EPT[Code A] Ro48 2012 GSL Season 2 - Page 97
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
rothsbury
Australia1654 Posts
| ||
|
boxturtle
United States224 Posts
At least when he re-qualifies for code A, everyone will know he's ready. Too bad naniwa got the seed even though HuK performed better in foreign events. | ||
|
masakenji
Australia415 Posts
| ||
|
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
Poll: Did you enjoy the Khaltosis casting duo? Yes (263) No (6) 269 total votes Your vote: Did you enjoy the Khaltosis casting duo? | ||
|
shineq
United Kingdom1453 Posts
| ||
|
Laurens
Belgium4558 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:33 tomatriedes wrote: Run up your ramp and lose your nat and it's game over anyway. 1 base terran >>> 1 base protoss in economy. first of all, the protoss has more probes mining since terran pulled half his scvs, 1 mule does not make up for that, protoss econ is definitely better for a good time. second, the protoss is ridiculously far ahead in tech. Hack stopped mining gas, if Huk rushes out 2 colossi he can amove across and win, since he'll have tons of sentries with FFs anyway from holding his ramp going up the ramp is definitely the right option, but because he had so many buildings at his natural he couldn't. | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:35 LuckyFool wrote: I feel bad for huk. Losing like that sucks. I'm a big startale hack antifan now. I, on the other hand, love a guy with a true kill instinct. | ||
|
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:37 boxturtle wrote: That's....quite possibly the most disappointing way to get kicked out of GSL. At least when he re-qualifies for code A, everyone will know he's ready. Too bad naniwa got the seed even though HuK performed better in foreign events. Requalifies? I fully expect GSL to give him a seed for next season again! | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Malinor
Germany4758 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:37 FidoDido wrote: He actually did, Slasher mentioned it on his twitter account the other day when Naniwa went 2-0 in his group. Seems a bit out of place, really. Anyway, I said it before, but I think Artosis and Khaldor worked REALLY well together. I am looking forward to maybe see them cast together again sometimes. | ||
|
ChriseC
Germany440 Posts
why u lose huk | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:38 Dodgin wrote: Well it has to be asked.. Poll: Did you enjoy the Khaltosis casting duo? Yes (263) No (6) 269 total votes Your vote: Did you enjoy the Khaltosis casting duo? Should've been a comparison to Tastosis instead. This beat the usual combo out of the water, especially since they actually talked about Starcraft. | ||
|
Vadrigar
Bulgaria2379 Posts
Chris Loranger @LorangerChris @QuanticNaNi shouldnt talk so much shit over twitter about my play especially when u emo so hard when i criticize ur unworthy code s seed | ||
|
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
Expected if he got 80% winrate against Squirtle and practice with Parting some of the best PvT. | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:38 ragnorr wrote: Requalifies? I fully expect GSL to give him a seed for next season again! Yeah, life is pretty unfair. | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:38 ChriseC wrote: huk top3 control why u lose huk Hack was top 2 ?  | ||
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
| ||
|
Seiniyta
Belgium1815 Posts
On his twitter account to Naniwa: @QuanticNaNi shouldnt talk so much shit over twitter about my play especially when u emo so hard when i criticize ur unworthy code s seed Edit: bleh, soemone beat me to it | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On April 17 2012 20:34 Grovbolle wrote: People like you kind of piss me off, what would you rather: Be "good" in your definition, or have good results? I am not saying aLive is the best T in the world, but he has good results. I do know what the difference is, like yellow in BW, he was fucking good, but never won a gold. But which is actually better? Why do you think the discussion is about what I rather want? This discussion is about being good, not about results, as results vary a lot in the short term. LEsser skilled players can often times get better results in a few tournaments even if they are 10% worse than other players. However long termish we can expect the best players to get best results. But of course if you dont play the game at a decent level your self, you can't really determine who is good/really good/mediocore, and your best bet is too look at results. | ||
| ||
