EPTCode S > Yoda >>>> Nerchio
[IEM] Katowice Day 2 - Page 87
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
usethis2
2164 Posts
Code S > Yoda >>>> Nerchio | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10166 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:47 Big J wrote: What does Yodas low ressources have to do with nerchios bad opening? What does Nerchio's opening have to do on how well Yoda's macro is ? It only has to do with his own macro. On January 19 2013 03:50 usethis2 wrote: From what I've seen today, Code S > Yoda >>>> Nerchio Yoda is code S. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:48 TheDwf wrote: No idea why YoDa felt he needed to commit so much after killing 4 Sentries for free. He figured since he just killed 4 sentries and a WP for essentially free (3 workers and some mining), Socke's army would be much much weaker from losing such a big investment, and Yoda tried to seize the win. He reached too far and too aggressively, and he stumbled. | ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:50 usethis2 wrote: From what I've seen today, Code S > Yoda >>>> Nerchio ? if nerchio builds an ultralisk cavern instead of 3 infestation pits, he acutally crushes yoda iwth 8 ultras - he had 1.5k 1.2k but only build 16 lings instead. dno what ur talking about hoenstly | ||
|
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
| ||
|
ibraishome
Germany337 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:49 TRpredator wrote: Can anyone be so kind and explain me why Grubby advanced over Moonglade in Group A? Grubby had 3-2 overall score and Moonglade had the same score 3-2, thus it leads to comparison between map scores. Grubby has 7-6 and Moonglade has 6-5,however it doesn t make sense since 7-6 isn t better than 6-5. So why Grubby advanced over Moonglade? I used Liquidpedia so there might be a mistake in map scores there however if info there is true than it doesn t make sense. I think they count the maps overall won by a player, disregarding the losses. So Moonglade has 6 and Grubby 7 -> Grubby advances. Weird though, because Moonglade even won directly against Grubby. | ||
|
WerderBremen
Germany1070 Posts
| ||
|
Benjamin99
4176 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
| ||
|
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:49 TRpredator wrote: Can anyone be so kind and explain me why Grubby advanced over Moonglade in Group A? Grubby had 3-2 overall score and Moonglade had the same score 3-2, thus it leads to comparison between map scores. Grubby has 7-6 and Moonglade has 6-5,however it doesn t make sense since 7-6 isn t better than 6-5. So why Grubby advanced over Moonglade? I used Liquidpedia so there might be a mistake in map scores there however if info there is true than it doesn t make sense. Both have a +1 map score (just like every other sport, they go by +/-, not percentage won). Most tournaments would check head to head after that, but IEM seems to go by maps won as the third tiebreaker (similar to football often using goals scored as a third tiebreaker). | ||
|
ibraishome
Germany337 Posts
On January 19 2013 03:51 L3g3nd_ wrote: who is casting with tod? hes really good Kaelaris | ||
|
stardog
556 Posts
| ||
|
usethis2
2164 Posts
| ||
|
iSunrise
3302 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9331 Posts
| ||
|
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
| ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
| ||
| ||
