.
|
i think there are a few more hackers in WCS USA, which makes me sad. wish i had proof to show
|
He's IMNesTea? Wondered who that Zerg was with such sick record, died immediately to my first hellions. Blizzard should act.
|
On June 07 2012 02:57 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no? My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately.
Understood. Things have been kind of wonky lately.
|
Stop complaining. Think about it. Why are pro's not accused of "Hacking"
There is a difference between a good player and an idiot hacking and trying to hide it
|
That blink hacks... Only funny thing is the random stalker blinking out into the roaches in game 2 (probably becasue the badly coded blinkhack couldn't find space to blink away from the incoming fire due to his army being in the way.). Well, Blizzard, maybe it is time you hire a team of really talented programmers to dedicate themselves 100% time on anti hack...
|
Have the idiots at Blizzard already dignified us with a response?
Maybe in 2 days we find out that Warden 2 will be included with HotS, like resume from replay and all the other shit we should've had from the start if Activision didn't actively hate gamers.
|
Maybe on the main website there will be a announcement about cheaters etc...
|
On June 07 2012 03:01 BoZiffer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 02:57 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no? My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately. Understood. Things have been kind of wonky lately.
Yeah, it happens. I'm getting tired of this, myself, haha.
Also, turns out Avilo was wrong.
|
On June 07 2012 03:11 zoid wrote:
That blink hacks... Only funny thing is the random stalker blinking out into the roaches in game 2 (probably becasue the badly coded blinkhack couldn't find space to blink away from the incoming fire due to his army being in the way.). Well, Blizzard, maybe it is time you hire a team of really talented programmers to dedicate themselves 100% time on anti hack...
I actually don't think you can code a hack to recognize incoming fire. I mean, don't fool yourself, let alone the fact that someone managed to code auto-recognization of low health and then trigger an event at the same time is beyond my knowledge of coding. It's like really, really sophisticated and the beginning of a new, more advanced era of hacking, I'm afraid.
|
On June 07 2012 03:20 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 03:01 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:57 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no? My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately. Understood. Things have been kind of wonky lately. Yeah, it happens. I'm getting tired of this, myself, haha. Also, turns out Avilo was wrong.
I saw that. *Sigh* I'm with you, I'm growing very tired of the whole thing. Someone will eventually prove something, or someone won't. And you know what, the world will still be spinning...until the Mayans GG all of us. LOL.
|
On June 07 2012 03:21 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 03:11 zoid wrote:
That blink hacks... Only funny thing is the random stalker blinking out into the roaches in game 2 (probably becasue the badly coded blinkhack couldn't find space to blink away from the incoming fire due to his army being in the way.). Well, Blizzard, maybe it is time you hire a team of really talented programmers to dedicate themselves 100% time on anti hack... I actually don't think you can code a hack to recognize incoming fire. I mean, don't fool yourself, let alone the fact that someone managed to code auto-recognization of low health and then trigger an event at the same time is beyond my knowledge of coding. It's like really, really sophisticated and the beginning of a new, more advanced era of hacking, I'm afraid.
Hi ToiletCat, the blink hack is really prominent recently and was used by the fake oGsMC on American Ladder not long ago. AiRSirRobin has proven this hack in his game on Antiga Shipyard where oGsMC does not have any of his stalkers selected and yet was blinking damaged stalkers right before getting killed, with yet 600+ apms. Like I said, no protoss pro-gamer can have 600+ apms. And the only way to achieve 500+ apm (after the non-stop apm patch) is be play zerg and select 300 speedlings and morph them into banelings, then it's the only way to have 500 let alone 600+ apms. Also to note, in order to blink, you need to select individual stalkers... It's not humanely possible to blink stalkers that are not selected.
And if anyone thinks they can blink injured stalkers without ever selecting them and have 600+ apm, please show it to me at MLG Anaheim. Thanks.
|
On June 07 2012 03:28 BoZiffer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 03:20 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 03:01 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:57 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:On June 07 2012 01:51 roym899 wrote:
Well it's funny that there are no guys here saying this guy doesn't hack and this is no evidence like in the Spades hacking thread, because it's pretty much the same. Because it's obvious he is hacking.. Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no? My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately. Understood. Things have been kind of wonky lately. Yeah, it happens. I'm getting tired of this, myself, haha. Also, turns out Avilo was wrong. I saw that. *Sigh* I'm with you, I'm growing very tired of the whole thing. Someone will eventually prove something, or someone won't. And you know what, the world will still be spinning...until the Mayans GG all of us. LOL.
