EPT[GSL] 2012 Season 2 Up/Down Matches Day 2 - Page 33
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
KristofferAG
Norway25712 Posts
| ||
|
Bwaaaa
Australia969 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:13 pdd wrote: Ace was sitting on 1.2k gas for so long. Why didn't he get Templar? Now people are gonna whine about Mutas. Even archons would have been great vs that comp. | ||
|
ViperPL
Poland1775 Posts
 | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
 was best holiday i have EVER had! so so awesome | ||
|
red4ce
United States7313 Posts
| ||
|
Bashion
Cook Islands2612 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:07 looken wrote: thats not the point notsosmartass. my point was that the commentator was QQing half of the game about how imba this map is against toss and that inca had basically already lost just because he has to play on this sooooo very imbalanced map. but obviously its not THAT bad, you just have to do something a little more creativ than FFE into multigatepush or deadball... think first, flame later. Just because Inca won, it doesnt make that map more balanced. Thats the reason why GSL is getting rid of it next season. | ||
|
Smurphy
United States374 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:12 gideel wrote: leenocktopus showing exactly the difference between a code S level player and a code b/a level player I strongly agree with your thoughts. Ace simply did not have the multitasking and macro to compete with Leenock in that match. Ace was frequently supply blocked and floating 1000/1000. Ace couldn't keep up with replacing Gateways, Pylons and warping in new units while microing his units. I must admit that Leenock kept the pressure on with Muta banes and there was tons of micro and decisions to do. I find it incredibly difficult and I find it incomprehensible that humans are capable of actually doing everything required to defend that. Yet, Code S players somehow find a way to keep up with all of those things. Ace is not on par with some others. | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:14 KristofferAG wrote: That was way too hectic to LR. <3 | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:14 Bwaaaa wrote: Even archons would have been great vs that comp. I think he could had held all that if he just had 4-5 templars at each and every base, maybe one at the chokes at well. But maybe he got nervous or something? He used most of his gas for sentries for the needed forcefields, they also got mutalisk sniped all the time. | ||
|
Angelbelow
United States3728 Posts
| ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:12 gideel wrote: leenocktopus showing exactly the difference between a code S level player and a code b/a level player Ace's micro was really good so definitely not B level on this game imo. | ||
|
Bashion
Cook Islands2612 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:14 Bwaaaa wrote: Even archons would have been great vs that comp. I think he had enough gas for like 10 archons. They would ve raped that comp easily. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
He needs to learn how to roach vP and lingfestor vs T, right now he's pretty easy to prepare for | ||
|
Ncutable
Romania99 Posts
| ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:16 samurai80 wrote: Ace's micro was really good so definitely not B level on this game imo. I just dont think that strat actually works well vs muta aggression on the maps he got. | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
At least those are my 2 cents. | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:17 Ncutable wrote: I´m not sure if Leenock is Code S yet. IF Sniper and Inca both go 3-1 then wouldn´t there be a 3-way-tie where all three took a game off each other? Yep, it's a possibility. But he's guaranteed a tie-breaker, at least. For Leenock/Sniper to go 3-1, Sniper would have to beat Leenock. Meaning that Sniper > Leenock > InCa > Sniper (if InCa gets 3-1 too) | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:16 Angelbelow wrote: Storm or Archons would serve well against Leenocks build. Wonder why he didn't get a few HT's during the aggression. Was probably worried about HT being sniped by mutas whilst he was multi-tasking defence. Archons though I agree, he should have tried to make a couple earlier. | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:17 Ncutable wrote: I´m not sure if Leenock is Code S yet. IF Sniper and Inca both go 3-1 then wouldn´t there be a 3-way-tie where all three took a game off each other? Yes. Haven't looked at the numbers, but each have the same win/loss record and beat one another, for example Sniper>Inca>Leenock>Sniper, it would be a tie. | ||
|
Niiza
United Kingdom60 Posts
On March 13 2012 20:17 Ncutable wrote: I´m not sure if Leenock is Code S yet. IF Sniper and Inca both go 3-1 then wouldn´t there be a 3-way-tie where all three took a game off each other? You're right but that requires all 4 games left to go against Leenock, long odds. | ||
| ||
