EPTOn February 07 2018 13:56 nick00bot wrote:
The way he is playing tanks is just so easy to see and counter for the protoss, he's playing like it's TvZ where midgame armies cannot ever be perfectly crafted to deal with tanks.
I think the biggest thing that was missing unit wise from special was liberators, and the lack of multiprong was really uncharacteristic.
The style he went for is much better suited for the current mass gateway meta, since I do think that terran can afford to sit back and build good splash there, but he saw that SoS was going for a heavy robo deathballish army every game, and played a passive style instead of abusing SoS' immobility
The way he is playing tanks is just so easy to see and counter for the protoss, he's playing like it's TvZ where midgame armies cannot ever be perfectly crafted to deal with tanks.
I think the biggest thing that was missing unit wise from special was liberators, and the lack of multiprong was really uncharacteristic.
The style he went for is much better suited for the current mass gateway meta, since I do think that terran can afford to sit back and build good splash there, but he saw that SoS was going for a heavy robo deathballish army every game, and played a passive style instead of abusing SoS' immobility
Harass was pretty good though.
However i do agree that just leaving the tanks at home and loading his entire bio force into medivacs and get them across the map while teching to ranged liberators would have made much more sense.
The fact that at some point SoS sent all his zealots to runby, and that major left all his tanks sieged in the middle of the map seems to me like he simply just fucked up. I mean if SoS just had warped 10 zealots and charged into the tanks it was gg.
