[WCS] Global Finals 2013 Day 2 - Page 159
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Non-twitch stream: http://eu.battle.net/blizzcon/en/live-stream/ DO NOT! unleash the sheep army. Quoting them is the same as posting them. Stop the balance whine or bans will be handed out like candy. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45246 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10137 Posts
| ||
|
Marcinko
South Africa1014 Posts
Fixed it for you. | ||
|
SkullZ9
Belgium2048 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:37 3point14 wrote: whats gonna happen if JD gets another second finish? won't happen. Jaedong's got the crowd behind him! | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
Lunareste
United States3596 Posts
BONJWA | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8245 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:37 Zealously wrote: wat and why do people compare a game with 10-20 times as many players (that's also free to play and easy to learn) to a fairly hardcore game like Starcraft? I just don't get it LoL is hardly easy to learn. You obviously haven't played enough. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:33 geokilla wrote: Still nothing compared to at least 1.5 million for LoL LCS finals. What is the obsession with needing our game to be the most popular? We can enjoy it just fine without being #1. | ||
|
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:37 ladysman09 wrote: Are you saying in Season 1, a player like Innovation is not more skilled than sOs? Innovation was number 1 at that time. Was that useless? No, it was not. Because Innovation achieved that number 1 WCS rank by skill, therefore WCS rankings determine how skilled or unskilled a player is. If they are not skilled enough to surpass certain players, then they are less skilled than them. Oh and another thing to note is that Innovation wasn't #1 until he won Season 1 - Soulkey was. | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:37 Zealously wrote: wat and why do people compare a game with 10-20 times as many players (that's also free to play and easy to learn) to a fairly hardcore game like Starcraft? I just don't get it Because numbers are easy to process and require no consideration of other factors. | ||
|
75
Germany4057 Posts
| ||
|
WerderBremen
Germany1070 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
| ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
| ||
|
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:39 geokilla wrote: LoL is hardly easy to learn. You obviously haven't played enough. I've played a good 1200 games thank you | ||
|
Darrkhan
Finland1236 Posts
On November 10 2013 06:34 _SpiRaL_ wrote: It's ridiculous. If you could look up the bookies odds Bomber was in no way the big favourite in that match. Referencing old wins only has some impact on the likliehood of either player winning. Idd. Points do not matter at all. Pretty much everyone in blizzcon had good shot at going really far at the tournament. SC2 is really stacked with good players, even if lets say Maru beats Jaedong it might be totally different story next time they meet. You shouldn't pay too much attention to the previous games. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
| ||