|
On September 05 2014 20:03 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:02 herMan wrote:On September 05 2014 20:02 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
That top base from Flash was totally exposed the entire time... soO could have baneling'd that so easily and just won. Artosis touched on that by saying that he can't bust it because flash's counterattack would just roll him. The SCV's, not the base itself. 3 or 4 banelings could have hit them.
should be 6-8+ cause it is a plantery, but he could easily kill it off and sacrifice 1 expansion for that
|
soO broke his computer with his crazy APM?
|
On September 05 2014 20:03 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:02 andilaama wrote:I had three cookies and was supposed to eat one cookie per game, only I thought soO looked good this game so ate the third cookie (presuming soO 2-0s). Now I have no cookie for the third game  You jinxed it
I feel bad, but not too bad since I'm cheering for Flash. Besides that game was awesome and two cookie level, at the very least.
|
like I said, a soO v Flash finals bo7 would be great
|
On September 05 2014 20:04 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:03 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On September 05 2014 20:02 herMan wrote:On September 05 2014 20:02 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
That top base from Flash was totally exposed the entire time... soO could have baneling'd that so easily and just won. Artosis touched on that by saying that he can't bust it because flash's counterattack would just roll him. The SCV's, not the base itself. 3 or 4 banelings could have hit them. How did JDvHerO end up?
JD won 2-0
|
On September 05 2014 20:01 Valikyr wrote:
The level of these games are stupid.
yeah that was the main problem in WoL too. Very frustiating to watch at that high level play but with stupid design/mechanic and "one small mistake can be unforgiving" play.
|
On September 05 2014 20:04 [Silverflame] wrote:
I like how soO capped at roughly 850 APM several times... and we are speaking of SC2. Insane.
s->zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Flash drinking his juice box :3
|
On September 05 2014 20:02 bo1b wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:01 juvenal wrote:On September 05 2014 19:55 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:53 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:50 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:48 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:46 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:45 Glorfindel! wrote:
[quote]
How is a player with that win streak "over rated"?
What do you have to accomplish in Starcraft to be accepted as a top level player?
Check his match history, and please explain why anyone not should rate him high.
If you can do that, I perhaps can understand your logic.
Until then, you just look like a real bad hater. Having watched pretty much every one of those games the majority featured some hilarious fail from his opponents, and if you think I need to win a gsl to call someone being called a god (in a game which he's accomplished nothing overrated) then you're out of your mind. Does not every game when you win have faults from the opponent? That quite much is a given for every SC2-game I have ever watched. The player who loses makes some hilarious fails, the one who makes the least wins the game.... True vs Flash is now on the list in his latest streak of wins, to put it in perspective. Winning in GSL Round 16 is always good. And winning vs a player who does not play good does not make his other games bad? Or what logic am I not understanding. If Flash beats Huk the next tournament, it was not impressive beating Zest and Parting cause Huk is not as good? Yes, flash beating huk is not as impressive as flashing beating parting. That's pretty basic logic. But Flash beating Parting, Zest and Huk is better than Flash beating Parting and Zest, right? The point I'm arguing is that a list of names he's beaten says nothing about the quality of those games or if there were hilarious mistakes involved. Snute vs Flash comes to mind. drg vs genius comes to mind, bro Yep, every drg fan knows his zvp is shit
the point is: mistakes are everywhere. Didn't it come to your mind Flash only lost the first game due to his own mistake? See what I'm doing?
|
United States97276 Posts
On September 05 2014 20:05 PerSe wrote:
like I said, a soO v Flash finals bo7 would be great
bo7 semifinal might be better but it couldnt happen
|
On September 05 2014 20:02 andilaama wrote:I had three cookies and was supposed to eat one cookie per game, only I thought soO looked good this game so ate the third cookie (presuming soO 2-0s). Now I have no cookie for the third game
That was definitely a game worthy of 2 cookies.
|
On September 05 2014 20:04 bo1b wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:02 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:55 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:53 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:50 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:48 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:46 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:45 Glorfindel! wrote:
[quote]
How is a player with that win streak "over rated"?
What do you have to accomplish in Starcraft to be accepted as a top level player?
