|
|
On September 10 2019 20:34 farvacola wrote: Ended up winning my fantasy matchup 193 to 139, my opponent stood no chance against Ekeler, Allen, Kamara, Mahomes, and even Engram. Gonna sub in Brady for Mahomes this week since the Pats are playing the Dolphins and Brown will be playing, good move? No. You have Mahomes, if he's healthy you're playing him every week, no questions asked.
|
Ya don’t think that ankle sprain is gonna inhibit his mobility?
|
It might, but for my money, if he's playing, you play him.
|
I'd play Brady against the phins because they are the phins. But historically they have given the pats some trouble, but fuck are they awful this year.
|
Well goddamn, now I’m torn, I’ll have to ruminate over what shakes out during the week I guess.
|
I think you sub in Brady against the Phins. He's going to put up some numbers that will look like a video game. Especially with AB and Gordon.
|
Brady and BB also have no chill. I expect them to get 100 points. That being said it is hard to ever pick against Mahomes. That being said you likely have the number 1 and 2 rated passer for the week so while it is a hard pick both picks are pretty awesome.
|
The issue that I see now, is if the players don't play. If the mass exodus out of Miami is to be believed, they might not have a full roster on the field. That could get the game canceled and then you're SOL.
Mahomes has a tweaked ankle so I'm kind of worried he might get sacked due to lack of mobility. So probably expect a lot of rushing from KC this week to give his ankle a bit of rest. I'm curious to see what the Ravens, Browns, Texans, and Steelers do going forward. Some balled out. Some flopped. Some have specific issues that need to be worked on. So I'm thinking a few of those teams will be close to what we can expect the rest of the season by end of Sunday.
|
On September 11 2019 01:01 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: The issue that I see now, is if the players don't play. If the mass exodus out of Miami is to be believed, they might not have a full roster on the field. That could get the game canceled and then you're SOL.
Mahomes has a tweaked ankle so I'm kind of worried he might get sacked due to lack of mobility. So probably expect a lot of rushing from KC this week to give his ankle a bit of rest. I'm curious to see what the Ravens, Browns, Texans, and Steelers do going forward. Some balled out. Some flopped. Some have specific issues that need to be worked on. So I'm thinking a few of those teams will be close to what we can expect the rest of the season by end of Sunday. Rams Saints will be the game to watch next week. Rematch of last years championships game before its this years championship game. Didn't really learn much from watching Mahomes beat a backup QB's backup
Top 5 teams right now 1. Ravens 2. Patriots 3. Saints 4. Rams 5. Chargers
Someone needs to tell the Atlanta falcons they have a MVP QB and the best receiver in the league
AB could end up being better than Moss when he was in NE b/b Moss was passed his prime when he joined the Pats
|
Sleeping on the Boys, vikes and the chiefs! And Saints, Rams and Charges just barely squeaked out wins.
I also think ravens are too high, because who knows they crushed, but it was against the worst team of the century.
|
On September 11 2019 01:48 JimmiC wrote: Sleeping on the Boys, vikes and the chiefs! And Saints, Rams and Charges just barely squeaked out wins.
I also think ravens are too high, because who knows they crushed, but it was against the worst team of the century. Vikings Qb completed 8 passes, not impressed. I would have put Chiefs 5 but they lost against the Rams last year and the Chiefs still had Kareem Hunt. The Saints and Rams and Chargers also faced tougher competition so that's my reasoning.
|
On September 11 2019 01:56 redlightdistrict wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2019 01:48 JimmiC wrote: Sleeping on the Boys, vikes and the chiefs! And Saints, Rams and Charges just barely squeaked out wins.
I also think ravens are too high, because who knows they crushed, but it was against the worst team of the century. Vikings Qb completed 8 passes, not impressed. I would have put Chiefs 5 but they lost against the Rams last year and the Chiefs still had Kareem Hunt. The Saints and Rams and Chargers also faced tougher competition so that's my reasoning. 8 out of 10, why throw when you are gashing them with everyrun play and your D is stuffing them? You speed up the clock and control the game to stop the former MVP QB and top wideout in football.
That being said none of your top 5 is crazy, and power rankings are just for fun, but it is also more fun to argue about them than agree on them =-)
|
On September 11 2019 02:10 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2019 01:56 redlightdistrict wrote:On September 11 2019 01:48 JimmiC wrote: Sleeping on the Boys, vikes and the chiefs! And Saints, Rams and Charges just barely squeaked out wins.
I also think ravens are too high, because who knows they crushed, but it was against the worst team of the century. Vikings Qb completed 8 passes, not impressed. I would have put Chiefs 5 but they lost against the Rams last year and the Chiefs still had Kareem Hunt. The Saints and Rams and Chargers also faced tougher competition so that's my reasoning. 8 out of 10, why throw when you are gashing them with everyrun play and your D is stuffing them? You speed up the clock and control the game to stop the former MVP QB and top wideout in football. That being said none of your top 5 is crazy, and power rankings are just for fun, but it is also more fun to argue about them than agree on them =-) maybe im contradicting myself by having the Ravens 1 when they were playing the worst team but i will freely admit i didn't think Lamar could throw, and i was pleasantly surprised. KC is saying Hill and Mahomes are kinda gimped so im half expecting KC vs Raiders to be halfway competitive
|
Pats send DT to the jets for a 6th, great move for the jets and the pats had no space at this point. It shows tehy don't fear the jets either (not that they should) lol
|
|
United States97248 Posts
|
The timing of this is just...not...kosher.
|
this whole rape story sounds very...Rueben Fosterish. Multiple accusations over a period of years just to file suit right after he signs a contract.
Hill is out 4-6 weeks
|
On September 11 2019 23:43 redlightdistrict wrote: this whole rape story sounds very...Rueben Fosterish. Multiple accusations over a period of years just to file suit right after he signs a contract.
Hill is out 4-6 weeks He just got out of a much bigger contract. No need for tinfoil hats. It could be false, but doing it now makes less sense than last week based on his contract.
|
Depends really. It could be someone from the Raiders trying to tarnish him because he played them so bad. I'll wait for more, but the timing just doesn't vibe.
|
|
|
|