EPTOff-Topic General Discussion - Page 4993
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
Crusnik
United States5378 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:33 Alaric wrote: You also have a cat. What do you miss at this point? A dog. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:31 Seuss wrote: I have an actual wife. No waifu required. 2d > 3d. fucking normies. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:33 Alaric wrote: You also have a cat. What do you miss at this point? Being able to eat an entire pizza without gaining weight. | ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:14 Gahlo wrote: Hello there, Gambler. I've heard you're having fallacy issues. I get what you're saying, but isn't the chance he opens 91 packs without opening a legendary incredibly small? Someone feel free to statistically enlighten me but that fallacy is more about perception/belief which may be applicable but like I said, the chances he opens 91 packs with no legendary has to be miniscule. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:33 Alaric wrote: You also have a cat. What do you miss at this point? A cat AND a wife. Fuck that guy. | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
| ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
I can eat an entire pizza without gaining weight I think, but that's because these are small pizzas (1/3rd to 1/4th of what a "real" one is).  | ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
I have a cat-dog. It's a dog that acts like a cat most of the time and is cat-sized. Is that better or worse in your mind? I also had 5 pieces of pizza last night and I stopped myself because I wanted the rest for lunch today. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
That guy supposedly says 100 packs = 99.34% to get at least one legendary On May 15 2015 06:41 mordek wrote: I have a cat-dog. It's a dog that acts like a cat most of the time and is cat-sized. Is that better or worse in your mind? I also had 5 pieces of pizza last night and I stopped myself because I wanted the rest for lunch today. Hmm I like medium-big size dogs and cats so idk what a cat-dog would be. I just want someone to snuggle with me  | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:36 Seuss wrote: Being able to eat an entire pizza without gaining weight. I can do that with the less substantial microwave pizzas but only because I have to walk more than 3 miles every day for my job. Interested in learning to nest search? Entry level pay is $1000 a month! + Show Spoiler + before taxes | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
On May 15 2015 07:03 Dandel Ion wrote: ghandhi should be happy about being the 1% Can't say it's the first time. eyyyyyyyy | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
Still holding onto the good feelings of the elementary school play when you got to be "milk", eh? | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On May 15 2015 06:37 mordek wrote: I get what you're saying, but isn't the chance he opens 91 packs without opening a legendary incredibly small? Someone feel free to statistically enlighten me but that fallacy is more about perception/belief which may be applicable but like I said, the chances he opens 91 packs with no legendary has to be miniscule. well, the gambler's fallacy is that you believe that because you've been unlucky so far, you have a higher chance of winning (when the odds don't actually change). Saying you are more likely to roll a 6 because you haven't rolled one in the last 25 throws would be gambler's fallacy. Just pointing out you've been incredibly unlucky isn't a gambler's fallacy though, it's just Gahlo wanted to laugh at Ghandi so he took the liberty of using a certain term incorrectly. That's fine though, laughing at people sometimes requires sacrifices. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On May 15 2015 07:35 Scip wrote: well, the gambler's fallacy is that you believe that because you've been unlucky so far, you have a higher chance of winning (when the odds don't actually change). Saying you are more likely to roll a 6 because you haven't rolled one in the last 25 throws would be gambler's fallacy. Just pointing out you've been incredibly unlucky isn't a gambler's fallacy though, it's just Gahlo wanted to laugh at Ghandi so he took the liberty of using a certain term incorrectly. That's fine though, laughing at people sometimes requires sacrifices. The point I was making was that how many packs he opened doesn't matter. That and making it a dick pun. Good job assuming you knew what I was thinking though. | ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On May 15 2015 08:08 Gahlo wrote: The point I was making was that how many packs he opened doesn't matter. That and making it a dick pun. Good job assuming you knew what I was thinking though. What do you mean it doesn't matter. In what way doesn't it matter? | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On May 15 2015 08:23 Scip wrote: What do you mean it doesn't matter. In what way doesn't it matter? How many packs it is doesn't matter because he's probably rolling in dust and has saved enough to craft at least 1 legendary by now. In addition, given the slow rate of pack opening, it's fairly safe to say he isn't spending money on them which removes the "fast but costs money" angst. | ||
| ||
