EPT[GSL] Code A Season 1 2016 - Day 3 - Page 35
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
p68
100 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37095 Posts
On January 16 2016 01:14 Shellshock wrote: well this wasn't good for my lb WTF HOW DID STATS AND BOMBER LOSE?! | ||
|
Elentos
55581 Posts
DeParture is really good, and PvZ isn't figured out yet to the point where it's really a surprise for Stats to lose tbh. Also lol it's Bomber. | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
Seed took the main engagement at 1700 minerals. This is why Bomber could hold, and seed was able to win anyway (he had done a lot of SCV damage earlier, and the trade was still okay for him. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On January 16 2016 01:14 Shellshock wrote: well this wasn't good for my lb 3/3 baby come at me | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
I should have trusted in the departure daily cup results more | ||
|
Elentos
55581 Posts
On January 16 2016 03:05 Shellshock wrote: I should have trusted in the departure daily cup results more DeParture: 1 offline tournament win in 2015 Stats: 0 offline tournament wins You should have known all along! | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55581 Posts
On January 16 2016 03:17 Inflicted wrote: ZvP is DeParture's only good matchup, why would you doubt him He's reached >50% all-time in all matchups now :3 You know a 20-year old has talent when he's never made Code S before but Rain is one of his top 5 victims. | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On January 16 2016 00:57 Elentos wrote: The bets could be on the map DRGLing won. It also doesn't have to mean anything, the betting lines could have been purposefully skewed. Your third option would suprisingly go against the "the favored player never fixes" paradigm though | ||
|
Elentos
55581 Posts
On January 16 2016 03:33 OtherWorld wrote: Your third option would suprisingly go against the "the favored player never fixes" paradigm though When the betting line thing first started occuring more, one of the games was INnoVation was Super. INno was highly favored to win the series, but for the only map Super won, the betting lines were extremely shifted in favor of Super. So it wouldn't be a completely new occurence. That said, it's still possible there was not actually any matchfixing going on in either of these cases. So meh. | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
2/3 baby best day yet | ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On January 16 2016 03:48 Elentos wrote: When the betting line thing first started occuring more, one of the games was INnoVation was Super. INno was highly favored to win the series, but for the only map Super won, the betting lines were extremely shifted in favor of Super. So it wouldn't be a completely new occurence. That said, it's still possible there was not actually any matchfixing going on in either of these cases. So meh. I know of the INno case, but I was talking about the situations that were proven as matchfixing. | ||
|
ParksonVN
Australia370 Posts
On January 16 2016 01:48 Mozdk wrote: Casters and Seed have no clue what actually went on in the game where Bomber held and still lost. Seed took the main engagement at 1700 minerals. This is why Bomber could hold, and seed was able to win anyway (he had done a lot of SCV damage earlier, and the trade was still okay for him. OK, u know about the game more than Seed does himself or even Korean casters who have most experience. How rediculous  | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On January 16 2016 09:44 ParksonVN wrote: OK, u know about the game more than Seed does himself or even Korean casters who have most experience. How rediculous Didn't he only kill 5 scvs that game with the harass that game? Unless i'm getting the games mixed up. | ||
Poopi
France12935 Posts
He might have held with three or four bunkers. | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States14000 Posts
Question of the Day right there  | ||
| ||
