So the winner can potentially have the same amount of set losses as the loser?
[DreamHack] Winter 2014 - Day 3 - Page 125
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
So the winner can potentially have the same amount of set losses as the loser? | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:09 Video2000 wrote: So now it's confirmed Life 4-0 ForGG easily Did not understand how he could lose to him in the first place anyway. he just said it, he sucks against mech | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8245 Posts
| ||
|
Supersamu
Germany296 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:09 KingofdaHipHop wrote: No and thank goodness, I hate when tournaments do that. But giving the winner's bracket advantage increases the chance that the winner of the tournament was the best player. | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 Fecalfeast wrote: So the winner can potentially have the same amount of set losses as the loser? yeah man | ||
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 Fecalfeast wrote: So the winner can potentially have the same amount of set losses as the loser? Yes, that's possible. | ||
|
mierin
United States4943 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 kaykoose wrote: Oh shit. ForGG beat him but gets no advantage? Why do people keep saying this? Life's disadvantage was having to play another best of 5 against someone with the chance of getting knocked out. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:09 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Definitely Life and Nestea for top two Zergs of all SC2 history (although I'm not sure who's technically in first). Life is very clearly better unless you weigh GSL way too high | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 Supersamu wrote: But giving the winner's bracket advantage increases the chance that the winner of the tournament was the best player. Winners bracket advantage is that that player doesn't have to play another extremely difficult best of 5 and face elimination. | ||
|
Poopfeast 024
Gambia437 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:07 SatedSC2 wrote: Wow. Headset too tight is a weird new excuse. I noticed that Life uses "very big" inEars stuff so ofcourse Headset is too tight. | ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
| ||
|
kaykoose
United States2302 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 mierin wrote: Why do people keep saying this? Life's disadvantage was having to play another best of 5 against someone with the chance of getting knocked out. Because that's how it usually works? | ||
|
Superbanana
2369 Posts
| ||
|
Faefae
2203 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:10 kaykoose wrote: Oh shit. ForGG beat him but gets no advantage? I think it's kind of silly as well. It's double elim but if he loses 1 times he's out :/ Having a 1map advantage or something seems sensible imo | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:11 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: This is the filleriest filler ever I don't know about that, toothbrushes are important! | ||
|
Supersamu
Germany296 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:11 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Winners bracket advantage is that that player doesn't have to play another extremely difficult best of 5 and face elimination. But one of the two players in the loser's bracket is guaranteed to play in the finals... | ||
|
Video2000
Denmark517 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:09 The_Templar wrote: He just said it's not easy though, so maybe there's another reason ForGG won! :D We will see. I would like to see Life play a "proper" swarm host game actually, classic challenge vs mech. Dont know how often he does it vs terran but he seems very confident with it on nimbus vP. Also, he HAS to do one early pool, from the last 20 ZvT's I have seen I think he has gone hatch first? | ||
| ||
Did not understand how he could lose to him in the first place anyway.