On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
Well he can always ask Sorry for optimal proxy reaper spots for every map.
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
Well he can always ask Sorry for optimal proxy reaper spots for every map.
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
He won that GSL off being mechanically superior to everyone he met (except soO who you know broke down in the finals).
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
He won that GSL off being mechanically superior to everyone he met (except soO who you know broke down in the finals).
I would argue that Cure is perhaps mechanically nearly as good, at least I feel like the TvT wasnt won on mechanics alone.
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
He won that GSL off being mechanically superior to everyone he met (except soO who you know broke down in the finals).
I would argue that Cure is perhaps mechanically nearly as good, at least I feel like the TvT wasnt won on mechanics alone.
Oh Inno's TvT isn't just blind brute strength (in that sense he is similar to Flash), but I never thought to myself during Inno's GSL run (This is a smart strategic move). He mostly just did good moves and tried to out run everyone.
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
He won that GSL off being mechanically superior to everyone he met (except soO who you know broke down in the finals).
I would argue that Cure is perhaps mechanically nearly as good, at least I feel like the TvT wasnt won on mechanics alone.
Oh Inno's TvT isn't just blind brute strength (in that sense he is similar to Flash), but I never thought to myself during Inno's GSL run (This is a smart strategic move). He mostly just did good moves and tried to out run everyone.
That I completly agree with. Sick Mechanics coupled with a few good moves is a strong combo. Sadly he doesnt make a lot of good deciseons often T_T
On April 29 2015 07:22 GumBa wrote: INnoVation wishing he was as good as Qxc
In a way I kind of predicted the fall of Inno in the GOAT list D:
His fall was before that, but now I am interested in how you predicted it?
After he had come up with the most refined builds, he started learning how to micro his units while churning out an endless stream of units. He then came to the realization that if he could put enough pressure and harassment and attack on the opponent that he could take the strategical aspects of SC2 out of the equation and try to force the game into a battle of mechanics, a battle in which he was the superior.
It is that methodical strategic outlook focused on efficiency which has made him the model in which KeSPA teams have tried to mold their terrans into. After all, strategy, tactics, in-game decision making, game sense, those are all things that are extremely hard to develop no matter how many hours you put in. But if you follow the INnoVation model, you are bound to get get results at some point down the line once you master his style of standard play.Yet at the same time this came with a heavy price.
Once he lost his mechanical edge over his opponents he didnt have any answers on how to beat his opponents.
But hadnt he already lost his edge when he won his GSL? Though I agree his biggest strenght has been taken.
He won that GSL off being mechanically superior to everyone he met (except soO who you know broke down in the finals).
I would argue that Cure is perhaps mechanically nearly as good, at least I feel like the TvT wasnt won on mechanics alone.
Oh Inno's TvT isn't just blind brute strength (in that sense he is similar to Flash), but I never thought to myself during Inno's GSL run (This is a smart strategic move). He mostly just did good moves and tried to out run everyone.
I mean, in theory, INnoVation is still superior mechanically than most players though. He shouldn't lose as hard as he has been recently if that was all there's to it.
25905
4624
164
EPT
