|
On July 17 2015 00:40 SNSeigifried wrote:
Can't believe we are gonna lose either Bunny/Lilbow makes me kinda sad they both are close to top 16 and any bit of wcs points would of helped fuck man if only arium had like group a/l -_-
i wanted both to go through :/
|
On July 17 2015 00:39 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:38 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:37 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:37 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
White-Ra still in a 90 supply deficit. How is he still even in that game? What a god. Borrex was being a bit dumb as well, if Ra was more careful with his tempests he might've slogged out a win. Nobody expects White-Ra to get more than Ro32 anyway right? But I think that it's nice how he stays with the SC community.
Tbh if he 2-1'd patience that would've been the dream. I think his PvP is definitely his strong MU, lots of room for protoss bullshit and counter-bullshit.
|
On July 17 2015 00:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:37 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:36 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:33 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:31 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:30 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:29 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:28 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:28 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:26 IntoTheheart wrote:
[quote]
Hardly, I'm not seeing Adele roll anywhere. The r/fatpeoplehate archive is still on Slimgur I'll have you know that I'm rather fond of that song. Not one of my favorites. I did like her in Skyfall though. I really liked all of Skyfall. Fantastic 007 film that really brings James Bond into the 21st century. Casino Royale did it nicely as well. Changing the game from baccarat to Texas Hold'em was a very good touch. Yeah, absolutely. I feel like Craig's movies did a much better job modernizing with 007 than the Brosnan movies because Brosnan was all about gadgets, and Craig is all about character. So instead of shoving futuristic gadgets, they just have a contemporary setting where real-world-ish villains exist and try to accomplish real-world-ish things. I mean, real-world-ish essentially means "more grounded than some of the shit Moore's villains wanted to do." Agreed. I like Dalton's for the same reason. They're dark and very realistic.. Living Daylights had a really cool plot and came around the same time as glasnost, and it really highlighted how the US and Soviets put aside their differences to turn on the people who were playing them both for their money. And then Licence to Kill was all about corruption and drugs, and also he set a dude on fire. That was pretty cool. I liked Dalton's films but I felt like maaaaybe they were a bit too violent for Bond. License to Kill would still have been just as good without his brutal murder methods, but maybe that was necessary to explore what happens when Bond gets pushed too far - I won't give away the plot in case someone watches it, but like Sent said, it's very dark. Fair enough. Living Daylights has a very Dark Knight-y feel to it though, especially in the first third of the movie. Just the right amount of violence (and also the right amount of abstaining from violence) to make it work like a charm. Hasn't really aged well because of who helps Bond save the day in the end though lol
Living Daylights needs context to be watchable, sadly. Luckily I was doing cold-war history at the time so things kinda made sense, but I feel like you're gonna have to watch "For Your Eyes Only" just to get a grasp on General Gogol, which explains the rest of the film.
|
On July 17 2015 00:40 SNSeigifried wrote:
Can't believe we are gonna lose either Bunny/Lilbow makes me kinda sad they both are close to top 16 and any bit of wcs points would of helped fuck man if only arium had like group a/l -_-
If Lilbow wins, I'm pretty sure he'll face MlorD in the Ro32. It's always like this.
|
On July 17 2015 00:41 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:40 SNSeigifried wrote:
Can't believe we are gonna lose either Bunny/Lilbow makes me kinda sad they both are close to top 16 and any bit of wcs points would of helped fuck man if only arium had like group a/l -_- If Lilbow wins, I'm pretty sure he'll face MlorD in the Ro32. It's always like this.
Dreamhack literally killing foreigner at Blizzcon Dreams One Step At a Time!!!
|
Lilbow-Bunny has already started on Millenium.
|
On July 17 2015 00:41 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:37 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:36 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:33 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:31 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:30 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:29 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:28 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:28 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
[quote]
The r/fatpeoplehate archive is still on Slimgur I'll have you know that I'm rather fond of that song. Not one of my favorites. I did like her in Skyfall though. I really liked all of Skyfall. Fantastic 007 film that really brings James Bond into the 21st century. Casino Royale did it nicely as well. Changing the game from baccarat to Texas Hold'em was a very good touch. Yeah, absolutely. I feel like Craig's movies did a much better job modernizing with 007 than the Brosnan movies because Brosnan was all about gadgets, and Craig is all about character. So instead of shoving futuristic gadgets, they just have a contemporary setting where real-world-ish villains exist and try to accomplish real-world-ish things. I mean, real-world-ish essentially means "more grounded than some of the shit Moore's villains wanted to do." Agreed. I like Dalton's for the same reason. They're dark and very realistic.. Living Daylights had a really cool plot and came around the same time as glasnost, and it really highlighted how the US and Soviets put aside their differences to turn on the people who were playing them both for their money. And then Licence to Kill was all about corruption and drugs, and also he set a dude on fire. That was pretty cool. I liked Dalton's films but I felt like maaaaybe they were a bit too violent for Bond. License to Kill would still have been just as good without his brutal murder methods, but maybe that was necessary to explore what happens when Bond gets pushed too far - I won't give away the plot in case someone watches it, but like Sent said, it's very dark. Fair enough. Living Daylights has a very Dark Knight-y feel to it though, especially in the first third of the movie. Just the right amount of violence (and also the right amount of abstaining from violence) to make it work like a charm. Hasn't really aged well because of who helps Bond save the day in the end though lol Living Daylights needs context to be watchable, sadly. Luckily I was doing cold-war history at the time so things kinda made sense, but I feel like you're gonna have to watch "For Your Eyes Only" just to get a grasp on General Gogol, which explains the rest of the film.
