EPT[Code S] RO32 Group B 2013 GSL Season 1 - Page 27
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
tns
1054 Posts
| ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4560 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:15 Azurues wrote: leenock outplayed baby Yea, coming back from such a deficit really showed the difference in skill levels. Come back when you're a toddler. | ||
|
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:15 gedatsu wrote: I'm not generally one to correct someone on language, for example I wouldn't point out the mistake you just made (pronunciation) if we were talking about anything else. Because I agree with you, the point of language is to get your point across. But if someone makes the same mistake over and over for years then yes, I think it's time to care. I think you would get annoyed if they pronounced it "hatcherai" or "hivvey". Lair and Layer sound very similar though. Hatcherei sounds Japanese, and hivvey sounds like... HIV :S Also... de ja vu :| | ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:15 nomyx wrote: 12 medivacs = 1200/1200 fungal growth = 75 energy killing the terran with terrans: priceless Corrected that for you. | ||
|
Zerg.Zilla
Hungary5029 Posts
| ||
|
nomyx
United States2205 Posts
imbaimbaimbaimbaimba that one, I forgot who it was. Ryung? Bomber? not sure | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
Leenock: 81.93% Curious: 45.07% MC: 42.38% BaBy: 30.61% details, data source, code Detailed placement probabilities | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
| ||
|
Roboturner
United States11 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:16 Thinasy wrote: Nah he outplayed himself by getting supply blocked way too many times and not dealing with the infested terrans correctly. From watching SPL and also these games it seems Baby has a macro problem when it comes to dropping supply, almost as bad as puma. | ||
|
chambertin
United States1704 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:12 Hiea wrote: I like how zerglings are still the support unit and infestors are the core  At least the first game was exciting and not entirely tear inducing... | ||
|
Lunchador
United States776 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:16 Laryleprakon wrote: Fun series, Leenock showing his class. Baby's macro didn't seem that good. Baby was very on point in game 1. Maybe losing that in a fashion like that could've affected him greatly. I most certainly wouldn't be a calm and happy camper after that myself. | ||
|
Umpteen
United Kingdom1570 Posts
| ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
Save us MC! | ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:15 Salteador Neo wrote: I really wanna know if Baby thinks this is balanced. There was that other terran guy who clearly didn't. You mean being outplayed? Yeah being outplayed is kinda imbalanced, the better player tends to win a lot of the time (up to 100%!!!) if he plays better. Should fix that | ||
|
Zeon0
Austria2995 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:17 nomyx wrote: imbaimbaimbaimbaimba that one, I forgot who it was. Ryung? Bomber? not sure You're thinking of Ryung | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:17 Dodgin wrote: From watching SPL and also these games it seems Baby has a macro problem when it comes to dropping supply, almost as bad as puma. Tbh I haven't seen that much clean macro from kespa terran (See fantasy). | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:16 Thinasy wrote: Nah he outplayed himself by getting supply blocked way too many times and not dealing with the infested terrans correctly. The thing is he always uses supply drop. So either he has worse mechanics than a platinum player or he for some reason prefers to use energy for supply instead of mules. | ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:17 nomyx wrote: imbaimbaimbaimbaimba that one, I forgot who it was. Ryung? Bomber? not sure Ryung did that. | ||
| ||
