Good god did 44 misplay that one. If someone goes 1 vs 2, that weak side D should come over and take his head off, leaving the strong side D with cleanup duty. Instead he meekly poked at the puck and got walked while his partner expected help on the body, not the puck.

Sure, it was a great play by McDavid, but a clear botch by the defense.

QuanticHawk

United States32066 Posts

February 03 2016 12:50 GMT

#365

yeah but 44 also got baited into doing what he did bc mcdavid let it the puck stretch so far and did that crazy ass drag to pull it back. the damn thought he was losing the puck and going to clean up vs going for the hit and leaving it open. goddamn.

Orcasgt24

Canada3238 Posts

February 03 2016 14:13 GMT

#366

On February 03 2016 15:00 RenSC2 wrote:

Show nested quote +

99% of high sex appeal goals are because defense fucked up in someway.

Thats was so beautiful though. I think its absolutely hilarious people are talking Calder. He missed too much time and there is no reason to think Panarin, Larkin or Eichel will slow down.

Jer99

Canada8157 Posts

February 03 2016 14:53 GMT

#367

The 1% is that ovi goal where he's lying back on the ice looking like he's a mobius strip and somehow dragfucks the puck into the net

sharkeyanti

United States1273 Posts

February 03 2016 15:35 GMT

#368

NHL.tv and the new site are pretty terrible atm. I get that they optimize for mobile phones, but come on man make some sort of an effort.

Flaccid

8837 Posts

February 03 2016 15:59 GMT

#369

Finally got to watch the game this morning on shitty, broken gamecenter. And once more:

QuanticHawk

United States32066 Posts

February 03 2016 16:20 GMT

#370

On February 03 2016 23:53 Jer99 wrote:
The 1% is that ovi goal where he's lying back on the ice looking like he's a mobius strip and somehow dragfucks the puck into the net

yup and dragfuck is a fantastic term, thank you for introducing it to me.

even with the fuck up goddamn those handsssssss

i wish there was a livefeed of flaccid watching that

Flaccid

8837 Posts

February 03 2016 16:38 GMT

#371

Dude, I still have such a raging erection this morning that I can't even drive to work.

QuanticHawk

United States32066 Posts

February 03 2016 17:19 GMT

#372

let's pour one out for mike comrie, the fat faced lazy hockey player who was married to hillary duff until today (when's the last time anyone mentioned either of those names??)

remember the better times mike you still got this under your belt

[image loading]

Flaccid

8837 Posts

February 03 2016 20:08 GMT

#373

The doctor told me to lose some weight. So I ate him.

[image loading]

zev318

Canada4306 Posts

February 03 2016 20:53 GMT

#374

20 games for wideman

Jinxed

United States6450 Posts

February 03 2016 22:33 GMT

#375

Deserved. Probably will be appealed, but that's just standard procedure. If he had gotten checked for a concussion or anything like that then maybe 10 would have been okay, but because he chose not to then it almost has to be 20.

Orcasgt24

Canada3238 Posts

February 03 2016 23:15 GMT

#376

On February 04 2016 07:33 Jinxed wrote:
Deserved. Probably will be appealed, but that's just standard procedure. If he had gotten checked for a concussion or anything like that then maybe 10 would have been okay, but because he chose not to then it almost has to be 20.

I think 20 is because of how much pressure the ref union put on the NHL.

As the rules are written I think it was a 10 game offence

QuanticHawk

United States32066 Posts

February 04 2016 03:05 GMT

#377

I think it's a minimum of 10 but that's what other people said on the internets

QuanticHawk

United States32066 Posts

February 04 2016 04:30 GMT

#378

Not that it means much since the pa had to but am appeal was filed.

I'd be really surprised if it was rescinded because he lit him up like you would a player in front of then net and the league and arbitrator probably aren't keen on setting thenprecedent that concussion basically means free for all