|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On June 27 2015 07:16 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:15 Elentos wrote:On June 27 2015 07:14 Aeromi wrote:On June 27 2015 07:13 Ej_ wrote:On June 27 2015 07:13 Alchemik wrote:On June 27 2015 07:12 Ej_ wrote:
"There's no way Soulkey will 7pool on Alterzim again." "there's no way Soulkey will roach/bane me again" "There's no way Soulkey will keep all his mutas in the place that I scanned." Nerchio is a jerk - Stephano "TLO is creative" - Everyone except TLO. Thus making him s creative for saying he's not creative. I know somewhere TLO is having an aneurysm right now
"These fucking tl posters telling me I'm creative!
Fuck em' I'll show them what Kreativity is!"
|
On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win.
I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird.
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On June 27 2015 07:18 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win. I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird.
It's math so = Right
Trust me I'm a physisist
|
look at the masked desperation on Pethighschooldropoutsuses' face
|
On June 27 2015 07:18 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win. I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird.
I dunno, looks fine to me. Then I'm no mathematician.
|
I miss 6pools in ZvZ, sick times were had.
|
|
|
On June 27 2015 07:16 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:15 Elentos wrote:On June 27 2015 07:14 Aeromi wrote:On June 27 2015 07:13 Ej_ wrote:On June 27 2015 07:13 Alchemik wrote:On June 27 2015 07:12 Ej_ wrote:
"There's no way Soulkey will 7pool on Alterzim again." "there's no way Soulkey will roach/bane me again" "There's no way Soulkey will keep all his mutas in the place that I scanned." Nerchio is a jerk - Stephano "TLO is creative" - Everyone except TLO. Thus making him s creative for saying he's not creative. I know somewhere TLO is having an aneurysm right now
i am also saying tlo is not creative. he jsut tries around very much. i could also say "incosistency hidden under the coat of divergence"
|
On June 27 2015 07:19 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:18 Elentos wrote:On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win. I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird. I dunno, looks fine to me. Then I'm no mathematician.
As I said I'm too tired. To the point where only my passion keeps my awake because I can barely read this shit anymore t.t
|
On June 27 2015 07:19 Lorning wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:18 Elentos wrote:On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win. I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird. It's math so = Right Trust me I'm drunk
weow
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On June 27 2015 07:20 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2015 07:19 Lorning wrote:On June 27 2015 07:18 Elentos wrote:On June 27 2015 07:16 KillerDucky wrote:On June 27 2015 07:07 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 07:03 Heartland wrote:On June 27 2015 07:02 sharkie wrote:On June 27 2015 06:58 Heartland wrote:
But seriously, do you guys not see the difference a 100 minerals do in the early game? Of course it's a trade-off, if you lose it doesn't matter, but if you waste a scout every game ever then you'll be behind. I mean, this is what Starcraft is about. So you either take the chance of falling a little behind every game or just losing games outright? I'd rather fall behind and try my best to win than autolose... if I am ahead in 9 games out of 10 and lose 1 game in 10, I think it's an easy choice Losing one game 100% is always bad... Let's put in some numbers: 1/10 games you have a 0% chance to win (auto loss) 9/10 games you have X% chance to win. If 0.9*x >= 0.5 you come out ahead. x = 5/9 = 55.56% Then you need to decide if an extra 100 minerals gives you a 55.56% chance to win. I'm too tired to actually analyze this but this math looks weird. It's math so = Right Trust me I'm drunk weow
Why you underminig me
|
Those are two damn handsome nerds.
|
On June 27 2015 07:19 Ej_ wrote:
I miss 6pools in ZvZ, sick times were had.
"i hope he doesnt see that i place my spine crawler on his creep"
|
On June 27 2015 07:21 Paljas wrote:"i hope he doesnt see that i place my spine crawler on his creep"
from Scarlett vs Jaedong, I learned that you don't have vision on all of your hatchery creep
|
I'm interested to see JD's form, he really had looked much better in his WCS rounds than he was in fall of last year w/ all his traveling
|
On June 27 2015 07:21 Paljas wrote:"i hope he doesnt see that i place my spine crawler on his creep"
It may be the fact that i had a couple of beers or the fact that it's past midnight here
But am i the only one that sees a sex joke in this
|
Holy shit, it feels like it's been a hour since lilbow's game... my "Jaedong game starts celebration" -beer is getting warm!
|
Can Paternostereus overcome JvZ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
