EPTMaybe the guy is just not a MC fan.
[Code S] RO32 Group B 2013 WCS Korea Season 1 - Page 74
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
sashkata
Bulgaria3241 Posts
Maybe the guy is just not a MC fan. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:21 liberate71 wrote: Cause he very openly bagged the arse off it when it was first announced  Still a bit silly to be happy about it though wow if that's true then that's pretty lame BM he's a blizzard employee, way to be openly BM | ||
|
Sakray
France2198 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:18 Thinasy wrote: This whine is hilarious, he lost the base trade cause he was behind the WHOLE game, not because of mutas being OP...... Christ Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Every. Single. Fucking. Game. With huge winrate because a Protoss can't split his army efficiently to deal with both mutas in main and ground army in expands. As Protoss, because tech is insanely expensive, you can't afford to harass by sending a portion of your army in mineral lines, and your main part in expands. You're going to say "oracles", to that I answer no, because ground without tech just dies to almost everything if you don't have like godlike micro and infinite forcefields. | ||
|
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:21 liberate71 wrote: Cause he very openly bagged the arse off it when it was first announced Still a bit silly to be happy about it though If that's the reason then it's kinda sad, most of MC's points were pretty worth bringing up imo :/ | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:20 opterown wrote: wait, why would blizzard employees be happy about this lol Woot as in Wtf. | ||
|
suicideyear
Ivory Coast3016 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:23 Sakray wrote: Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Every. Single. Fucking. Game. With huge winrate because a Protoss can't split his army efficiently to deal with both mutas in main and ground army in expands. As Protoss, because tech is insanely expensive, you can't afford to harass by sending a portion of your army in mineral lines, and your main part in expands. You're going to say "oracles", to that I answer no, because ground without tech just dies to almost everything if you don't have like godlike micro and infinite forcefields. you guys should do more all-ins or something PvZ has been dumb since 2011 since the... you know, that patch | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27111 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:23 Sakray wrote: Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Every. Single. Fucking. Game. With huge winrate because a Protoss can't split his army efficiently to deal with both mutas in main and ground army in expands. As Protoss, because tech is insanely expensive, you can't afford to harass by sending a portion of your army in mineral lines, and your main part in expands. You're going to say "oracles", to that I answer no, because ground without tech just dies to almost everything if you don't have like godlike micro and infinite forcefields. Phoenixes are pretty good against mutas last I checked. Ground-based stalker into temp defenses don't really work though, at all. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10152 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:23 Sakray wrote: Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Every. Single. Fucking. Game. With huge winrate because a Protoss can't split his army efficiently to deal with both mutas in main and ground army in expands. As Protoss, because tech is insanely expensive, you can't afford to harass by sending a portion of your army in mineral lines, and your main part in expands. You're going to say "oracles", to that I answer no, because ground without tech just dies to almost everything if you don't have like godlike micro and infinite forcefields. We need to see how is the winrate of games with more than 15 mutas for ZvP. | ||
|
roym899
Germany426 Posts
Where the fuck is he "happy about this"? | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:18 Thinasy wrote: This whine is hilarious, he lost the base trade cause he was behind the WHOLE game, not because of mutas being OP...... Christ That's how balance whine works. Mutas were the reason MC lost to Life at MLG. MC lost to his own build in PvP and he lost to the same thing that cost him a tournament like a month ago. Makes me wonder. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
Indeed. Itzik Ben-Bassat @ibenbassat 3m @Frog_sox I am a big fan of MC, I'm just shocked. | ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
Yeah, we really should consider this the more likely situation than a Blizzard employee being aggressively BM about a pro player. What am I saying, pitchforks are already on the move :/ | ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:24 Godwrath wrote: We need to see how is the winrate of games with more than 15 mutas for ZvP. Or games with more than 10 ravens. Ravens imba!!! | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12474 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:23 Sakray wrote: Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Rofl so what? Before HotS there was an OP composition, obv people were going to go for it. Just because something else was better doesn't mean mutas were bad... | ||
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
Woot = yay | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:24 Godwrath wrote: We need to see how is the winrate of games with more than 15 mutas for ZvP. And where Protoss bumps his all in should not even be considered for that ^^ | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
You are reading too much into a tweet. | ||
|
rothsbury
Australia1654 Posts
On April 09 2013 21:23 Sakray wrote: Your post is hilarious, do you realise before HotS, there was almost no-muta play, but since release, how often do we see mutas ZvP ? Every. Single. Fucking. Game. With huge winrate because a Protoss can't split his army efficiently to deal with both mutas in main and ground army in expands. As Protoss, because tech is insanely expensive, you can't afford to harass by sending a portion of your army in mineral lines, and your main part in expands. You're going to say "oracles", to that I answer no, because ground without tech just dies to almost everything if you don't have like godlike micro and infinite forcefields. There was plenty of muta play in WOL ZvP. And Protoss made the same complaints that you're making now. Not sure why oracles would be the solution to mutas; blizzard obviously intend phoenix to be with the range buff and range upgrade; maybe that's what you meant. I do think the muta speed + regen buffs were unnecessary, but come on man. You in particular can't balance whine about this game because MC got waaay behind with his failed attack. His defeat was only a matter of time. | ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
Woot = "What!?!" Can be used to express disbelief just as much as joy. | ||
| ||
