EPT[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D8 - Page 74
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
weiliem
2050 Posts
| ||
|
beute
Germany197 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:24 nofacej wrote: I really hate that force fields completely invalidate bunkers like that. and having no forcefields completely invalidates attacking attacking at that position. Like it or not, a static defense building that can out-repair a protoss/zerg early game army must be destroyable in some way. | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36919 Posts
| ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
| ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:24 MorroW wrote: this matchup is so disappointing half of the games end in build order stuff and other half is players making big blunders or playing badly. rarely im impressed by players in this matchup Well it really seems that way. Usually when I win it's the result of what my opponent failed to do. Very unsatisfying. | ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
sonkaliniz
United States178 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:27 avilo wrote: That's because that's sadly how this match-up is a lot of times. TvP/PvT is a guessing game/gambling game because Protoss can choose from a variety of all-ins that straight up kill Terran, and so Terran can choose to do the only thing that can stop all protoss all-ins, which is 111, and then of course that is strong in itself and can kill protoss too...so then they're sometimes forced to 1 base as well to stop that (or blind 15 nexus/1gate expo). The match-up is pretty broken for both sides imo, but Protoss has way more viable all-ins right now + a more viable long macro game...so yeah...@_@ I think TvP though really is build order luck or "poker reads" way too much  I'm wondering what your oppinion would be if you played protoss all these years instead of terran | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36919 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
rpgalon
Brazil1069 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:30 Fionn wrote: This could be the first time ever where Protoss isn't last in racial distribution in the Ro16 in GSL history. are we going to see the first non MC protoss GSL champion??? OMG | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:23 Fionn wrote: It's a Protoss. I will not share whom because then he'll lose in the Ro16. Interesting twist. Is the curse only active if Fionn openly predicts it, or does it cross into his thoughts too? | ||
|
Wockets
Hong Kong467 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:30 Fionn wrote: This could be the first time ever where Protoss isn't last in racial distribution in the Ro16 in GSL history. Surely you're crazy. Hasn't Zerg been last most of thet time, especially during the MC era? It was only during the 30/32 terran times when Protoss became least represented right? ...too lazy to liquipedia haha | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On January 19 2012 21:30 Fionn wrote: This could be the first time ever where Protoss isn't last in racial distribution in the Ro16 in GSL history. I hope the day never comes where a race will break Toss's record for least players in Ro16, though. Would make for a boring, variety-less Ro16.  | ||
|
ckast
175 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
|
FryktSkyene
United States1327 Posts
| ||
| ||
