[IPL TAC] Quantic IM vs. Team Liquid (Day 4) - Page 19
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
| ||
Attilanator
United States154 Posts
![]() | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:24 Olinimm wrote: Too bad they didn't sign up as oGs/TL that would've been cool. Yeah, in a way, but on the other hand these players can and should play a lot better than this. | ||
TooN
1046 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:24 schaf wrote: i always thought 6 minute evo chamber was standard -.- Actually you should have about 60 drones by the 6 minute mark. Jesting aside, it is disappointing to see Liquid flop like this. Hero might stop the all kill but this is basically done for Liquid. | ||
aintz
Canada5624 Posts
| ||
Ruscour
5233 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
![]() | ||
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:26 TooN wrote: I don't wanna knock teamliquid, but I feel their lineup is as strong anymore One weak performance doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things. The only thing I would take from this is SaSe having a good day/his opponents having bad days. Not that SaSe isn't a good player - he certainly is, but to infer that the entire lineup of TL isn't that strong based off of a single weak performance is a little silly IMO. | ||
NipponBanzai
Canada518 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:28 HolyArrow wrote: One weak performance doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things. The only thing I would take from this is SaSe having a good day/his opponents having bad days. Not that SaSe isn't a good player - he certainly is, but to infer that the entire lineup of TL isn't that strong based off of a single weak performance is a little silly IMO. All 4 players that played for tl are having a bad day. Makes sense! ![]() | ||
aviator116
United States820 Posts
| ||
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:28 HolyArrow wrote: One weak performance doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things. The only thing I would take from this is SaSe having a good day/his opponents having bad days. Not that SaSe isn't a good player - he certainly is, but to infer that the entire lineup of TL isn't that strong based off of a single weak performance is a little silly IMO. True but it is a fair point when Hero seems to be the only one doing well recently, with Ret and Sheth to a lesser extent occasionally having decent runs. | ||
ptbl
United States6074 Posts
| ||
VoirDire
Sweden1923 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:25 Sc2Null wrote: the normal timing of a evo chamber in zvp is 6:40..tilt? Yes. But ret clearly expected Sase to FE and got a 3rd hatch before 2nd queen. When he saw that sase didn't FE he had to get emergency speed and roach warren just in case sase attacked. He didn't have time to drone up or tech and sase used that timing to do a DT rush. | ||
![]()
Porcelina
United Kingdom3249 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:24 aviator116 wrote: LOL so true haha and its sad that huk and puma can both beat hero somewhat consistently (MLGs, NASL) T__T Wait what? Three last tournaments, HuK is 50/50 in matches, Puma is 33/67. I would personally favour HuK in general vs Hero and possibly also Puma, though in neither case due to skill level alone. On the other hand, it is really grating to listen to commentators you do not really agree with or whose analysis is not spot on when the players you are rooting for are losing. Most of the time it is alright if no personal sentiment is invested, but it becomes monumentally more annoying when things are not at all going your way. Spider senses are tingling at the thought of a SaSe all kill. PvP on Tal'Darim...hmms. | ||
Olinimm
1471 Posts
| ||
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
aviator116
United States820 Posts
NOO HEROOO | ||
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
astroorion
United States1022 Posts
| ||
| ||