|
monkies is a better word though
On January 09 2015 03:47 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies I for one will continue to strive to be better than highly evolved monkeys. I cant remember the details but maxim did a study thing where if they had a dude on the front they would sell less copies than if they had a sexualized chick on the front even if the reader base was way more interested in stories about the dude than the chick. Spending money on stuff you dont need cause it has a sexy chick on the front is pretty lame.
so what? its not objectively bad to buy something. Almost everything you buy is something you don't need ultimately anyway.
everything we do is basically still from ancient monkey programming. Just because sexuality is a bit more basic and common to everyone than a love of video games or mathematics or whatever doesn't mean its a BAD thing.
|
On January 09 2015 03:46 Fildun wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:45 Rockafellalp wrote:On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies But but! Why are there still monkey's then! Fucking checkmate. Rekt I don't know, ask your mom.
Hey man... My mom is nice and stuff
|
On January 09 2015 03:47 Rockafellalp wrote:
I'm not religious by any means I have a serious hard on for shows and stories that are about heaven vs hell, angels and Demons etc... I find that shit to be excellent for games/shows/movies
you just like the ancient blood feud thing don't you? it helps there is often magic and stuff involved too though.
|
On January 09 2015 03:48 Rockafellalp wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:46 Fildun wrote:On January 09 2015 03:45 Rockafellalp wrote:On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies But but! Why are there still monkey's then! Fucking checkmate. Rekt I don't know, ask your mom. Hey man... My mom is nice and stuff
So are monkies. Checkmate.
|
On January 09 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:40 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? Technically yes. You can only go up or down, you can't do both. Really, you just gotta decide what you're trying to unlock.
Whoa whoa whoa, hang on old timer.
Worshipping Satan and the Saviour is not a logical contradiction. Therefore, it is possible to do both. That is fine.
But going up and down? This is a logical contradiction, as going up implies that you are not going down. It is physically impossible to do both.
I can worship both Satan and the Saviour under the belief that anything of religious significance should be worshipped, as religion is something of worship.* There is no contradiction in worshipping both, however there is a contradiction in going both up and down.
*Not my actual belief.
|
On January 09 2015 03:47 Rockafellalp wrote:
I'm not religious by any means I have a serious hard on for shows and stories that are about heaven vs hell, angels and Demons etc... I find that shit to be excellent for games/shows/movies
it makes for good fantasy genre, and already has a pretty elaborate developed lore.
|
On January 09 2015 03:45 Requizen wrote:
@swimming:
I haven't had any structure. I usually average a 40-45s 50s but I only do 2-4x100 on top of the leg and twist drills and I'm rekt by the end. I do feel better about the legs not being the propulsion, I was confused why it felt they were helping so little. My focus was all wrong. Need to watch videos or something.
|
On January 09 2015 03:49 Frudgey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 09 2015 03:40 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? Technically yes. You can only go up or down, you can't do both. Really, you just gotta decide what you're trying to unlock. Whoa whoa whoa, hang on old timer. Worshipping Satan and the Saviour is not a logical contradiction. Therefore, it is possible to do both. That is fine. But going up and down? This is a logical contradiction, as going up implies that you are not going down. It is physically impossible to do both. I can worship both Satan and the Saviour under the belief that anything of religious significance should be worshipped, as religion is something of worship.* There is no contradiction in worshipping both, however there is a contradiction in going both up and down. *Not my actual belief.
Can't tell if whoosh or not.
|
On January 09 2015 03:45 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? If you believe in one, you have to believe in the other.
Well, the question was one of loyalty, not of belief.
It was also incredibly tongue in cheek
|
On January 09 2015 03:55 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:49 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 09 2015 03:40 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? Technically yes. You can only go up or down, you can't do both. Really, you just gotta decide what you're trying to unlock. Whoa whoa whoa, hang on old timer. Worshipping Satan and the Saviour is not a logical contradiction. Therefore, it is possible to do both. That is fine. But going up and down? This is a logical contradiction, as going up implies that you are not going down. It is physically impossible to do both. I can worship both Satan and the Saviour under the belief that anything of religious significance should be worshipped, as religion is something of worship.* There is no contradiction in worshipping both, however there is a contradiction in going both up and down. *Not my actual belief. Can't tell if whoosh or not.
