EPTUp to that point he was. Roro had a huge lead from early game, Leenock outplayed him all midgame. Late game I missed a bunch because my internet sucks, but I guess Leenock had too many harvesters, IDK.
[WCS KR] WR2 D1 - Page 48
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
Up to that point he was. Roro had a huge lead from early game, Leenock outplayed him all midgame. Late game I missed a bunch because my internet sucks, but I guess Leenock had too many harvesters, IDK. | ||
|
IPS.Mardow.
Germany713 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:17 FuzzyJAM wrote: Leenock is constantly outplaying Roro about seventeen times over. It's ridiculous. Did we watch the same game? | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
leenock trying to out multitask roro was indeed ridiculous, he is the 5 control group zerg after all. | ||
|
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
| ||
|
Squeegy
Finland1166 Posts
| ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
| ||
|
Severedevil
United States4830 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:22 GreyKnight wrote: weird game, i actually think both players kept splitting their armies too much. Seems like keeping a single Infestor with your little Roach skirmish groups would make them vastly more effective. | ||
|
babysimba
10466 Posts
| ||
|
calvinL
Canada416 Posts
You don't need a high drone count in ZvZ so Roro wasn't that behind at all. Also roach/hydra > roach | ||
|
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
| ||
imallinson
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:22 DrakeFZX3 wrote: Leenock was too deep in a hole to overcome Roro. Interesting game. Leenock was ahead for the second half of that game. He had more drones, more army but Roro had the better army for a basetrade. | ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
| ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:23 IshinShishi wrote: leenock trying to out multitask roro was indeed ridiculous, he is the 5 control group zerg after all. in fact he killed a lot of infestor. Only thing that won Roro that game was basetrade decision... | ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8332 Posts
indeed when KeSPA players survive the early shenanigans, they do stood a chance | ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:23 Squeegy wrote: So, one of the absolute best zergs GSL has to offer just lost to Roro with a few months of practise. That elephant in the room. Quit overexaggerating. Losing one game isn't the end of the world for Leenock nor is it some impending elephant stampede. | ||
|
Severedevil
United States4830 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:23 babysimba wrote: The casters are casting the game wrong -_- They talked like leenock's way ahead just because he had higher drone count and bank. Roro was like 14 hydras ahead with similar infestor and army count. Mineral bank is not that relevant in zvz. Mineral bank could've counted for a lot more if he'd produced Zerglings to bolster his raids (if larva is an issue, he can add hatches), and spines to fortify his bases. Clearly, sitting on minerals isn't going to win you the game. | ||
|
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:23 calvinL wrote: Didn't think Khaldor was right at all. You don't need a high drone count in ZvZ so Roro wasn't that behind at all. Also roach/hydra > roach I think it was Nestea who said that around 65 drones is optimal for zvz. You dont need more | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Squeegy
Finland1166 Posts
On August 10 2012 21:25 DrakeFZX3 wrote: Quit overexaggerating. Losing one game isn't the end of the world for Leenock nor is it some impending elephant stampede. Do you think Leenock could do that to Roro if Roro had played the game for two years and Leenock for a few months? The stampede is coming. | ||
| ||
