|
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you.
You're mad because you're a bad player and your idol lost.
|
On July 11 2013 20:03 BlueFlames wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:01 tribulator wrote: So I guess that means we should see Flash at pretty much any event that offers WCS points from here on out too... unless KT doesn't feel like letting him try to qualify for the finals. Skipping this last MLG probably stings right now. KT the team cares about Pro-league. Everything else is a joke compared to that, monetary wise and for their sponsors. The reason those kespa teams exist is pro-league. But i bet Flash would love to go. Sweet dreams you are having here ! Perhaps you should pinch yourself :D
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you. Yep, his macro was sooooo inferior in game 2 he was 40 supply ahead in army size with equal SCV counts at 10'. I know you're probably a disappointed Flash fanboy, but please.
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you.
Go watch something else then.
|
United States97274 Posts
SKT has had an extremely shitty week in WCS KR. Hopefully Fantasy can turn it around
|
On July 11 2013 20:02 goody153 wrote: scouting fail by flash .. anyways nice game for bomber .. and i hate tvt nowadays not because of imbalance but marine-tank is miles better than the new tvt .. marine-tank shows micro + positioning Have to disagree with that, marine/tank was pretty much figured out and it was always the same dancing around and trying to get an engagement. Biggest way to differ from your opponent was to get faster upgrades.
|
Canada16217 Posts
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you. No bomber won because he was smarter. That's real life for you.
|
On July 11 2013 20:02 sc2superfan101 wrote: Flash's TvT has become a problem, methinks. He looks a little lost in the matchup.
Bomber..... goddamnit.... just had to make this WCS boring didn't you?
Sorry, in what world were either of those games boring?
I mean, they weren't the best, but we've all seen way worse.
|
On July 11 2013 20:03 BackSideAttack wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 TeeTS wrote:On July 11 2013 19:58 BackSideAttack wrote: ..............i hate bomber so much right now...why couldn't he have just played standard and lose mechanically to flash I don't see a big mechanically difference between Bomber and Flash (in SC2!). Bomber never loses to bad mechanics, he allways bombs out with really weird decisions and strategies, when he does lose. GG Bomber, very happy for him data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Uhh there's a huge mechanical difference between the 2. Bomber is one of the worst micro terrans in sc2 right now, while flash is one of the best. There's a reason why Bomber plays turtle mech style in tvz- he has some of the worst splitting i've ever seen. There's also a clear difference between the 2's ability to multitask. When bomber drops he just shift clicks and doesn't pay attention. Flash actually microes all his individual drops similar to innovation. Although I'm not supposed to say anything, I kinda have to give my neutral answer to this.
You are wrong.
|
Ah, no wonder. I guess there's always next round.
Really well played by Bomber though, deserving of the victory for sure.
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 BlueFlames wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you. If thats not sarcasm, you are stupid.
I'm pretty sure you could ask any sc2 pro player in Korea and they would most likely say that Flash is the better player.
|
On July 11 2013 19:57 Snowbear wrote: Tasteless must feel so ashamed to call bomber tier 3.
This was my exact thought. Tier 3 player in RO8, ok Tasteless uhhuh sure, smart one.
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you.
Im a fan of Flash, but let's be honest, he was studied and beaten straight up. Bomber played smart and better.
So sc2 allows the lesser mechanical player to win thanks to good preparation and strategic thinking? Get over it.
|
On July 11 2013 20:03 Lorning wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:03 LittleRedBoy wrote: This "Bomber's Law" nonsense is stupid. He's won Code A, dreamhack, and MLG. There are plenty of players who have never won a tournament. Stop making sense. Nothing makes sense in the LR thread, its like the Twilight zone
They were just set ups for bigger dissapointments. The Bomber's law stands.
On July 11 2013 20:06 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:03 BackSideAttack wrote:On July 11 2013 20:00 TeeTS wrote:On July 11 2013 19:58 BackSideAttack wrote: ..............i hate bomber so much right now...why couldn't he have just played standard and lose mechanically to flash I don't see a big mechanically difference between Bomber and Flash (in SC2!). Bomber never loses to bad mechanics, he allways bombs out with really weird decisions and strategies, when he does lose. GG Bomber, very happy for him data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Uhh there's a huge mechanical difference between the 2. Bomber is one of the worst micro terrans in sc2 right now, while flash is one of the best. There's a reason why Bomber plays turtle mech style in tvz- he has some of the worst splitting i've ever seen. There's also a clear difference between the 2's ability to multitask. When bomber drops he just shift clicks and doesn't pay attention. Flash actually microes all his individual drops similar to innovation. Although I'm not supposed to say anything, I kinda have to give my neutral answer to this. You are wrong.
What the hell is that MVP banner ? Can i be the number 1 fanboy of Bomber now on your days of the week ?
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 Fjodorov wrote: I wondering what timing Bomber had in his head before he lost a ton of scvs to the blueflame hellions. Because Bomber HAD to attack after that but was that his plan all along? Or did Flash kill himself in a way by doing that hellion runby? :o
Probably killed himself in a way, because he lost nearly all of his blue flame hellions to do that runby.
Imagine that push comes and Flash has a better idea of the composition Bomber is using, and MANY MANY more Blue Flame Hellions dealing damage.
|
On July 11 2013 20:06 Hall0wed wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 19:57 Snowbear wrote: Tasteless must feel so ashamed to call bomber tier 3. This was my exact thought. Tier 3 player in RO8, ok Tasteless uhhuh sure, smart one.
finals = T1, Rof 4 = tier 2, Round of 8 = T3.
Tasteless always right.
|
SC2 is a game where you can't just play like an idiot robot
|
On July 11 2013 20:06 BackSideAttack wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:04 BlueFlames wrote:On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you. If thats not sarcasm, you are stupid. I'm pretty sure you could ask any sc2 pro player in Korea and they would most likely say that Flash is the better player. Yes, Flash is overall better. But today, Bomber came with the perfect preparation, metagaming Flash's predictable play, and won.
|
On July 11 2013 20:04 DustbinBieber wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2013 20:00 Qwerty85 wrote:On July 11 2013 19:59 DustbinBieber wrote:On July 11 2013 19:57 29 fps wrote: why do English casters keep saying some people are "supposed" to lose?? it's starting to become annoying because it's true. I think he is talking about the situation when you have Bomber vs. Flash and people say Bomber is supposed to lose because Flash is allegedly a superior player.. Flash is a superior player and Bomber was supposed to lose. He won with two weird-ass tactics because of his straight-up inferiority. That's SC2 for you.
"The player I wanted to win ended up losing! It's SC2's fault!"
|
|
|
|
|