If you mean "whoosh" as in what you said went over my head, then I think you'd be correct in that assumption.
|
Scip linking Voltaire. Colour me surprised, but not displeased.
A lot of the demons and angels stories are lame as hell now just because they've gotten even more popular into culture/entertainment/I can't remember which word to use, so you've got a lot of stuff where "demons" and such is just slapped on top of it to make it look "cool", kinda how elves and vampires (and more recently werewolves) and shit works.
So most of it is bland because it's bland shit using that to try and look cool.
On January 09 2015 03:35 jcarlsoniv wrote:
but then I'd get less interaction with the nice lady at the kitchen who gives me free stuff all the time!
Then when do you repay her by treating her to a drink?
|
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 09 2015 03:47 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies I for one will continue to strive to be better than highly evolved monkeys. I cant remember the details but maxim did a study thing where if they had a dude on the front they would sell less copies than if they had a sexualized chick on the front even if the reader base was way more interested in stories about the dude than the chick. Spending money on stuff you dont need cause it has a sexy chick on the front is pretty lame.
and what a wonderful job you are doing :3
@Alaric I encountered Voltaire when listening to random nightcored songs. OpieOP
|
On January 09 2015 03:47 Slayer91 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:47 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies I for one will continue to strive to be better than highly evolved monkeys. I cant remember the details but maxim did a study thing where if they had a dude on the front they would sell less copies than if they had a sexualized chick on the front even if the reader base was way more interested in stories about the dude than the chick. Spending money on stuff you dont need cause it has a sexy chick on the front is pretty lame. so what? its not objectively bad to buy something. Almost everything you buy is something you don't need ultimately anyway. everything we do is basically still from ancient monkey programming. Just because sexuality is a bit more basic and common to everyone than a love of video games or mathematics or whatever doesn't mean its a BAD thing.
no but if you are going to pay for sexy might as well buy porn! im not against buying sex or w.e. to exaggerate i'm just saying if you were buying like a graphics card picking the one with the sexy chick on the front would be a lame reason kinda thing. I'm saying its lame how well putting a sexy picture on something makes us want it more. almost nothing I do daily is still from ancient monkey programming tho. just fucking sleeping eating and scratching my balls. alright on a good day i do that a lot you have a point.
|
On January 09 2015 03:55 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:49 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 09 2015 03:40 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? Technically yes. You can only go up or down, you can't do both. Really, you just gotta decide what you're trying to unlock. Whoa whoa whoa, hang on old timer. Worshipping Satan and the Saviour is not a logical contradiction. Therefore, it is possible to do both. That is fine. But going up and down? This is a logical contradiction, as going up implies that you are not going down. It is physically impossible to do both. I can worship both Satan and the Saviour under the belief that anything of religious significance should be worshipped, as religion is something of worship.* There is no contradiction in worshipping both, however there is a contradiction in going both up and down. *Not my actual belief. Can't tell if whoosh or not.
Don't worry Wave, I got the obvious Isaac joke.
