|
On August 25 2013 02:00 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:56 BackSideAttack wrote:On August 25 2013 01:54 bo1b wrote:On August 25 2013 01:51 BackSideAttack wrote:On August 25 2013 01:47 bo1b wrote:
People wonder why eg-tl was so hyped to do well in proleague when the potential that some of the players on that combined team is insane You know doing well at a foreign tournament when you are used to traveling is completely different than Proleague. Not only do the Kespa players care more about Proleague, they have an entire organization complete with experienced staff there to prepare every player for every game. Couple that with no traveling, which the kespa players are obviously not used to as evidenced by numerous interviews at previous MLG events. Taeja has tremendous experience playing these weekend tournaments and frequently travels. He obviously is going to do better in these games than bo1 games where you spend an entire week practicing for. I get that, but the players just played like trash comparatively to what they'd played like before. Taeja's only just getting back into that groove of stomping everyone. I'm mega biased too, so excuse my giddyness :D Well yeah its a different format. Plus even if EG-TL had the same proleague resources as Kespa, they still wouldn't be able to do as well because of commitments to streaming and traveling to foreign tournaments. Also Rain played pretty poorly in these games, especially when he walked into the open with those collosus in game 2. Well, I guess that is why EG-TL did poorly in Proleague, because their players focused on individual leagues. For people making excuses for Kespa players doing poorly, the same can be applied to EG-TL for Proleague.
EG-TL did poorly in PL for a variety of reasons, including lack of depth, Taeja being injured, lack of team cohesion, etc.
|
On August 25 2013 01:58 Abominous wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:57 StarStruck wrote:On August 25 2013 01:45 Zealously wrote:
Called it (almost)
Rain not playing as well as he can though Dude hasn't been playing well since Round 4 of PL and he wasn't helping SKT1 either in the clutch. Makes me wonder why they kept sending him out as the last guy. Because just in the middle of the last round of proleague he had over 70% win rate...
Go through the statistics again. In the last round he was less than 50% in Ace Matches. I find it hard to believe that you would be trying to make an argument for Round 6 when in reality he fumbled more in round 5 and 6 then he did in round 4. Please make some sense.
|
On August 25 2013 02:00 lichter wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Disengaged wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Arco wrote:On August 25 2013 01:51 Muffloe wrote:On August 25 2013 01:50 Arco wrote:On August 25 2013 01:49 Muffloe wrote:On August 25 2013 01:48 Arco wrote:On August 25 2013 01:46 LogiiK wrote:
where is kespa ? Jaedong, hi. EG bro 8 years as a KeSPA player, bro. Then why do you count parting as kespa? such hypocrisy, is unbeleviable... Where did I say that? If you want to get technical, Parting was a practice partner for eStro. You see that? Thats the point. Flying over your head. Flying was also on eSTRO
I expected it. I still spat all over the screen.
|
Austria24417 Posts
On August 25 2013 02:01 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 02:01 Wintex wrote:On August 25 2013 02:00 Shellshock1122 wrote:
Scarlett vs Jaedong bo7 6 pools every game why would they make 6 pools every game? :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD lots of late game harass. they're only 200 minerals so I think it's fine to make multiple pools so you dont get screwed by losing your only one
For double upgrades
|
On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (9999)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 0-3 Bomber
fixed
|
Whem will the semis be played tomorrow?
|
On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 1-3 Bomber fixed
She's beat him before in a bo3.
|
On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 0-3 Bomber fixed
No bias detected~
|
excellent introduction there by redeye.
Gogo scarlett
|
United States97276 Posts
On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 1-3 Bomber fixed
100% chance for scarlett to 3-0 but 33% chance for bomber to win in any way. Bomber fan math logic
|
On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 0-3 Bomber fixed
Pretty sure you got it the wrong way around
|
On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
12.53% 3-0 0-3 12.47%
18.78% 3-1 1-3 18.72%
18.77% 3-2 2-3 18.73%
---------------------------------------------
50.08% 49.92%
Median outcome: Scarlett 3-2 Bomber
Why is it so close?
As far as I remember I haven't seen Bomber winning a TvZ in quite some time (Ok, he beat Shine in S1). Not because he had insanely good opponents, but because he played something between sloppy and fucking horrible.
|
On August 25 2013 02:02 StarStruck wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Abominous wrote:On August 25 2013 01:57 StarStruck wrote:On August 25 2013 01:45 Zealously wrote:
Called it (almost)
Rain not playing as well as he can though Dude hasn't been playing well since Round 4 of PL and he wasn't helping SKT1 either in the clutch. Makes me wonder why they kept sending him out as the last guy. Because just in the middle of the last round of proleague he had over 70% win rate... Go through the statistics again. In the last round he was less than 50% in Ace Matches. I find it hard to believe that you would be trying to make an argument for Round 6 when in reality he fumbled more in round 5 and 6 then he did in round 4. Please make some sense.
As an aside, half the posts I see from you are you arguing that Rain is a poor clutch / ace player. It's kind of funny to see
|
is that enough crowd for you now? -.-
|
Bomber is definately amazing right now, but Scarlett is great too, and she had a group with 3 terrans already. So I hope this (the practice) will get her through
|
On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (9999)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 0-3 Bomber fixed
I call bullshit on that one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 25 2013 02:03 iAmJeffReY wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 02:02 Wintex wrote:On August 25 2013 01:58 Boucot wrote:Ho ho ho ho (1726) Scarlett 0-0 Bomber (1725)
---------------------------------------------
100% 3-0 0-3 33.33%
0% 3-1 1-3 33.33%
0% 3-2 2-3 33.33%
---------------------------------------------
0% 100%
Median outcome: Scarlett 1-3 Bomber fixed She's beat him before in a bo3.
But terrans got widow mines and bombervacs now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
