EPTSC2BW Weekly $100 - Page 11
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
llIH
Norway2147 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On February 18 2013 07:04 MavercK wrote: had to revoke that change because it was only accurate with low scv count, once you got a high number of workers the mining rate was alot slower than it should be. i'll have to think about another way to deal with SCVs i only just got to work (tournament was at 5am for me). i'll go over the VODs soonish. any feedback feel free to PM me, i'd be very grateful. Can you not just make it so that after a SCV mines a crystal, there is a SLIGHT pause after it has the crystal in hand? Like as soon as it mines it, maybe it moves at 80% speed for 1 second? (Imagine it getting hit by conc shell in SC2 but it only lasts for 1-2 seconds). | ||
|
MorowZ
Canada56 Posts
| ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3769 Posts
1st: 100% cash 2nd: pride | ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On February 18 2013 17:57 nimdil wrote: Considering how much MorroW is dominating these Weeklies, maybe the prize pool shouldn't be: 1st: 100% cash 2nd: pride need a challenger  | ||
|
nimdil
Poland3769 Posts
And I updated brackets on LP so check if there are any errors:  SC2BW Weekly/2 | ||
|
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
MavercK, how many games of ZvT/PvT were played testing out the slower SCVs? How many games (played on a high level on both ends, in both games) have been played and analyzed so far to compare SC2:BW to SC:BW in total? | ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On February 18 2013 18:18 LRM)TechnicS wrote: I don't know what more to say anymore. MavercK, how many games of ZvT/PvT were played testing out the slower SCVs? How many games (played on a high level on both ends, in both games) have been played and analyzed so far to compare SC2:BW to SC:BW in total? games played? not sure, i updated the map at the beginning of the week on EU and then did a minor patch to undo it a day or two before hand. i dont have any testers other than myself and anyone who decides to post feedback. this weekly tournament has been the BEST source of information so far. my findings with the previous settings were 1 worker to 1 mineral patch = identical to BW. but 12 or more and the mining rate got WAY out of control. i was like 1k short on minerals in only a few minutes time. i've looked at it again and found more favorable settings. the previous values i had were probes - 2.25 acceleration drones - 1.75 acceleration SCV - 1.25 acceleration. my NEW values are. 2.25, 2.0, 1.75. i've also added a 0.5 second delay where the worker will stop at the CC/Nexus/Hatchery before returning to the mineral patch. with these new settings and following. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=83287 as a guide (aswell as BW) these settings are almost perfect. im out by a maximum of 100-200 minerals by the 5 minute mark on all races. im still looking at SCVs however. right now workers are immune to the pathing difficulties that other units suffer from. which is i think why they are so strong. unfortunately it's not so easy to apply this handicap to workers and NOT have it affect them while mining. but i will find a way. im sorry you wern't notified before the tournament, i will do better next time and announce any changes before hand. | ||
|
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
| ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:18 LRM)TechnicS wrote: Has this same testing been applied to SC:BW too? will be testing that tomorrow, gotta goto sleep before work  | ||
|
nimdil
Poland3769 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:18 LRM)TechnicS wrote: Has this same testing been applied to SC:BW too? Are you really asking if mod created by one person was tested as extensively as official expansion created by powerful company? o_O | ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:34 nimdil wrote: Are you really asking if mod created by one person was tested as extensively as official expansion created by powerful company? o_O nah hes making sure i compared my findings against BW to ensure they are accurate (instead of relying on an article someone wrote years ago). | ||
|
nimdil
Poland3769 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:42 MavercK wrote: nah hes making sure i compared my findings against BW to ensure they are accurate (instead of relying on an article someone wrote years ago). Ah, that wasn't very obvious | ||
|
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
I will probably have time to join and test some stuff super rarely in the next 2-3 weeks, and probably more after that. If I'm at least not uneager to do it, that is. And after these two tournaments, i'm rather frustrated and very demotivated. | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
 . | ||
|
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
Replay pack from SC2BW #2: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pow8nw5o701fmwl/Tourney3501_Replays.zip | ||
| ||
