|
Please try not to bash players, casters, countries, races, users, balance, apple pie, etc. in the Live Report threads. These threads are not meant for bashing. |
On January 20 2012 00:12 Seekzor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:07 Lysanias wrote:On January 20 2012 00:02 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:00 Lysanias wrote:On January 19 2012 23:55 Seekzor wrote:On January 19 2012 23:49 NeWeNiyaLord wrote:On January 19 2012 23:45 Kagge wrote:On January 19 2012 23:44 gullberg wrote:On January 19 2012 23:43 Kagge wrote:lol, after the some time IEM accepts their PCs are shit and ppl that just said everything was Naniwas fault disappeared  GG So you're saying that it's completely reasonable to forfeit a tournament over a laggy game? Thats what Im saying. Then your smallminded and how no idea what proffesionalism is. Aslong as the game is playable (Which it is even with lag) and players have the same circumstances (which they did). The players should play the game on even footing for the sponsor/fans/teams. Dont even understand why you are discussing this. Sweden fanboy? (: The game wasn't playable, did you see that last fight in Strelok vs Whitera? sure the game was over anyways but that kind of lag is not playable You were there ? i find it hard to judge by watching from stream on how bad the lag actualy is. You blindly trust one player while not the others who did not complain on screen. Rather premature conclusion tbh. Dude, Strelok was timing out during the fight literally every second until the battle was over. If that doesn't clearly show that there are technical issues i dunno what to tell you. I did not say there where no technical difficulties "dude" there are, you picked the worst moment yes it lagged bad, yet during the rest of the game how bad was it ? So far we only have Naniwa's drama, at how bad it all is. Yet others have not complained, how would we know how bad it is when we have a lose cannon to follow only. You take up Naniwa and follow him blindly i rather stay in the middle. Well consider the fact that IEM delayed all the matches for yet another hour I think it's safe to say that the game was unplayable, and not just Naniwa complaining
Fair enough, no doubt it's not a good condition to play. I'd would not mind an official statement of them though. ( on what's actualy going on) And then judge accordingly.
|
On January 20 2012 00:17 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:12 Seekzor wrote:On January 20 2012 00:07 Lysanias wrote:On January 20 2012 00:02 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:00 Lysanias wrote:On January 19 2012 23:55 Seekzor wrote:On January 19 2012 23:49 NeWeNiyaLord wrote:On January 19 2012 23:45 Kagge wrote:On January 19 2012 23:44 gullberg wrote:On January 19 2012 23:43 Kagge wrote:lol, after the some time IEM accepts their PCs are shit and ppl that just said everything was Naniwas fault disappeared  GG So you're saying that it's completely reasonable to forfeit a tournament over a laggy game? Thats what Im saying. Then your smallminded and how no idea what proffesionalism is. Aslong as the game is playable (Which it is even with lag) and players have the same circumstances (which they did). The players should play the game on even footing for the sponsor/fans/teams. Dont even understand why you are discussing this. Sweden fanboy? (: The game wasn't playable, did you see that last fight in Strelok vs Whitera? sure the game was over anyways but that kind of lag is not playable You were there ? i find it hard to judge by watching from stream on how bad the lag actualy is. You blindly trust one player while not the others who did not complain on screen. Rather premature conclusion tbh. Dude, Strelok was timing out during the fight literally every second until the battle was over. If that doesn't clearly show that there are technical issues i dunno what to tell you. I did not say there where no technical difficulties "dude" there are, you picked the worst moment yes it lagged bad, yet during the rest of the game how bad was it ? So far we only have Naniwa's drama, at how bad it all is. Yet others have not complained, how would we know how bad it is when we have a lose cannon to follow only. You take up Naniwa and follow him blindly i rather stay in the middle. Well consider the fact that IEM delayed all the matches for yet another hour I think it's safe to say that the game was unplayable, and not just Naniwa complaining Fair enough, no doubt it's not a good condition to play. I would not mind an official statement of them though. ( on what's actualy going on) And then judge accordingly. This times a thousand. Seems Esports has still a long way of how they communicate things it seems.
|
On January 20 2012 00:07 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:02 Fragile51 wrote:
Dude, Strelok was timing out during the fight literally every second until the battle was over. If that doesn't clearly show that there are technical issues i dunno what to tell you. I did not say there where no technical difficulties "dude" there are, you picked the worst moment yes it lagged bad, yet during the rest of the game how bad was it ? So far we only have Naniwa's drama, at how bad it all is. Yet others have not complained, how would we know how bad it is when we have a lose cannon to follow only. You take up Naniwa and follow him blindly i rather stay in the middle.
