EPTIn foresight of 1.2: Standardized chat channels - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
vectorix108
United States4633 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
| ||
|
darthcaesar
United States475 Posts
On January 12 2011 15:42 Froadac wrote: We need multiple TL generals it would appear. TLGeneral2 etc etc? In PTR it automatically made new numbered channels if one was full. Fail blizz. 100 person limit is dumb. Yeah, I think if a channel is full, add a number. I added that to the OP. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
hiyo_bye
United States737 Posts
I know, I know, off topic. but what a small world! | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
On January 12 2011 16:23 travis wrote: TL Cyber: self explanatory wanna practice Backdoor Nydus worm harass? | ||
|
darthcaesar
United States475 Posts
On January 12 2011 17:10 hiyo_bye wrote: oh my god, it's darkcaesar, my new best friend from the root gaming channel (I'm pirifius). Remember, we both answered a guys question at the same time with the same answer, but we each had our answer displayed first, and we both say "I win" at the same time I know, I know, off topic. but what a small world! YO I make this thread. sup. Also, it is good to see these channels start to get populated ^^ | ||
|
FlamingTurd
United States1059 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
|
rS.Sinatra
Canada785 Posts
if i only have one person in a chat tab, i must go to my right panel and scroll through my 300 person friend list to find my friend to invite him to the game instead of right clicking his name in the "hidden" tab on the right hand side... this is very gay and i urge blizzard to bring it back please | ||
|
thehitman
1105 Posts
Popular team chat channels had about 100 people at any time and it would have been stupid if they were transferred to team channel 2. The channel OP should decide what number of people they are going to allow, whether its 20, 50, 100 or 500. | ||
|
Aldehyde
Sweden939 Posts
HAHA! Almost makes me able to live through this wait on the EU server. | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On January 12 2011 16:17 darthcaesar wrote: In PTR it automatically made new numbered channels if one was full. Fail blizz. 100 person limit is dumb. Yeah, I think if a channel is full, add a number. I added that to the OP. Making multiple TL generals instead of splitting it up by themes would be terrible imo - because what if, say, I'd like to join in at a discussion with people sitting around in TLGeneral1....but this channel is already full and half of the people there are just looking for (competent) 2v2 allys. I also think Chill underestimates the popularity of TL, a limit of 100 is nothing, I predict full channels all the time, at the very least in the first couple of weeks from now on. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4329 Posts
| ||
|
LLuke
Austria228 Posts
On January 12 2011 17:44 thehitman wrote: I actually think that 100 people is too little. WC3 6 years after it was released had more than 300 people in the general chat channel. Actually Warcraft 3 Channels had a limitation of 40 if I remember correctly. | ||
|
Robo-boogey
Australia110 Posts
(That, or I joined but am the only person online. I am a chat channel noob.) | ||
|
KezseN
Singapore1450 Posts
I guess these little things are an excuse for blizzard to make patching seem, for lack of better term "important". | ||
|
Deltablazy
Canada580 Posts
| ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
Is something like that planned? | ||
| ||
