Also, just a small question: Why cap the replays a user can upload to one? Wouldn't it be better for the study if a single user could upload as many as five replays?
SkillCraft.ca: A SC2 Expertise Study - Page 7
Forum Index > SC2 General |
http://skillcraft.ca/ -- Go go TL, time to unite and help out! Fill it in and tell your friends! | ||
StateSC2
Korea (South)621 Posts
Also, just a small question: Why cap the replays a user can upload to one? Wouldn't it be better for the study if a single user could upload as many as five replays? | ||
CrushDog5
Canada207 Posts
On August 24 2011 08:29 State wrote: Why cap the replays a user can upload to one? Wouldn't it be better for the study if a single user could upload as many as five replays? Good question, we debated the decision heavily. There are several reasons: First, we though that making it easy for people was very important. This study is the first of it's kind, and we thought we'd get a better response if it was simple to do. As it turned out, only half the people that do the study complete all three steps. If we had required multiple replays, it might be even less. Second, having multiple replays, and particularly different numbers of replays from each person, creates a scenario which is more difficult to analyze for statistical reasons. Because we have never done a mass replay study, we were reluctant to add more complexity to the analysis. Third, because we are interested primarily in identify league characteristics, rather than individual player characteristics, it can be better to get fewer games from more players. If we have some success with this project, we will likely do followups where players submit many games over the course of a long time. We'll have better measures of individual progress, in that case. Thanks for participating, and please spread the word. The more participants, the better. | ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
skipgamer
Australia701 Posts
edit: after doing it, I'm very very very intrigued as to how they will be interpreting the data. There were some pretty (seemingly) unrelevant questions. | ||
SoKHo
Korea (South)1081 Posts
| ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
wakelife
Canada3 Posts
| ||
robih
Austria1086 Posts
i guess there aren't many low tier players here on TL | ||
Strike_
Netherlands704 Posts
| ||
Primadog
United States4411 Posts
| ||
jarrydesque
584 Posts
| ||
skipgamer
Australia701 Posts
On September 06 2011 03:12 robih wrote: done i guess there aren't many low tier players here on TL I reckon there are a lot of fans of e-sports in general that lurk here or haven't bothered to create an account that I'm sure would be more than happy to participate! The only thing is a topic needs a good bump to catch their attention. They might miss things that the people who check TL every 5 minutes see. ![]() | ||
Haegr9599
United States210 Posts
| ||
Erzz
Canada184 Posts
| ||
ForeverSleep
Canada920 Posts
| ||
TeeBee
United Kingdom17 Posts
| ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
On September 06 2011 03:14 Primadog wrote: Wow, endorsed by Beyonder. Whatever you're doing, you're doing it right. TL unified the community, TL can contribute to science FOR ESPORTS!!! | ||
[wh]_ForAlways
United States235 Posts
| ||
10or10
Sweden517 Posts
gl hf! | ||
Jizzy
United Kingdom45 Posts
| ||
| ||