Real names in forums canceled - Page 4
Forum Index > SC2 General |
shieldbreak
United States406 Posts
| ||
NR
Romania109 Posts
![]() | ||
Tone_
United Kingdom554 Posts
| ||
vic_gn
Austria50 Posts
| ||
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
Do the battle.net team even use their brain and actually think about ideas before deciding to implement them? five seconds of thought would have told them that this would never have worked - just running the idea by one female staff member would probably have saved them to be honest. | ||
Spidermonkey
United States251 Posts
On July 10 2010 02:11 Kashmir wrote: ...for now. Maybe I'm just the suspicious type but the whole fiasco sure hasn't left me trusting them much. I'm thinking the same. Yea they revoked a stupid idea... but now we are embracing them with loving arms? I simply don't trust that the people making the user settings decissions for Blizzard know what the hell they are doing anymore. | ||
Senorcuidado
United States700 Posts
| ||
Sergeras
Bulgaria185 Posts
On July 10 2010 02:15 Archerofaiur wrote: ![]() | ||
JHancho
United States166 Posts
Still not sure what prompted the proposed change, other than a lack of foresight and the promise of money. Still, I applaud that it was reversed. | ||
Lysis
United States147 Posts
| ||
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
All they need to do is force you to post on your highest level character or-- if you have multiple max levels-- you can pick one. All the trolling they must have to moderate due to level one alts must be insane. Edit: Someone with access to WoW/Blizzard forums should post this as a suggestion. :D | ||
Schnake
Germany2819 Posts
Still, this won't be the last time the community will be faced with similar issues. It seems to me as you really need blunt force to hammer feedback into Blizzard's exec heads. To me it seems extremely unlikely that they DID NOT expect a backlash like this. Maybe they calculated that it would not have been such a big deal. Seriously, every big company does at least a little bit of market/marketing research in order to prevent PR disasters like this. But let's just wait and see with which good or bad ideas they will come up with next... we believe that the powerful communications functionality enabled by Real ID, such as cross-game and cross-realm chat, make Battle.net a great place for players to stay connected to real-life friends and family while playing Blizzard games. | ||
NeoLearner
Belgium1847 Posts
| ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
On July 10 2010 02:16 Tone_ wrote: Awesome. Now let's re-start ultra-rage about cross-realm play and chat channels! Yeah, if you can get a bunch of major news organizations to report on the monumental disappointment of SC2 lacking chat channels and cross-realm play during beta, you might be onto something. Otherwise save your energy | ||
Lighioana
Norway466 Posts
Where were we? Ah... CHAT CHANNELS! | ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Too bad he has to report to Activision staff.. | ||
PaterSin
Germany301 Posts
| ||
QueueQueue
Canada1000 Posts
| ||
phrixus
China143 Posts
| ||
| ||