This is more then likely because wins are stored in more then 1 byte or whatever, so if the player has > 255 wins it doesn't work. Safe to assume that record is probably more like 269 - 207.

Yeah this.

Sorry I am slacking, there are a few bugs I need to fix (like the win/loss records not being accurate) and it needs to be updated for the latest patch. I plan on fixing it tomorrow but it's not the first time I've said that so no guarantees!

JiYan

United States3668 Posts

May 18 2010 05:35 GMT

#343

thanks for doing this gibybo, let us know when its fixed please ^^

iAmSoniK

Canada246 Posts

May 18 2010 05:40 GMT

#344

Good Job Gibybo ! its nice to see the full rankings.

Hopefully the updater starts working soon.

KillerPenguin

United States516 Posts

May 18 2010 08:34 GMT

#345

Gibybo u should definitely stop slacking and get this up! I'm sure thousands of people need it up, you could probably make some money with advertisements too. I'd be happy to help I have some time and a bit of programming experience.

Shenron

United States105 Posts

May 18 2010 10:36 GMT

#346

Wow. Thanks a bunch (:

Asta

Germany3491 Posts

May 19 2010 22:52 GMT

#347

Pretty please. ^^

Gibybo

United States229 Posts

May 19 2010 23:07 GMT

#348

I think patch 13 is coming out in the next 24 hours which may change it again so I'll start after it comes out so I don't have to do it twice :p

Wi)nD

Canada719 Posts

May 22 2010 05:25 GMT

#349

this gonna get re-set up for the new reset?

CynanMachae

Canada1459 Posts

May 22 2010 05:29 GMT

#350

Lol with no identifier and random divisions names this is gonna be such a pain in the ass to set this up...

Rantech

Chile527 Posts

May 29 2010 04:13 GMT

#351

So, now that the ladder 1st phase will end in 7th June, will you put an effort to update the data ?

i really hope so.

Dionyseus

United States2068 Posts

May 29 2010 06:53 GMT

#352

On May 29 2010 13:13 iloveeea wrote:
So, now that the ladder 1st phase will end in 7th June, will you put an effort to update the data ?

i really hope so.

How? Names aren't unique in this patch.

Gibybo

United States229 Posts

May 29 2010 09:57 GMT

#353

On May 22 2010 14:29 CynanMachae wrote:
Lol with no identifier and random divisions names this is gonna be such a pain in the ass to set this up...

Pretty much...

Gibybo

United States229 Posts

July 16 2010 09:29 GMT

#354

Well this update was long overdue, but starcraftrankings.com is now better than ever

In the next few days: 99% of all players on US and EU will be in the system (including all leagues). Updates will happen automatically every hour (and perhaps more frequently for the top players) with no client download required.

By SC2 release: 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4 will be included.

TheWoodLeagueAllstar

United Kingdom617 Posts

July 16 2010 10:24 GMT

#355

i love the ladder system and the sit ebut honestly im not sure i like people being able to look up my pofile, match history and all that. I do hope sc2 comes up with a private option.

StaR_Robo

Australia229 Posts

July 16 2010 10:44 GMT

#356

you can't see any details of your actual matches apart from the fact that you played them and either won or lost on the online information (in-game is obviously a different story). You don't even see who the opponent was

theonlyrio

United Kingdom200 Posts

July 16 2010 12:05 GMT

#357

yesh i love this site lol

great job man

Gibybo

United States229 Posts

July 17 2010 10:02 GMT

#358

Added a ton more data. Everyone in a 1v1 ladder silver league or higher on either the US or EU should show up. Let me know if you don't see someone (actually the EU script will be going for another 20 minutes or so from this post, so wait until then :p).

papaz

Sweden4149 Posts

July 17 2010 10:11 GMT

#359

I found something strange.

If I browse united states ranking it says WhiteRa is ranked 9.

If I search for WhiteRa it says he is ranked 7.

EDIT: Browsing on WhiteRa it says its updated 16 minutes ago. Searching for WhiteRa says it was updated 21 minutes ago. Probably thats the reason for different rankings.

Gibybo

United States229 Posts

July 17 2010 10:18 GMT

#360

Good catch.

I just turned on some more aggressive caching and it looks like it is causing some minor data integrity glitches

The ranks from search are pulled from cache, the ranks from browse are computed on demand (so they are probably more accurate). Looking into fixing the cache.