EPT
It would be incredibly funny if miraculously both BW hero's will become decent.
[WCS KR] LR1 D1 - Page 97
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
It would be incredibly funny if miraculously both BW hero's will become decent. | ||
|
Tyree
1508 Posts
| ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:50 bgx wrote: It would be incredibly funny if miracously both BW hero's will become decent. lol that would be funny | ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:50 Minidex wrote: Where is all the viewers, in top right corner of Tl coming from :o? maybe it's a bug? | ||
|
8mmspikes
United States1704 Posts
herO[jOin] is actually the youngest hero, before HerO was liquid he was known as Hero[shield] in his Brood War days | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:50 bgx wrote: It would be incredibly funny if miracously both BW hero's will become decent. We're gonna have to call them HerO1, HerO2 and HerO3 :p | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
Nah, it's counting all the streams on twitch.tv iirc. That is including IPL's LoL channel. | ||
|
teamamerica
United States958 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:51 Tyree wrote: When the 2 Hero's meet eventually, they should play for the name "Hero" the loser is forced with the name Villain for the rest of SC2 EG should recruit herO and have him change his name to anti-herO imo. | ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:52 Fragile51 wrote: We're gonna have to call them HerO1, HerO2 and HerO3 :p would we name the numbers after entrance into sc2 or entrance into progaming? that would be a hard question lol especially if each of them wanted to be number one lol | ||
|
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:42 Squeegy wrote: If I were to listen to you, it would never be there. Everytime a player is slumping or playing below his standards. If that is the case, then I think the more reasonable explanation is that you're rating the GSL palyers based on their best. Not on their average. Kespa are already competetive with GSL, I think that is quite established. Yeah I saw this argument coming...come on man, DRG is slumping. He was the fucking final boss of the GSTL, he carried his team to the finals pretty much single handedly. For quite a while he was the undisputed best zerg in the world. This is clearly no longer the case. He is worse now, on average/at his best, whatever, than he was 6 months ago. No one is arguing that Kespa is not competitive with GSL, like I said it's what we all expect. Earlier on you posted that 'first it was Kespa players can't beat GSL players, then they can't beat Code S players, now it's MVP and Oz...soon MVP and Oz will lose as well.' No shit dude. You appear to be having an argument with imaginary people that think that Kespa players will never reach the level of GSL Code S stalwarts; no one thinks that. No one. It's almost self evident, in fact. However what we do disagree with is the idea that Kespa players are going to dominate completely. There's really nothing except fanboyism to indicate that they will. I should hope that we are all happy that Kespa players are beginning (key word beginning) to be competitive with GSL players. But when people jump into LR threads shouting about that fucking elephant then yeah, people get a little defensive. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16848 Posts
 | ||
|
Darkthorn
Romania912 Posts
I can't belive they actually forfeited...WCS is really important... | ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:51 Tyree wrote: When the 2 Hero's meet eventually, they should play for the name "Hero" the loser is forced with the name Villain for the rest of SC2 That would be pretty epic ! Though I don't think fan would agree :D But seriously, each time they end up facing each other then, they fight for the title ! That would be an awesome rivalry, I think we lack these in SC2 currently (NO I WON'T TALK ABOUT KESPA - GOM). | ||
|
8mmspikes
United States1704 Posts
| ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:52 Fragile51 wrote: Nah, it's counting all the streams on twitch.tv iirc. That is including IPL's LoL channel. ah. that might be it. I purged LoL from my TL so I didnt see those streams. Makes sense. | ||
|
Figgy
Canada1788 Posts
| ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:53 Shock710 wrote: would we name the numbers after entrance into sc2 or entrance into progaming? that would be a hard question lol especially if each of them wanted to be number one lol Depending on ELO ranking, also it will remind them how good or bad they are seeing their own nicks. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:53 Shock710 wrote: would we name the numbers after entrance into sc2 or entrance into progaming? that would be a hard question lol especially if each of them wanted to be number one lol You're overthinking it, just let them play a FFA and make it depend on that :p | ||
|
Squeegy
Finland1166 Posts
On August 14 2012 20:48 Assirra wrote: I don't think that many people are denying that some kespa players can indeed play on GSL lvl. However isn't it normal that people want their favorite players to be on their best and when they play lower and get defeated they say it? DRG for instance has been mentally down ever since GSL/GSTL semi finals. SC has been in the hospital for quite some time. Does that mean that the kespa players didn't outplayed them? ofc they did. And i would love if some of them qualified for the next GSL. New players in a competition is always good. Oh and just a tip, don't seriously mention that article if you want to be taken serious. It was a bunch of nonsense that was written way to early on the basis that sc2 wouldn't evolve at all. Because they are excuses. Has been mentally down? What does that really mean. How much worse is he playing? I can guarantee you that game three he played great. Effort was just better. Moreover, the validity of the claims of them playing below their standard are, well, questionable when it according to some happens every single time they lose. Note: I am not saying every time Kespa player has won, it has been the GSL player playing their best. Who are you to tell me not to mention it? That article was essentially the opinion of any BW player at the time. Including mine. And it still is. And it makes sense. People just keep misunderstanding it and building strawmen. | ||
| ||
