|
United States97274 Posts
On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play
|
On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play
It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be.
|
|
Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced.
|
United States97274 Posts
On December 26 2017 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be. they forfeited the guy in the loser bracket too. his Korean name in the bracket matches http://aligulac.com/players/6991-olvy/ who has played in GSL qualifiers before. prob just no showed
On December 26 2017 11:47 Soke wrote: Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced. the 2 innos are capitalized differently and have different names next to them. I think it was just a repeat ID
|
Australia18228 Posts
Not walling off vs NoRegreT lmao
|
Does Trap know who NoRegreT is? Because I'm not sure what that was.
|
On December 26 2017 11:53 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be. Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:47 Soke wrote: Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced. the 2 innos are capitalized differently and have different names next to them. I think it was just a repeat ID
Ah, maybe. Makes sense
|
NoRegret going hatch first, breaking new ground
|
On December 26 2017 11:53 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be. they forfeited the guy in the loser bracket too. his Korean name in the bracket matches http://aligulac.com/players/6991-olvy/ who has played in GSL qualifiers before. prob just no showed Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:47 Soke wrote: Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced. the 2 innos are capitalized differently and have different names next to them. I think it was just a repeat ID
Yeah. You're right. Of course they also spelled NoRegreT's name wrong.
|
Over the shoulder quite cast is still 1000x better than trying to watch GSL in 2010 was
|
On December 26 2017 11:59 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:53 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be. they forfeited the guy in the loser bracket too. his Korean name in the bracket matches http://aligulac.com/players/6991-olvy/ who has played in GSL qualifiers before. prob just no showed On December 26 2017 11:47 Soke wrote: Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced. the 2 innos are capitalized differently and have different names next to them. I think it was just a repeat ID Yeah. You're right. Of course they also spelled NoRegreT's name wrong.
Jake actually did that himself. He wanted it to be NoRugrats, but apparently someone added an "e" (at least that's what he said )
|
United States97274 Posts
On December 26 2017 11:59 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:53 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On December 26 2017 11:43 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:42 Solar424 wrote:On December 26 2017 11:39 Shellshock wrote:On December 26 2017 11:36 ZigguratOfUr wrote: sOs vs INno in round 2 is interesting. At least we have a loser's bracket. Inno in group A is a fraud. Real Inno is in group D Group D Inno = T-800, Group A Inno = T-1000, new and improved. Won’t choke at Blizzcon and when up 3-0. yeah Group A Inno already forfeited so he doesnt ever have to go to Blizzcon. cant choke if you don't play It's probably a mistake. You know how unreliable these brackets can be. they forfeited the guy in the loser bracket too. his Korean name in the bracket matches http://aligulac.com/players/6991-olvy/ who has played in GSL qualifiers before. prob just no showed On December 26 2017 11:47 Soke wrote: Inno is actually in group D. I think he was just misplaced. the 2 innos are capitalized differently and have different names next to them. I think it was just a repeat ID Yeah. You're right. Of course they also spelled NoRegreT's name wrong. Korea is in on memes. need to go warn them
|
NoRegret macroing in game 2. Super surprising.
|
On December 26 2017 11:59 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: NoRegret going hatch first, breaking new ground Was it in his side of the map or Trap’s, because it’s only progress if it’s on his side.
|
On December 26 2017 12:06 Solar424 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 11:59 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: NoRegret going hatch first, breaking new ground Was it in his side of the map or Trap’s, because it’s only progress if it’s on his side. It was on his side. He almost won but then forgot the Hydra upgrade and lost
|
It's admirable that NoRegreT goes for a fourth and fifth base. He doesn't send workers to mine from them though, so it's basically a ling-bane-hydra all-in off five hatches, but it's the thought that counts.
|
Rapid noting that while NoRegret didn't get the win in game 2, at least he got some Warchest EXP.
|
Australia18228 Posts
On December 26 2017 12:08 ZigguratOfUr wrote: It's admirable that NoRegreT goes for a fourth and fifth base. He doesn't send workers to mine from them though, so it's basically an all-in off five hatches, but it's the thought that counts.
They're macro hatches for more lings
|
On December 26 2017 12:09 Inflicted wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2017 12:08 ZigguratOfUr wrote: It's admirable that NoRegreT goes for a fourth and fifth base. He doesn't send workers to mine from them though, so it's basically an all-in off five hatches, but it's the thought that counts. They're macro hatches for more lings
Absolutely. That's what's annoying about zerg. They can go for all-ins and half the viewers think it's macro due to all the extra hatches.
|
|
|
|