EPTOn May 14 2019 00:21 sharkie wrote:
well then take a bet if you are so sure of yourself
well then take a bet if you are so sure of yourself
What stakes?
I would bet that City get >95 points and Liverpool get <95
2018 - 2019 Football Thread - Page 231
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9707 Posts
What stakes? I would bet that City get >95 points and Liverpool get <95 | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1973 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On May 14 2019 00:21 sharkie wrote: well then take a bet if you are so sure of yourself No idea what we could bet but I'll predict City finishing ahead Liverpool sure On May 14 2019 01:26 Bacillus wrote: L’Equipe thinks Hazard is going to Real Madrid for 100 million euros. I've got no idea how reliable source that is. Still to high for only 1 year on a 30 year old, but at least its not the 130m Chelsea fans were babbling about | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28696 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On May 14 2019 01:58 sneirac wrote: No idea what we could bet but I'll predict City finishing ahead Liverpool sure Still to high for only 1 year on a 30 year old, but at least its not the 130m Chelsea fans were babbling about thats the normal price nowadays, hazard is half a neymar, seems about right | ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On May 14 2019 02:04 zev318 wrote: thats the normal price nowadays, hazard is half a neymar, seems about right Except neymar was 24 not 30 and had 4 years on his contract not 1, and it was of course a release clause. I'm not denying the market is nuts and I would call 100m low for Hazard if there was more than one year left in his contract. | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On May 14 2019 02:09 sneirac wrote: Except neymar was 24 not 30 and had 4 years on his contract not 1, and it was of course a release clause. I'm not denying the market is nuts and I would call 100m low for Hazard if there was more than one year left in his contract. well that's why he's half a neymar, he's older and contract remaining was not as long. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18085 Posts
On May 14 2019 02:13 zev318 wrote: well that's why he's half a neymar, he's older and contract remaining was not as long. Seems about right: Neymar: 200m for a 4 year contract buyout. Hazard: have to buy off a quarter of that contract, so 50m. However, he's also only half the drama queen that Neymar is, so double the price. 100m. Seems fair. | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28696 Posts
that actually is quite a bit different from 30 when it comes to pricing him. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
This guy is Tier 1 for all things Belgium and has been way ahead of most on this saga. The Perez mouthpiece last week stated €130 million but he says his source says no fee has been agreed yet. All we know is Hazard wants to go there if the club let him and Real seemingly want him. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
An investigation into accusations that Premier League champion Manchester City misled European soccer’s financial regulators in pursuit of its success on the field is expected to recommend that the team be barred from the Champions League, European soccer’s richest competition and the trophy the club covets most. English soccer authorities and officials at UEFA, European soccer’s governing body and the organizer of the Champions League, have for months been investigating Manchester City amid allegations of rule-breaking revealed in damaging leaks over much of the past year. Members of the investigatory chamber of UEFA’s financial control board, a group set up to analyze the accounts of clubs suspected of breaking strict cost-control regulations, met two weeks ago in Nyon, Switzerland, to finalize their conclusions. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/sports/manchester-city-champions-league-uefa.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes Shocker. | ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
On May 14 2019 02:23 Acrofales wrote: Seems about right: Neymar: 200m for a 4 year contract buyout. Hazard: have to buy off a quarter of that contract, so 50m. However, he's also only half the drama queen that Neymar is, so double the price. 100m. Seems fair. Well to be more accurate we have to factor in time decay as well, so it's probably less than a quarter. Agree on the math for drama queen. But you should also count that hazard is a better player than neymar  works out 100m seem fair to me | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On May 14 2019 04:04 Pandemona wrote: L'Equipe is way off the mark, fee not even close to being agreed, L'Equipe is only reliable for stuff involving France. This guy is Tier 1 for all things Belgium and has been way ahead of most on this saga. The Perez mouthpiece last week stated €130 million but he says his source says no fee has been agreed yet. All we know is Hazard wants to go there if the club let him and Real seemingly want him. https://twitter.com/HLNinEngeland/status/1127950152155705344 I dont need L'Equipe to know Hazard is as good as gone this summer. And frankly I dont care how much and I dont think Real will either. They want him, they will get him. On May 14 2019 00:59 Jockmcplop wrote: What stakes? I would bet that City get >95 points and Liverpool get <95 i think he wouldve just taken you on title bets. Getting 95+ points season in season out isnt normal. Both teams will regress a bit. I reckon low 90s for City at nest and mid to high 80 for Liverpool would be a more realistic estimate. Thats a bit on the conservative side but I think thats fairer. You can never really tell at this stage though, after the first league month of the summer ending you tend to get an idea of how play styles and teams have evolved or devolved. And then around Jan is when it goes back to being the usual 2 hours race that the Pl nearly always is but everyone seems to insist on convincing themselves otherwise for the better part of 6 months. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
On May 14 2019 00:59 Jockmcplop wrote: What stakes? I would bet that City get >95 points and Liverpool get <95 signature bet? | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9707 Posts
Yes you're on! Just name the sig  On May 14 2019 11:07 Rebs wrote: i think he wouldve just taken you on title bets. Getting 95+ points season in season out isnt normal. Both teams will regress a bit. I reckon low 90s for City at nest and mid to high 80 for Liverpool would be a more realistic estimate. Thats a bit on the conservative side but I think thats fairer. I'm not trying to bet that City will win the league again though, I'm betting that they maintain the same level and Liverpool's level drops. 95+ points is abnormal, but City have done it 2 years in a row and although some players in their squad are aging a bit and need to be phased out, they are so strong in depth that I honestly don't think they'll lose more games next year. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
:D For a year? | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9707 Posts
On May 14 2019 17:27 sharkie wrote: "It's official - [winner] knows definitely more about football than [loser]. Go Guardiola/Klopp!" :D For a year? You're on, sharkie! | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
The three relegated teams (Fulham, Huddersfield, Cardiff) had a 0-0-34 record against the top6 teams. Then Manchester United came and the record changed to 1-1-34. This is such a damning stat. ManUtd should be ashamed of themselves | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8715 Posts
On May 14 2019 17:41 sharkie wrote: I just saw a stat of the Premier League: The three relegated teams (Fulham, Huddersfield, Cardiff) had a 0-0-34 record against the top6 teams. Then Manchester United came and the record changed to 1-1-34. This is such a damning stat. ManUtd should be ashamed of themselves even if the 0-0-34 record was preserved man utd should still be ashamed of themselves. i shit you not i could sub in as one of the 11 and the team would not have been much worse. | ||
| ||
