|
On February 15 2015 07:55 chipmonklord17 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 07:53 KingofdaHipHop wrote:
i'm sorry but this commmunity is fucking hilarious. the majority asks for region locking so that's what we get and we get a unified wcs (because if they didn't combine it they would suck let's be real) and now they complain about the global aspect of the world championship series. i truly love the internet hey region locked wcs europe wouldn't have sucked. It would have been pretty awesome. Lots of really good europeans. WCS AM however I'm not sure of
i agree WCS EU woulda still been pretty entertaining, but I think blizzard's decision to not screw over the rest of the world and make WCS a real global thing was a good move (personally I liked 2013/2014's system better but I ain't gonna grumble)
|
On February 15 2015 07:55 Megiddosc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 07:50 Die4Ever wrote:On February 15 2015 07:49 Megiddosc wrote:
Then don't watch. If you don't have the ability to stay up to watch some good Starcraft, then don't. You can watch the half that is catered to the European viewers. Can't really say there is anything unfair about a 50/50 split between NA and EU primetime. That's about as "fair" as it gets.
The complaining is amusing as someone who regularly has to alter my sleeping schedule to watch Starcraft though. I'd say a 100/100 or 90/90 "split" is better than a 50/50 split, AM and EU viewership is not mutually exclusive I don't think you quite understand rudimentary mathematics. A "100/100" and a "90/90" percentage split is not achievable.
if 40/40 is anything is possible
|
Snute and uthermal to advance imo.
|
|
|
On February 15 2015 07:56 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 07:55 Megiddosc wrote:On February 15 2015 07:50 Die4Ever wrote:On February 15 2015 07:49 Megiddosc wrote:
Then don't watch. If you don't have the ability to stay up to watch some good Starcraft, then don't. You can watch the half that is catered to the European viewers. Can't really say there is anything unfair about a 50/50 split between NA and EU primetime. That's about as "fair" as it gets.
The complaining is amusing as someone who regularly has to alter my sleeping schedule to watch Starcraft though. I'd say a 100/100 or 90/90 "split" is better than a 50/50 split, AM and EU viewership is not mutually exclusive I don't think you quite understand rudimentary mathematics. A "100/100" and a "90/90" percentage split is not acheivable. I said it's not mutually exclusive, I think I understand mathematics and percentages, thanks
Oh, okay, so you just simply do not have an awareness for what you are reading.
"Can't really say there is anything unfair about a 50/50 split between NA and EU primetime."
This is referring to a split between airing time. 50% of the time WCS will air at North American prime time and 50% of the time WCS will air at European prime time.
Do you now see why your follow up comment makes absolutely no sense? There is no way to air at both 100% NA prime time and 100% EU prime time or 90/90. A 50/50 percentage split as currently utilized is the most "fair" it can be.
|
|
|
|
|
Imma say Astrea first and Xigua second just to be different than everyone else.
|
France7248 Posts
|
On February 15 2015 07:57 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 07:55 chipmonklord17 wrote:On February 15 2015 07:53 KingofdaHipHop wrote:
i'm sorry but this commmunity is fucking hilarious. the majority asks for region locking so that's what we get and we get a unified wcs (because if they didn't combine it they would suck let's be real) and now they complain about the global aspect of the world championship series. i truly love the internet hey region locked wcs europe wouldn't have sucked. It would have been pretty awesome. Lots of really good europeans. WCS AM however I'm not sure of i agree WCS EU woulda still been pretty entertaining, but I think blizzard's decision to not screw over the rest of the world and make WCS a real global thing was a good move (personally I liked 2013/2014's system better but I ain't gonna grumble)
I think if they did wcs eu and wcs am being region locked, but letting china/TW/ect compete in america would have been best. That or going back to the original wcs format
|
On February 15 2015 08:00 Megiddosc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 07:56 Die4Ever wrote:On February 15 2015 07:55 Megiddosc wrote:On February 15 2015 07:50 Die4Ever wrote:On February 15 2015 07:49 Megiddosc wrote:
Then don't watch. If you don't have the ability to stay up to watch some good Starcraft, then don't. You can watch the half that is catered to the European viewers. Can't really say there is anything unfair about a 50/50 split between NA and EU primetime. That's about as "fair" as it gets.
The complaining is amusing as someone who regularly has to alter my sleeping schedule to watch Starcraft though. I'd say a 100/100 or 90/90 "split" is better than a 50/50 split, AM and EU viewership is not mutually exclusive I don't think you quite understand rudimentary mathematics. A "100/100" and a "90/90" percentage split is not acheivable. I said it's not mutually exclusive, I think I understand mathematics and percentages, thanks Oh, okay, so you just simply do not have an awareness for what you are reading. "Can't really say there is anything unfair about a 50/50 split between NA and EU primetime." This is referring to a split between airing time. 50% of the time WCS will air at North American prime time and 50% of the time WCS will air at European prime time. Do you now see why your follow up comment makes absolutely no sense? There is no way to air at both 100% NA prime time and 100% EU prime time or 90/90. A 50/50 percentage split as currently utilized is the most "fair" it can be.
I honestly just don't think "primetime" (I guess you mean 3pm to 10pm or something?) is that important for this community, not on a weekend
and your condescending tone is pretty annoying
|
There is meme potential in Serious Apollo.
|
please tell me they arent going to pronounce it austria....
|
On February 15 2015 08:01 Yhamm wrote:
Frodan back on sc2?
I mean, it makes sense, if ESL is going to retain him, don't want to give him too many offdays?
Serious Apollo in the hype trailer/introduction feels very eerie.
|
On February 15 2015 08:01 Yhamm wrote:
Frodan back on sc2?
ESL Hearthstone's finals are next weekend, so he's been in Burbank for a while.
|
On February 15 2015 08:03 chipmonklord17 wrote:
please tell me they arent going to pronounce it austria....
austria, awstria, aaaaaastria, ayyyystrea
|
|
|
On February 15 2015 08:03 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2015 08:03 chipmonklord17 wrote:
please tell me they arent going to pronounce it austria.... austria, awstria, aaaaaastria, ayyyystrea
the fonz toss?
|
hahaha i missed these two casting <3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
