EU or NA ladder, which is harder? - Page 13
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Nabes
Canada1800 Posts
| ||
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
| ||
AKomrade
United States582 Posts
| ||
imMUTAble787
United States680 Posts
On June 04 2012 09:20 pallad wrote: Look at title.. "EU or NA ladder, which is harder?" Where do you see KR? . TL is community site , you gonna come to every thread and write stop arguing ....? *woosh* You're right, man. EU is so vastly superior. Maybe one day NA can get on EU's level. LOL | ||
Chilling5pr33
Germany518 Posts
Poll: Is EU and NA equal in skill? NO (47) YES (20) 67 total votes Your vote: Is EU and NA equal in skill? Only if you say NO you should answer in the Poll at the beginning ^^ silly OP Trying to splitt the community? | ||
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
"Are you from NA/EU" ? | ||
MrCash
United States1504 Posts
On June 04 2012 10:09 zezamer wrote: You should rename your poll "Are you from NA/EU" ? This poll is over a year old, and might have been true back then. It might be worth locking this thread, as there is nothing relevant today that can be discussed based of OPs post/poll. I'm masters on both and can tell you that the skill is extremely similar, but meta-game and play styles by race do vary quite a bit. From my experience Protoss on EU cheese and all in much more than on NA, and vice-versa for Zerg. The Terran strategies are more diverse on EU, lots of people copy GSL stuff. Overall though, very similar skill levels. | ||
Above and Beyond
1 Post
| ||
plasemeious
United States244 Posts
On June 04 2012 10:19 Above and Beyond wrote: haha I gotta go with EU here. im sure if Stephano even ate or touched american food he would go on a big losing streak We will find out at MLG since he is staying with EG | ||
-Switch-
Canada506 Posts
On June 04 2012 07:55 Kaitokid wrote: if you are good enough you will eventually hit GM, on NA you can be worse but still hit GM thats my point. its simply easier to reach GM MMR on NA because there are less good players You are correct. | ||
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
ZeromuS
Canada13378 Posts
On June 04 2012 11:16 Pokebunny wrote: I think they're pretty close now with a lot of koreans playing on NA. I find the average level of low GM / high master players on EU to be lower too. The way I see it is as follows: There are more good players on EU who are professionals compared to NA. Or at least, when I watch a stream it seems to me that the variability in matchmaking is lower meaning that the games on ladder are often more close and meaningful and strategies more varied on the EU ladder. However, for all the NORMAL people who play this game for fun and aren't semi-pro or pro, the difference means nothing to us. This is why I hate these stupid threads. People come in here and say Im on EU, EU is harder, Im masters EU im better than masters NA. No. I am sorry but no. The people on top of ladder in EU and NA can trade games for the most part. Its not the same as top of KR vs top of NA or EU. But at the same time at mid masters, at diamond, at plat at almost any level the difference between NA and EU is minimal. Sure, there might be more high end players on EU who play seriously and professionally but that doesn't mean the EU ladder is magically 100x better than NA. Im pretty sure plat on KR isn't so so so much better than everyone on NA or EU either. The myth that KR plats are 1000x better is probably helped by not high level players getting a KR account and having some 500ms ping to deal with which makes it harder to perform well. While being masters in NA doesn't mean you are masters in KR, it doesn't mean you are plat either. I think people need to stop worrying about the ladder and their ranking and start focusing on just enjoying the game. | ||
Josh_rakoons
United Kingdom1158 Posts
| ||
emis
Estonia409 Posts
I've played ~100 games on US, laddered two accounts from placements to masters and I can say that EU is quite a lot stronger from until the early leagues. Another solid conclusion is that there's A TON more cheese on NA. Other than these things, ladder is ladder, you will get practice anyways unless your the best in your region. | ||
KingFool
Canada428 Posts
| ||
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
On June 04 2012 15:38 emis wrote: People who are saying that the difference is only at GM level are either Americans or haven't actually played on the other server. I've played ~100 games on US, laddered two accounts from placements to masters and I can say that EU is quite a lot stronger from until the early leagues. Another solid conclusion is that there's A TON more cheese on NA. Other than these things, ladder is ladder, you will get practice anyways unless your the best in your region. This has very little relevance. On the KR server you will encounter lots of cheese as well. | ||
furerkip
United States439 Posts
On June 04 2012 15:38 emis wrote: I've played ~100 games on US, laddered two accounts from placements to masters and I can say that EU is quite a lot stronger from until the early leagues. Are you masters/facing masters in EU? If so, isn't just working as intended... You already have the skill level of a master's player, ergo you should end up on masters if both regions are similar in skill. If you started at placement, means you had to be playing mostly diamonds and then masters, which should be easy for you since you are a higher level player than diamond. | ||
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
On June 04 2012 09:20 pallad wrote: Look at title.. "EU or NA ladder, which is harder?" Where do you see KR? . TL is community site , you gonna come to every thread and write stop arguing ....? His point is, why do we care which ladder is 2nd best and 3rd best? lol. | ||
Thune
Austria129 Posts
i wouldnt say the difference is too big but there is definately a difference | ||
TT1
Canada9975 Posts
On June 04 2012 08:58 Corsica wrote: It would go so bad for NA had they made one more showmatch like that... find someone to sponsor the event and well see what about that :+) | ||
| ||