EPTSpurs 13 shots 4 on target
Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target
Clinical Spurs won
2017 - 2018 Football Thread - Page 63
| Forum Index > Sports |
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Spurs 13 shots 4 on target Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target Clinical Spurs won | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On September 13 2017 07:00 nayumi wrote: I don't think United or Real doing well commercially is due to their logos being better than other clubs mate ... So? Not quite sure what you are on about. Juventus are doing something distinctly different from every other club, how is there not a commercial opportunity here for them? Here an article about it: http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_and_identity_for_juventus_by_interbrand.php | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18572 Posts
On September 14 2017 18:31 Pandemona wrote: Because at best it becomes 2-2 for Dortmund, they still would have lost at the chances taken by Spurs! Taking chances > missing. Spurs 13 shots 4 on target Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target Clinical Spurs won Its easy to dominate a game when you are ahead 3-1... Spurs only played good the last 30min... You should watch games instead of using stats blindly | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Dortmund were good first half, still were behind though? Second half were still in control of the ball but without hurting Lloris. Spurs were the opposite, exploiting the defense and poor keeping. This is how it works at the elite level, you can have the ball, but if you do nothing with it you are going to have a bad time! Yes 1 goal wrongly ruled out and should been 2-2 at the break, but the other was a correct decision. This is the champions league, if you can't take your chances or make your 60%(!) possession count you are going to have a bad time. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18572 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18572 Posts
Please don't discuss a game you didn't watch at all... Highlights on sky sports != full game | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28736 Posts
| ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
On September 14 2017 18:00 sharkie wrote: Dortmund took their chances and scored goals. The ref just decided not to allow them. How does that make Spurs deserve their victory? What do you mean by "them?" There was one wrongly disallowed goal. The first one was the correct decision as Aubameyang tried to play the ball and he was well offside. Obviously the second should have counted, but how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? Aside from the goal and the wrongly disallowed goal, they had one other shot on target in 90 minutes. You're making it sound like Barca vs. Chelsea 2012, when in reality it was a pretty even match. | ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
| ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
On September 14 2017 22:53 Dingodile wrote: Tottenham's 3rd goal happened immediately after the wrongfully disallowed goal. Again, how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? From this thread you'd think 4-1 Dortmund would have been a fair scoreline. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18572 Posts
On September 14 2017 22:49 Liquid`Drone wrote: Meh, if you lose 1-3 and one goal was wrongly disallowed then it's kinda meaningless to whine about referee, imo. Of course the game could have ended up playing out differently, but it's not a robbery by the ref or whatever. I honestly got the impression, from a couple posts on the previous page, that the referee got like 3 clinical situations wrong, because that's what in my mind would've justified the complains. Why should it be meaningless? Are you saying that teams play the same way when the scoreline is 2-2 or 2-1? I hardly doubt you want to say that. On September 14 2017 22:59 city42 wrote: Again, how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? From this thread you'd think 4-1 Dortmund would have been a fair scoreline. Dortmund play differently when the scoreline would be 2-2. After a 3-1 in group stage all you do is to stop conceding more goals. Is this your first football season? | ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4139 Posts
| ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
Also, the disallowed goal was in the 56th minute and Kane scored in the 60th minute. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18572 Posts
| ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28736 Posts
On September 14 2017 23:00 sharkie wrote: Why should it be meaningless? Are you saying that teams play the same way when the scoreline is 2-2 or 2-1? I hardly doubt you want to say that. I said 'of course the game could have ended up playing out differently'. But you don't know that. I think it's just as likely that Spurs would have scored a 3-2 goal after Dortmund scored a 2-2 goal as that they would not have scored a 3-2 goal. Maybe if Spurs was only up by 1 goal after the 3-2, they'd keep pushing for more goals to secure the win and they'd win 4-2 instead. When people whine the way you have been about the referee, I expect it to have been a) really abysmal refereeing and/or b) directly changing the result. From what I'm reading, this was one mistake (granted, a significant one) and only indirectly changing the result. If the 2-2 goal was disallowed in the 88th minute, fair enough. But here, Dortmund still had 35 minutes left to play. They weren't desperate to go totally gung ho. Third Tottenham goal might very well have happened even if it was 2-2 instead of 2-1. And if Spurs was so bad, surely Dortmund should have created far more dangerous chances. | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8794 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28736 Posts
| ||
| ||
