EPTOn May 15 2016 06:27 Alchemik wrote:
genuinely the first time I heard the name "Lowely"
genuinely the first time I heard the name "Lowely"
Well now we know you didnt watch sc2 in 2012
[WCS] Spring Championships 2016 - Page 101
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
Well now we know you didnt watch sc2 in 2012 | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
thanks tasteless and artosis for the games | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:29 Shellshock wrote: Too 4 wcs eu 2012. No premier league invite. What a joke Blizzard deciseon making. First lowely now clem. | ||
|
ArtyK
France3143 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
Overall pretty fantastic day of starcraft. | ||
|
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:30 Cricketer12 wrote: Well now we know you didnt watch sc2 in 2012 first tournament I watched was the Nation Wars with Day9 and TB ah what a good tournament it was | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:27 Alchemik wrote: genuinely the first time I heard the name "Lowely" That was the most blatant disregard of their own seeding rules | ||
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:29 Shellshock wrote: Too 4 wcs eu 2012. No premier league invite. What a joke Read the thread See that Lowely got top 4 wcs Go on google to check who he is Check the race Go back in the thread see 2012 Make sense | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
also hopefully my internet doesn't blow again | ||
|
Poopi
France12886 Posts
 | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
OK, I have it ... just needed to wait a while | ||
|
PharaphobiaSC
Czech Republic457 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:27 Incognoto wrote: how many viewers did we get today Overall starcraft had 35k+ viewers @-1100 watching MaximusIrelevant so pretty good i guess. Alot of local language streams as well. But main stream had around 20k all the time. | ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
| ||
CynicalDeath
Italy3413 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:49 radiaL wrote: When will vods be up? ..a half of them are already up on the dreamhack yt page, the rest you can watch twitch vods of the 2 channels.. | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
In an offline tournament you have refferes/admins who can rule on a given situation. Using auto draw mechanics is stupid. In this case extremely unfair. Strange was robbed of his victory and all viewers saw it. Organizers took a very bad decision to respect the auto draw. I understand it was a hard decision to take but this mechanic is for mass games not for pro players. | ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:51 CynicalDeath wrote: ..a half of them are already up on the dreamhack yt page, the rest you can watch twitch vods of the 2 channels.. Thank you! | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:52 Kafka777 wrote: I'll add my two cents to the Polt-Strange game. In an offline tournament you have refferes/admins who can rule on a given situation. Using auto draw mechanics is stupid. In this case extremely unfair. Strange was robbed of his victory and all viewers saw it. Organizers took a very bad decision to respect the auto draw. I understand it was a hard decision to take but this mechanic is for mass games not for pro players. Conversely the game mechanics have been pre-determined for years and the fact that Strange did not prevent the tie from happening is just as much as Polt trying to get the tie. If Strange doesn't decide to win the game in the time that game mechanics alott, then why should he be given a victory? | ||
|
InvictusRage
United States230 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:52 Kafka777 wrote: I'll add my two cents to the Polt-Strange game. In an offline tournament you have refferes/admins who can rule on a given situation. Using auto draw mechanics is stupid. In this case extremely unfair. Strange was robbed of his victory and all viewers saw it. Organizers took a very bad decision to respect the auto draw. I understand it was a hard decision to take but this mechanic is for mass games not for pro players. It was said on PtitDrogo's twitter that both players saw the countdown on their screens. They both played the way they played because of the timer. Changing the rules after the fact when the players were depending on those rules when they were playing is not cool. | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On May 15 2016 06:52 Kafka777 wrote: I'll add my two cents to the Polt-Strange game. In an offline tournament you have refferes/admins who can rule on a given situation. Using auto draw mechanics is stupid. In this case extremely unfair. Strange was robbed of his victory and all viewers saw it. Organizers took a very bad decision to respect the auto draw. I understand it was a hard decision to take but this mechanic is for mass games not for pro players. Using this mechanic was wrong, maybe even a mistake, but there was no other decision, the organizers could make. So they decided correctly, the only way, how they could decide. | ||
| ||
