EPTOn January 12 2012 21:50 Noocta wrote:
Can't believe Bomber didn't go throught.
I think 99% of us put him to pass on Liquibet. :-(
Can't believe Bomber didn't go throught.
I think 99% of us put him to pass on Liquibet. :-(
I did
And Oz rofl 
[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D4 - Page 90
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45175 Posts
I did And Oz rofl | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
I had to go, I'm back now for a bit., Man that game was ugly. Please don't continue this, I've got places to be. Also, I liquibet bomber, but I'm super happy that Oz and Curious got though, they totally deserved it. I feel like bomber should have got 3rd above Inca, the fact that inca was even close is teerrible. | ||
|
Leifish
851 Posts
| ||
|
pi_rate_pir_ate
United States179 Posts
| ||
|
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
I'm sad Bomber didn't make it, but Oz and Curious definitely deserve it. Good job by both of them. How many games did InCa make DTs? | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On January 12 2012 22:54 VirgilSC2 wrote: I went through the results one by one....and the fact that InCa almost got through really scared me. I'm sad Bomber didn't make it, but Oz and Curious definitely deserve it. Good job by both of them. How many games did InCa make DTs? I think Oz used dt's more. | ||
|
Philipd122
Australia776 Posts
I went for Oz-Curious, Oz to beat Curious but sadly thought Bomber would at least beat InCa. | ||
|
devPLEASE
Kenya605 Posts
| ||
|
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On January 12 2012 22:59 devPLEASE wrote: I can't believe people would even think that Curious could beat Oz. Curious is pretty good, but Oz is ten times better. Bomber is in a slump, and Inca is… well Inca. Got gonna lie though, Inca has improved. Sometimes it looked as though he could've won. Look at Curious's recent ZVP and you might see why Oz was the underdog. | ||
|
Funkydonky
950 Posts
On January 12 2012 22:59 devPLEASE wrote: I can't believe people would even think that Curious could beat Oz. Curious is pretty good, but Oz is ten times better. Bomber is in a slump, and Inca is… well Inca. Got gonna lie though, Inca has improved. Sometimes it looked as though he could've won. maybe because curios beat oz 4-0 in code a finals ? in my liquibet i predicted that oz and curios will go through, but didnt think inca will beat bomber | ||
|
bbm
United Kingdom1320 Posts
Unlike (hopefully) everyone who voted on the polls, I'm someone who has uses these polls, I'm a working man and I don't have much free time so I don't want to see games full of sloppy or boring play... renaming the yes to "OMGFGFGFG YES YES YES" is one thing that I've been vocal enough about in the past anyway, but adding a fourth completely unexplained option? I really don't like this :| | ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On January 12 2012 23:05 bbm wrote: So seeker, without any prior knowledge of the game, should I watch oz vs inca game 2, or inca vs bomber game 1 or 2? :| If everyone who voted "What... did i watch?" or whatever voted no, that'd completely change the outcome of the polls. If they all voted yes that makes the game significantly better and an instant watch. Unlike (hopefully) everyone who voted on the polls, I'm someone who has uses these polls, I'm a working man and I don't have much free time so I don't want to see games full of sloppy or boring play... renaming the yes to "OMGFGFGFG YES YES YES" is one thing that I've been vocal enough about in the past anyway, but adding a fourth completely unexplained option? I really don't like this :| It seems common sense enouggh to assume it means the game reached terrible levels not seen since TheBest was pounding nerds. | ||
|
devPLEASE
Kenya605 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:29 Rhedsa wrote: oh my... so many upsets today. but wp by InCa! who would have thought?! Inca beating Bomber may be an upset, but Bomber is in a slump losing to a lot of people. As for Oz vs. Curious, that Code A win didn't mean much. Remember when Bomber beat Mvp in a Code A final? Yeah, look at Bomber now. Oz just simply didn't care back then. It's Code S, plus Leenock has improved, so better practice with better partners now. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45175 Posts
On January 12 2012 22:59 devPLEASE wrote: I can't believe people would even think that Curious could beat Oz. Curious is pretty good, but Oz is ten times better. Bomber is in a slump, and Inca is… well Inca. Got gonna lie though, Inca has improved. Sometimes it looked as though he could've won. Because it's been proven in the past that Curious can beat Oz... because Curious has beaten Oz o.O | ||
|
devPLEASE
Kenya605 Posts
On January 12 2012 23:27 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Because it's been proven in the past that Curious can beat Oz... because Curious has beaten Oz o.O Anyone can beat anyone in SC2. Remember NaDa vs. Inca? Or when Bomber lost to Byun in the Ro8. And those were Code S. Oz more or less secured his Code S spot so that finals didn't mean much. Or maybe it was just a bad day for Oz. who knows. But today, for Oz vs. Curious the better player won. Don't say Curious had a bad day either because he didn't. If he had a bad day, he would've been in Bomber's 4th place spot. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45175 Posts
On January 12 2012 23:34 devPLEASE wrote: Anyone can beat anyone in SC2. Remember NaDa vs. Inca? Or when Bomber lost to Byun in the Ro8. And those were Code S. Oz more or less secured his Code S spot so that finals didn't mean much. Or maybe it was just a bad day for Oz. who knows. But today, for Oz vs. Curious the better player won. Don't say Curious had a bad day either because he didn't. If he had a bad day, he would've been in Bomber's 4th place spot. Please stop dodging the fact that your claim is over the top. People had plenty of jusitification to bet that Curious would beat Oz again, because Curious crushed Oz in a long BoX series when they played not too long ago. The only person making excuses here is you. "I can't believe people would even think that Curious could beat Oz." -> "Anyone can beat anyone in SC2." Okay thanks for that. Contradicting yourself is one way of going about an argument. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On January 12 2012 22:18 KanoCoke wrote: Sen/BoxeR ForGG idrA Bomber I hate this tournament. lol yeah.. the first days of GSL have been sad when you think about it. :d | ||
|
devPLEASE
Kenya605 Posts
On January 12 2012 23:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Please stop dodging the fact that your claim is over the top. People had plenty of jusitification to bet that Curious would beat Oz again, because Curious crushed Oz in a long BoX series when they played not too long ago. The only person making excuses here is you. "I can't believe people would even think that Curious could beat Oz." -> "Anyone can beat anyone in SC2." Okay thanks for that. Contradicting yourself is one way of going about an argument. You're clearly confused. Curious beat Oz because Oz didn't care. Do you vote against Mvp whenever he plays Bomber just because Bomber beat him in Code A? Just because they caught their opponent off guard or whatever in the past doesn't mean they're a better player. Am I saying Curious blows? No. I'm saying Oz is a better player. That was Code A, something players use to get to Code S. He got to the point where he can easily get in Code S, do he didn't care about the finals. Same as Bomber vs. Mvp | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45175 Posts
On January 12 2012 23:52 devPLEASE wrote: You're clearly confused. Curious beat Oz because Oz didn't care. Do you vote against Mvp whenever he plays Bomber just because Bomber beat him in Code A? Just because they caught their opponent off guard or whatever in the past doesn't mean they're a better player. Am I saying Curious blows? No. I'm saying Oz is a better player. That was Code A, something players use to get to Code S. He got to the point where he can easily get in Code S, do he didn't care about the finals. Same as Bomber vs. Mvp I wasn't sure if you were serious or joking until now, but you gave yourself away with that one. I don't attempt to have intellectual conversations with people who are trolling, sorry. Enjoy the rest of your day. | ||
| ||
