|
On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal".
good fungals = catch a couple of units
BEAUTIFUL FUNGALS = catch the whole army
Apparently, you cant really go wrong with fungals 
|
I hope they pick it up if Im gonna skip today's lecture...
|
540 Posts
''Dat fungals!" 
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal".
It was technically a good fungal considering Noblesse had 20 marines total.
|
On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal".
It was good because it stopped the marines from getting within attack range of the Broodlords while keeping them within the Broodlords firing range.
|
what were these game-ending, back-breaking mistakes that noblesse did, in people's opinion?
|
On January 31 2013 18:35 Qwerty85 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal". good fungals = catch a couple of units BEAUTIFUL FUNGALS = catch the whole army Apparently, you cant really go wrong with fungals
Fungals imba. Everything is good. Even if it misses completely. 
|
impressive that Soulkey can play like that on a non pl map imo.
|
On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal".
Considering how few units it was possible to catch in that situation, it was pretty good.
|
I liked the proxyrax from noblesse. It worked and there fore better 2rax. Only bad thing was he didnt win eventually.
|
So, how's TvZ these days?
Some nice trades, some good splits, some positional fighting, drops sometimes do something, sometimes get deflected.
And then broodlords.
|
On January 31 2013 18:36 pdd wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 18:35 Qwerty85 wrote:On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal". good fungals = catch a couple of units BEAUTIFUL FUNGALS = catch the whole army Apparently, you cant really go wrong with fungals Fungals imba. Everything is good. Even if it misses completely.
When fungals miss, they are still good because they 'zone' out the enemy...
|
Norway25712 Posts
On January 31 2013 18:36 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal". It was technically a good fungal considering Noblesse had 20 marines total.
No, this was earlier in the game when Nobless was shutting down Soulkey's third. It was a tiny fraction of an army.
|
I feel like there is no real late game with soulkey
he always forces a micro game
I never saw him playing with 10 BL 20 infestors...
and that's nice
|
Austria24422 Posts
On January 31 2013 18:38 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 18:36 pdd wrote:On January 31 2013 18:35 Qwerty85 wrote:On January 31 2013 18:34 KristofferAG wrote:
Is it normal to call bad fungals good these days? I mean, that one hit like 6 marines and was considered a "good fungal". Legit question. I haven't watched SC2 in moonths, when I last watched that would've been a "pretty bad fungal". good fungals = catch a couple of units BEAUTIFUL FUNGALS = catch the whole army Apparently, you cant really go wrong with fungals Fungals imba. Everything is good. Even if it misses completely. When fungals miss, they are still good because they 'zone' out the enemy...
Lol
Pretty bad game... honestly this group has the potential to be REAAAALLY bad if nestea only all ins and taeja can't perform.
|
France12904 Posts
On January 31 2013 18:36 n0ise wrote:
what were these game-ending, back-breaking mistakes that noblesse did, in people's opinion?
He should have lifted up some buildings in his main base and attacked in two fronts (one with the eight marines) asap without losing tanks pointlessly, before corruptors and more lings got there so he could have killed at least BL and probably the infestors too. It wasn't gonna make him win the game yet, but he would have been in a more decent spot than this : "wait for it.. wait for it.. let some tank die.. let him reinforce.. stim and go without lifting up and on one front".
|
It doesn't matter if they're easy to land or not, if they win you the fight they're still good fungals. It's like if marines kill zerglings with a-move, then the casters could say: "some good hits with those marines".
|
lol.. 380 minerals.. "starport."
XD
|
Just arrived at home, and noticed around that tastosis arent going to be tomorrow casting, any more information about that?
|
Anyone else noticed the observer for the last days used to switch to production and stuff while still battles are going on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