|
On January 09 2015 04:01 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:47 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:47 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:42 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:41 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:36 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:35 ComaDose wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Slayer91 wrote:On January 09 2015 03:15 ComaDose wrote:
My understanding is that previously hips and boobs ment good for bearing children i.e. venus figurines in paleolithic times. now its probably just cause the media told us its sexy. I don't buy this bullshit that people spread around that blames the media on EVERYTHING men have liked boobs for fucking millenia and TV has been around for a century boobs get a better rep in the press because you can't really show models from the rear view for example so in most movies and pictures and stuff you see the boobs more than anything because they are closer to the face which is good for the screen i mean we know we have ass-men too (cosmo kramer proctology) it could be high estrogen gives people wider hips, fatter asses as well as bigger boobs and high estrogen is indicative of high fertility i believe well yeah i was mostly joking. its probably just genetic inertia or w.e. but the media does sensationalize em a lot like you said. thats because people buy things with boobs in them i wonder why sex sells is so true and kinda embarrassing for us On January 09 2015 03:38 Scip wrote:
it's because life is so much fun when you're horny
especially if you need a rudder while swimming its not really embarassing if you stop pretending we aren't just highly evolved monkies I for one will continue to strive to be better than highly evolved monkeys. I cant remember the details but maxim did a study thing where if they had a dude on the front they would sell less copies than if they had a sexualized chick on the front even if the reader base was way more interested in stories about the dude than the chick. Spending money on stuff you dont need cause it has a sexy chick on the front is pretty lame. so what? its not objectively bad to buy something. Almost everything you buy is something you don't need ultimately anyway. everything we do is basically still from ancient monkey programming. Just because sexuality is a bit more basic and common to everyone than a love of video games or mathematics or whatever doesn't mean its a BAD thing. no but if you are going to pay for sexy might as well buy porn! im not against buying sex or w.e. to exaggerate i'm just saying if you were buying like a graphics card picking the one with the sexy chick on the front would be a lame reason kinda thing. I'm saying its lame how well putting a sexy picture on something makes us want it more. almost nothing I do daily is still from ancient monkey programming tho. just fucking sleeping eating and scratching my balls. alright on a good day i do that a lot you have a point.
you're not really against it you just don't like being manipulated which is fair.
a lot of the reason we might buy something over another thing is aesthetic and thats what all this marketing and sexual stuff is all about. If you feel like the thing you got was cooler even if its 0.1% worse well it's not that bad of a thing.
also playing video games is ancient monkey programming because its competing and activating all sorts of reward centres that come from understanding the environment and learning skills and succeeding in competition which are all naturally selected traits.
so sure the pure intellectual stuff is sort of unique to us but the motivation is what drives everything.
|
Also Scip with the Eve icon feels right, IMO.
|
On January 09 2015 04:04 Ketara wrote:
Don't worry Wave, I got the obvious Isaac joke.
I mean its not like the joke matters. they are both the same place. you end up inside the chest in isaacs rooom either way, and mega satan is always there so what does it matter.
|
On January 09 2015 04:04 Ketara wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2015 03:55 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 09 2015 03:49 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 09 2015 03:40 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 09 2015 03:31 Frudgey wrote:On January 09 2015 03:30 Lord Tolkien wrote:On January 09 2015 03:20 PrinceXizor wrote:
soniv, do you have a sams club membership? heathen! heretic to the true faith of costco! Couldn't he be loyal to both? Or is that just simply asking for too much? can one be loyaly to both Satan and the savior? Technically yes. You can only go up or down, you can't do both. Really, you just gotta decide what you're trying to unlock. Whoa whoa whoa, hang on old timer. Worshipping Satan and the Saviour is not a logical contradiction. Therefore, it is possible to do both. That is fine. But going up and down? This is a logical contradiction, as going up implies that you are not going down. It is physically impossible to do both. I can worship both Satan and the Saviour under the belief that anything of religious significance should be worshipped, as religion is something of worship.* There is no contradiction in worshipping both, however there is a contradiction in going both up and down. *Not my actual belief. Can't tell if whoosh or not. Don't worry Wave, I got the obvious Isaac joke.
Man I feel like such an idiot now.
Leave it to Off-Topic to humble me. Again.
|
By the way, now that the site has changed, is there a reason to look at threads other than this one yet?
Because I'm scared if I read GD I'll get cancer.
|
On January 09 2015 04:09 Ketara wrote:
By the way, now that the site has changed, is there a reason to look at threads other than this one yet?
Because I'm scared if I read GD I'll get cancer.
acting as if you were never a contributor to GD cancer
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