Trying to sound "deep" ?
|
On June 07 2012 03:31 Chakoi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 03:28 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 03:20 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 03:01 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:57 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:55 BoZiffer wrote:On June 07 2012 02:53 toiletCAT wrote:On June 07 2012 02:44 mememolly wrote:On June 07 2012 02:25 roym899 wrote:On June 07 2012 01:53 Chakoi wrote:
[quote]
Because it's obvious he is hacking..
Why would anyone be defending him? Well this is off topic, but: Spades hacking is obvious, too? btt: I really wonder what Blizz is gonna do about this. I think it's impossible for them not to act as those hacking discussion lately is really detroying the game... I agree with you, the spade's evidence is pretty conclusive, moving the army perfectly when he has no vision and the camera locks and the perfect builds and positioning of units when he doesn't scout shit - spades was beyond reasonable doubt You are as complicated as anyone could possibly be, aren't you mememolly? You of all the people should learn from this thread -- SniXSniPe has presented conclusive proof of that his opponent is hacking, by showing us a replay, in which his opponent is literally issueing commands without clicking on his keyboard. This is the definition of conclusive proof, mememolly, do you understand this? Are you starting to understand what everyone has been telling you? You have NOTHING but CLAIMS and SUSPICION when it comes to Spades, absolutely nothing but that. It looks like Avilo just found some concrete evidence if you go check the other thread but we should probably keep the Spades talk in the Spades thread, no? My post was not about Spades himself but about the fact that mememolly thinks that auto-Blinking Stalkers are totally not proof, but questionable decision-making is. People like her/him is making life on TL really, really weird as of lately. Understood. Things have been kind of wonky lately. Yeah, it happens. I'm getting tired of this, myself, haha. Also, turns out Avilo was wrong. I saw that. *Sigh* I'm with you, I'm growing very tired of the whole thing. Someone will eventually prove something, or someone won't. And you know what, the world will still be spinning...until the Mayans GG all of us. LOL. Trying to sound "deep" ?
Naw... I did think about referencing a song or something but... I'm retarded.
|
Email Blizzard or something. We can't have hackers in tournaments. Dude needs to be banned.
|
ITT: people freaking out over NOTHING. Literally NOTHING.
Ball don't lie. The guy will go and get beaten and then he will leave. Zero controversy, zero problem. I just wish this thread would die. It serves no purpose.
|
On June 06 2012 08:22 Mortality wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:17 Psychobabas wrote:
Dear OP,
I don't understand. Every day in society I see people who couldn't care less about other people. Couldn't care less about his neighbor the unemployed, the disabled, even the thief. Somebody shouts "help" and people pretend they don't hear. Boss threatens them with illegal unpaid overtime and they nod silently.
But now I see so much enthusiasm about a hacker across the ocean playing a RTS.
How come I see so much interest to set things right. Why isn't this attitude reflected even as a small percentage in every day living?
I really wonder about this. You never hear about similar things like this in the "real world". It's all about mind your own business. I'm genuinely puzzled. Is it the safety of the internet? What is it? ? That's got to be the worst argument I've ever heard. We should ignore somebody cheating and receiving a prize (free ticket + hotel) worth hundreds of dollars handed to him because there are bigger problems in the world? Ignoring this problem isn't going to make other problems go away. FAIL logic is FAIL.
You completely and utterly missed his point.
Your ignorance is truly astounding
|
On June 07 2012 03:54 jeeeeohn wrote:
ITT: people freaking out over NOTHING. Literally NOTHING.
Ball don't lie. The guy will go and get beaten and then he will leave. Zero controversy, zero problem. I just wish this thread would die. It serves no purpose.
If it continues it's going to affect starcraft 2 future + esports..
So stfu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
