EPT
[WCS] Copa Intercontinental - Page 84
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28463 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:22 BluemoonSC wrote: if you're going to play semantics, a semi-finalist is someone that makes it to the semi-finals of a tournament. in a single elimination, that makes the 3rd and 4th place finishers semi-finalists. im not sure what your point is, but you're not making your case for not having a 3rd place match in a single-elimination tournament. what about 5th 6th 7th etc? | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:22 BluemoonSC wrote: if you're going to play semantics, a semi-finalist is someone that makes it to the semi-finals of a tournament. in a single elimination, that makes the 3rd and 4th place finishers semi-finalists. im not sure what your point is, but you're not making your case for not having a 3rd place match in a single-elimination tournament. there's no 3rd place if you don't play a 3rd place match. that person is a semi-finalist. | ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:20 Ej_ wrote: 3rd place matches are boring because nobody cares about them, players includd Or just the other one does. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
need quadraple elimination bracket | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9362 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:21 VHbb wrote: It's always nice to see a pro post in one of these threads, and the TL community trying to coach him (or just criticizing him, since that's what is *cool*) So when a pro who is bad in a matchup plays a style that no other better pro's use and fails at it, do you think that's optimal? Do you think other pro's would tell uthermal do continue sieging liberators poorly while not building medivacs? | ||
|
ArtyK
France3143 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:22 uThermal wrote: I'm not used to playing with liberators but I thought they were my only option, bio doesnt seem to trade well enough against adepts, think I played pretty well against Neeb, definitely played bad against showtime though It's ok, you're still top 3 terran control EU | ||
|
Elentos
55468 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:22 uThermal wrote: I'm not used to playing with liberators but I thought they were my only option, bio doesnt seem to trade well enough against adepts, think I played pretty well against Neeb, definitely played bad against showtime though I think remaking medivacs could have saved you two out of those 3 games. And I think the only way you beat what Neeb did on Dasan is vetoing the map. | ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:22 ArtyK wrote: it has nothing to do with single elimination, do you want a 5th place match too? isn't that logical to have a third place match in single elim bracket with cash/pts difference? only 3rd cause gold, silver and bronze aspect like olympic games for example | ||
|
Penev
28463 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:25 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: isn't that logical to have a third place match in single elim bracket with cash/pts difference? only 3rd cause gold, silver and bronze aspect like olympic games for example it's not logic it's preference, I prefer no 3rd place match | ||
|
VHbb
689 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:23 Hider wrote: So when a pro who is bad in a matchup plays a style that no other better pro's use and fails at it, do you think that's optimal? Do you think other pro's would tell uthermal do continue sieging liberators poorly while not building medivacs? I think uThermal is a better judge than you or most of non-pros when it comes to how he played (I also didn't write "optimal" anywhere in my post..) But don't bother answering, these threads are big list of snarky comments and the same users (you could cite them one by one) posting over and over trying to feel the *coolest* among them (generally by complaining about: balance, level of the games, wcs system, casters, anything really) so I'm in the wrong for expecting something better  | ||
|
ArtyK
France3143 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:25 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: isn't that logical to have a third place match in single elim bracket with cash/pts difference? only 3rd cause gold, silver and bronze aspect like olympic games for example Olympic games is just tradition, doesn't make it good | ||
|
Elentos
55468 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15883 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:25 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: isn't that logical to have a third place match in single elim bracket with cash/pts difference? only 3rd cause gold, silver and bronze aspect like olympic games for example no it's not logical just because it's done at the olympics. | ||
|
Biscuittzz
155 Posts
The teams look like they don't want to be there. As the saying goes, if you're not first you're last. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:26 VHbb wrote: I think uThermal is a better judge than you or most of non-pros when it comes to how he played (I also didn't write "optimal" anywhere in my post..) But don't bother answering, these threads are big list of snarky comments and the same users (you could cite them one by one) posting over and over trying to feel the *coolest* among them (generally by complaining about: balance, level of the games, wcs system, casters, anything really) so I'm in the wrong for expecting something better Where do i stand on that list of coolest complainers? I feel pretty cool tbh | ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:25 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: isn't that logical to have a third place match in single elim bracket with cash/pts difference? only 3rd cause gold, silver and bronze aspect like olympic games for example There is only points/cash difference, because someone thinks its a good Idea. The next guy thinks 5th place should be a thing and we see small semis and even smaller final for 5th place which got a point/cash difference. Alot of sports dont use this, pretty much every single eliminiation bracket in football outside of the world and continental cups for example dont care about it. I dont know a Starcraft player who would rather split the extra money of the 3rd place for both semi final exiters instead of playing another meaningles game for it. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:27 Elentos wrote: Yeah you can totally kill the Ursadon for the achievement in a custom game. I can't believe you actually checked that. | ||
Poopi
France12762 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:24 ArtyK wrote: It's ok, you're still top 3 terran control EU Imo, it's hard to look good with liberators, like it's very hard to even look "decent" with them even when you are controlling them well. Easier to look good with bio control without it being necessarily harder to perform. | ||
|
ArtyK
France3143 Posts
On September 12 2016 07:26 VHbb wrote: I think uThermal is a better judge than you or most of non-pros when it comes to how he played (I also didn't write "optimal" anywhere in my post..) But don't bother answering, these threads are big list of snarky comments and the same users (you could cite them one by one) posting over and over trying to feel the *coolest* among them (generally by complaining about: balance, level of the games, wcs system, casters, anything really) so I'm in the wrong for expecting something better But that's what those threads are for! Ask Nerchio | ||
| ||