Check his match history, and please explain why anyone not should rate him high.
If you can do that, I perhaps can understand your logic.
Until then, you just look like a real bad hater. Having watched pretty much every one of those games the majority featured some hilarious fail from his opponents, and if you think I need to win a gsl to call someone being called a god (in a game which he's accomplished nothing overrated) then you're out of your mind. Does not every game when you win have faults from the opponent? That quite much is a given for every SC2-game I have ever watched. The player who loses makes some hilarious fails, the one who makes the least wins the game.... True vs Flash is now on the list in his latest streak of wins, to put it in perspective. Winning in GSL Round 16 is always good. And winning vs a player who does not play good does not make his other games bad? Or what logic am I not understanding. If Flash beats Huk the next tournament, it was not impressive beating Zest and Parting cause Huk is not as good? Yes, flash beating huk is not as impressive as flashing beating parting. That's pretty basic logic. But Flash beating Parting, Zest and Huk is better than Flash beating Parting and Zest, right? The point I'm arguing is that a list of names he's beaten says nothing about the quality of those games or if there were hilarious mistakes involved. Snute vs Flash comes to mind. Well how can you not think this is great Terran play from Flash? If this is a terran being "over rated". What good Terrans do we have? The next player that has a group of people bow to him and thank him for leading the way in playing terran, or have half the forum proclaim him as god or some other stupid epithet will be over rated. You could say flash is probably the best terran in the world and I wouldn't give a shit tbh, because he probably is.
To bowing was certainly cringeworthy; I'll give you that
|
On September 05 2014 20:04 bo1b wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:02 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:55 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:53 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:52 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:50 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:48 Glorfindel! wrote:On September 05 2014 19:46 bo1b wrote:On September 05 2014 19:45 Glorfindel! wrote:
[quote]
How is a player with that win streak "over rated"?
What do you have to accomplish in Starcraft to be accepted as a top level player?
Check his match history, and please explain why anyone not should rate him high.
If you can do that, I perhaps can understand your logic.
Until then, you just look like a real bad hater. Having watched pretty much every one of those games the majority featured some hilarious fail from his opponents, and if you think I need to win a gsl to call someone being called a god (in a game which he's accomplished nothing overrated) then you're out of your mind. Does not every game when you win have faults from the opponent? That quite much is a given for every SC2-game I have ever watched. The player who loses makes some hilarious fails, the one who makes the least wins the game.... True vs Flash is now on the list in his latest streak of wins, to put it in perspective. Winning in GSL Round 16 is always good. And winning vs a player who does not play good does not make his other games bad? Or what logic am I not understanding. If Flash beats Huk the next tournament, it was not impressive beating Zest and Parting cause Huk is not as good? Yes, flash beating huk is not as impressive as flashing beating parting. That's pretty basic logic. But Flash beating Parting, Zest and Huk is better than Flash beating Parting and Zest, right? The point I'm arguing is that a list of names he's beaten says nothing about the quality of those games or if there were hilarious mistakes involved. Snute vs Flash comes to mind. Well how can you not think this is great Terran play from Flash? If this is a terran being "over rated". What good Terrans do we have? The next player that has a group of people bow to him and thank him for leading the way in playing terran, or have half the forum proclaim him as god or some other stupid epithet will be over rated. You could say flash is probably the best terran in the world and I wouldn't give a shit tbh, because he probably is.
Then why is it weird that Terran fans call their best player for God?
|
and not thinking of upgrading when having advantage is quite a silly mistake
|
On September 05 2014 20:05 andilaama wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 20:03 Penev wrote:On September 05 2014 20:02 andilaama wrote:I had three cookies and was supposed to eat one cookie per game, only I thought soO looked good this game so ate the third cookie (presuming soO 2-0s). Now I have no cookie for the third game You jinxed it I feel bad, but not too bad since I'm cheering for Flash. Besides that game was awesome and two cookie level, at the very least.
We should really rate games in cookies instead of star from now on
|
Has Flash give up on mech TvZ?
|
Vertical spawns...and now Flash is cursed.
|
|
|
|
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
537
160
211
149
EPT
