|
Can't go to lunch without coming back to 20+ reports. This makes me upset. Stop the bullshit or get ready to hammered. Thanks --Pholon |
On December 13 2011 20:56 Yaki wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:54 gregnog wrote:
Definitely getting old watching all in after all in. Guess that is what happens in this format though. This is naniwa's fault he just plays WAY too greedy and always relies on the fact that his opponent does not attack him early. That's why Naniwa will never amount to anything in GSL where you have time to prepare against your opponent unless he changes the way he plays.
who the hell cares whose fault it is. theyre still all in games which he complained about ..
|
Lol Leenock didn't even break a sweat.
|
Polt wasn't paying attention =/
He could have focused down 2 of the banes before they reached the bunkers
|
Lord_J
Kenya1085 Posts
Leenock: he's pretty good.
|
Norway25712 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:57 double620 wrote:
Officially, Mc is the best toss in this tournament.
Well, he is the only toss left.
|
Who would've thought that the race with the most hard to scout cheeses and all ins would do well in a Bo1 format. Shocking!
|
On December 13 2011 20:53 Zannadar wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:51 Seiniyta wrote:
Fucking fucking fucking fucking ridicilous, I mean, come on. How the fuck could Naniwa properly have scouted that? Naniwa defended well, but damn. I feel so sad for Naniwa. Hi, maybe go 2 gate robo before you expand? Or kindly send a probe first instead of greedily going for eco.
The only thing that bothers me about this statement is how P is supposed to play 'standard' and not greedy yet a T can expand very safely without going siege tank expand (ie 2rax fac). Hell, 1rax no gas vs P is arguably safer than 1gate FE vs T and it's still greedier.
I don't really think this is a balance problem (winrate wise I mean) I just think it's a design flaw.
|
On December 13 2011 20:53 eericson000 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:52 Shikyo wrote:
By the way that build is incredibly easy to defeat if you just build like 15-20 Zealots and amove them along with the stalkers That's if Nani knew what was happening a lot earlier.
Yes. When you see Marine/SCV a Toss goes "lol" and builds Sentries. When a Toss player's next sighting of the army includes 2 Thors leading the charge things tend to go south very, very fast. Naniwa actually played like a boss considering the circumstances.
|
On December 13 2011 20:55 Lowell wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:53 Zannadar wrote:On December 13 2011 20:51 Seiniyta wrote:
Fucking fucking fucking fucking ridicilous, I mean, come on. How the fuck could Naniwa properly have scouted that? Naniwa defended well, but damn. I feel so sad for Naniwa. Hi, maybe go 2 gate robo before you expand? Or kindly send a probe first instead of greedily going for eco. And then lose to 1 rax fe. Or to a tank marine push (you need a very early expo to have a chance to hold that).
I really hate the people who suggest 2 gate robo as the safe opening, implying others are greedy. 1gate FE or Nexus first even are quite good builds and aren't greedy in all scenarios. You're almost forced to all-in if you scout a 1rax FE with a 2gate robo observer before expand build, and 1rax FE is a standard build.
|
wow great decision by leenock.
|
Leenock is so frikkin' good. MVP vs Leenock finals I'm calling it.
|
sick defense by leenock wow
|
On December 13 2011 20:57 double620 wrote:
Officially, Mc is the best toss in this tournament.
Yep, not even close
|
On December 13 2011 20:56 Horseballs wrote:
On the subject of TvP allins I have this to say: take a look at protoss lategame, and then ask yourself why terrans are so eager to end the game early.
Protoss is weaker early game but stronger in the late game.
|
On December 13 2011 20:55 synaptik wrote:
naniwa 0-3 in blizzard cup
never wins a game in gsl
i guess korea just really shows how overrated this kid is
He played well, just not well enough against some of the best Koreans.
I definitely think he could do well in Code A, even place in Code S if he improved even slightly. His biggest set-back is that he always plays econ-risky and doesn't scout well enough to support it.
|
How many banes do you need to kill a rax?
|
Lol, Leenock top 3 Drone control.
|
On December 13 2011 20:51 Scila wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:50 Flanq wrote:
Gotta love watching back to back 1-base all-ins against the only protoss. Sick as shit yo!
/sarcasm Maybe if Protoss wasn't so damn strong in the late game... :/ I don't blame anyone for trying to kill Protoss quickly, they get considerably stronger the more high tech units they get.
It's been crazy fucked up openings in all matchups from the terrans today. Very sad to see
|
On December 13 2011 20:56 mlevar wrote:
I don't think Bruce Leenock can pull through this one
I'm never doubting Bruce again.
|
Leenock like a boss. So cool how he knew exactly how to handle that. So standard like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