Man, that was not "bad lag" that was absolutely unplayable. What happens if later in the tournament we have an even game with 200/200 armies fighting in the middle of the map and one of the players not being able to control his units?
Do we need Naniwa or others to tell us that this is completely unacceptable for a major event featuring GSL, IPL, MLG GI winners? Shouldn't we declare that they either get their stuff together or pack it up and never organize an event again until they are capable of doing it?
Keeping a note about LAN of course, it could be Blizzard's fault. It is not the players' fault though in any case.
|
no no no.. oh yeah yeah :D
|
Just turned on the stream and wow, soon TLO is going to leave Liquid to join ZZ Top
|
Comedy 2v2s are always worth watching.
|
lol in my opinion homestory cup should expand to TLO´s house because those 2 alone are really fun to watch^^
|
Canada13389 Posts
I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm?
|
On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm?
Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know.
|
This takes so awfully long... :C ESL what are you doing...
|
On January 20 2012 00:31 Fragile51 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm? Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know. Doubt it's bad internet. All other games are running just fine. And that's usually the case... only SC2 is often lagging behind T_T
Might be too bad computers, but could also be b.net 2.0.
|
On January 20 2012 00:32 HolydaKing wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:31 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm? Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know. Doubt it's bad internet. All other games are running just fine. And that's usually the case... only SC2 is often lagging behind T_T Might be too bad computers, but could also be b.net 2.0. The other games probably don't need internet though..
|
Canada13389 Posts
LoL is back underway so SC2 should be up soon
nvm they were rebroadcasting >.< just actually read past seeing something moving on screen lol
|
On January 20 2012 00:35 KingPaddy wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:32 HolydaKing wrote:On January 20 2012 00:31 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm? Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know. Doubt it's bad internet. All other games are running just fine. And that's usually the case... only SC2 is often lagging behind T_T Might be too bad computers, but could also be b.net 2.0. The other games probably don't need internet though..  LoL does not? That might be it then. ^^
|
Name of current song???? :D
|
On January 20 2012 00:37 HolydaKing wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:35 KingPaddy wrote:On January 20 2012 00:32 HolydaKing wrote:On January 20 2012 00:31 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm? Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know. Doubt it's bad internet. All other games are running just fine. And that's usually the case... only SC2 is often lagging behind T_T Might be too bad computers, but could also be b.net 2.0. The other games probably don't need internet though..  LoL does not? That might be it then. ^^ LoL requires an internet connection.
|
On January 20 2012 00:38 Elem wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 00:37 HolydaKing wrote:On January 20 2012 00:35 KingPaddy wrote:On January 20 2012 00:32 HolydaKing wrote:On January 20 2012 00:31 Fragile51 wrote:On January 20 2012 00:29 ZeromuS wrote: I just tuned in venue related issues preventing games atm? Technical difficulties, bad internet problems and also computer problems as far as we know. Doubt it's bad internet. All other games are running just fine. And that's usually the case... only SC2 is often lagging behind T_T Might be too bad computers, but could also be b.net 2.0. The other games probably don't need internet though..  LoL does not? That might be it then. ^^ LoL requires an internet connection. Ah okay, sorry then
|
On January 20 2012 00:38 NeWeNiyaLord wrote: Name of current song???? :D
Yeah this is really really nice. Someone enlighten?
|
On January 20 2012 00:40 Synwave wrote:Yeah this is really really nice. Someone enlighten? On TLO/Apollo? 2cellos (I think) - Resistance.
|
On January 20 2012 00:38 NeWeNiyaLord wrote: Name of current song???? :D muse resistance covered by 2cellos
|
|
|
|