I don't think I actually finished that one. Something just didn't click for me and I can't quite remember what it was.
It seemed to make sense from a general Cold War perspective.
|
White Ra doing 3 base DT. One pylon spotted, other is safe.
|
|
|
On July 17 2015 00:44 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:41 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:37 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:36 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:33 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:31 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:30 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:29 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:28 IntoTheheart wrote:
[quote]
I'll have you know that I'm rather fond of that song. Not one of my favorites. I did like her in Skyfall though. I really liked all of Skyfall. Fantastic 007 film that really brings James Bond into the 21st century. Casino Royale did it nicely as well. Changing the game from baccarat to Texas Hold'em was a very good touch. Yeah, absolutely. I feel like Craig's movies did a much better job modernizing with 007 than the Brosnan movies because Brosnan was all about gadgets, and Craig is all about character. So instead of shoving futuristic gadgets, they just have a contemporary setting where real-world-ish villains exist and try to accomplish real-world-ish things. I mean, real-world-ish essentially means "more grounded than some of the shit Moore's villains wanted to do." Agreed. I like Dalton's for the same reason. They're dark and very realistic.. Living Daylights had a really cool plot and came around the same time as glasnost, and it really highlighted how the US and Soviets put aside their differences to turn on the people who were playing them both for their money. And then Licence to Kill was all about corruption and drugs, and also he set a dude on fire. That was pretty cool. I liked Dalton's films but I felt like maaaaybe they were a bit too violent for Bond. License to Kill would still have been just as good without his brutal murder methods, but maybe that was necessary to explore what happens when Bond gets pushed too far - I won't give away the plot in case someone watches it, but like Sent said, it's very dark. Fair enough. Living Daylights has a very Dark Knight-y feel to it though, especially in the first third of the movie. Just the right amount of violence (and also the right amount of abstaining from violence) to make it work like a charm. Hasn't really aged well because of who helps Bond save the day in the end though lol Living Daylights needs context to be watchable, sadly. Luckily I was doing cold-war history at the time so things kinda made sense, but I feel like you're gonna have to watch "For Your Eyes Only" just to get a grasp on General Gogol, which explains the rest of the film. I don't think I actually finished that one. Something just didn't click for me and I can't quite remember what it was. It seemed to make sense from a general Cold War perspective.
I wasn't fond of the Bond Girl very much, and parts of the plot got pretty flat-out stupid at times.
|
|
|
Arium 2-1 Bunny
Arium 2-0 Lilbow
Serral 2-0 Symbol
PtitDrogo 2-1 San
decent day for the myi foreigners so far :D
|
|
|
On July 17 2015 00:45 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2015 00:44 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:41 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:37 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:36 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:33 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:31 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On July 17 2015 00:30 IntoTheheart wrote:On July 17 2015 00:29 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
[quote]
Not one of my favorites. I did like her in Skyfall though. I really liked all of Skyfall. Fantastic 007 film that really brings James Bond into the 21st century. Casino Royale did it nicely as well. Changing the game from baccarat to Texas Hold'em was a very good touch. Yeah, absolutely. I feel like Craig's movies did a much better job modernizing with 007 than the Brosnan movies because Brosnan was all about gadgets, and Craig is all about character. So instead of shoving futuristic gadgets, they just have a contemporary setting where real-world-ish villains exist and try to accomplish real-world-ish things. I mean, real-world-ish essentially means "more grounded than some of the shit Moore's villains wanted to do." Agreed. I like Dalton's for the same reason. They're dark and very realistic.. Living Daylights had a really cool plot and came around the same time as glasnost, and it really highlighted how the US and Soviets put aside their differences to turn on the people who were playing them both for their money. And then Licence to Kill was all about corruption and drugs, and also he set a dude on fire. That was pretty cool. I liked Dalton's films but I felt like maaaaybe they were a bit too violent for Bond. License to Kill would still have been just as good without his brutal murder methods, but maybe that was necessary to explore what happens when Bond gets pushed too far - I won't give away the plot in case someone watches it, but like Sent said, it's very dark. Fair enough. Living Daylights has a very Dark Knight-y feel to it though, especially in the first third of the movie. Just the right amount of violence (and also the right amount of abstaining from violence) to make it work like a charm. Hasn't really aged well because of who helps Bond save the day in the end though lol Living Daylights needs context to be watchable, sadly. Luckily I was doing cold-war history at the time so things kinda made sense, but I feel like you're gonna have to watch "For Your Eyes Only" just to get a grasp on General Gogol, which explains the rest of the film. I don't think I actually finished that one. Something just didn't click for me and I can't quite remember what it was. It seemed to make sense from a general Cold War perspective. I wasn't fond of the Bond Girl very much, and parts of the plot got pretty flat-out stupid at times.
Some of it worked as a bit of comic relief. Maybe my one complaint would be the Oxford-educated Mujaheddin who pretends to be a peasant when he's in jail.
|
On July 17 2015 00:45 nkr wrote:
Arium 2-1 Bunny
Arium 2-0 Lilbow
Serral 2-0 Symbol
PtitDrogo 2-1 San
decent day for the myi foreigners so far :D
Arium better watch it if he keeps beating all the fan favorites he may go on the list with Shine/Sniper!!!
|
|
|
Balliest blink of all time from Ra, right into Borrex's hydras.
Seems to be paying off, supply is even but Ra wins the engage.
|
|
|
Bunny going Marine/Tank. In TvP. In 2015.
|
Bunny 1-0 Lilbow. With tanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GuMiho 2-0 
Reynor
White-Ra 2-1 Borrex
EPT
