EPTDreamHack Winter 2011 Day 3 - Page 481
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
| ||
|
Denar
France1633 Posts
| ||
|
vectorix108
United States4633 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
|
Chicane
United States7875 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
FLEX THOSE MUSCLES CUTE TOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS! | ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
LR threads why are you so silly? | ||
|
thirnaz
Sweden876 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37101 Posts
As I've previously stated before, yes, build wise it was a 1-1-1. But his unit composition did not define what a 1-1-1 is. A 1-1-1 heavily focuses on marines to be able to fight back toss if they go early stalker pressure or phoenixes. PuMa had 1 bunker with 4 marines. | ||
|
Lukeeze[zR]
Switzerland6838 Posts
| ||
|
coolyou
United States958 Posts
| ||
|
ceaRshaf
Romania4926 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
| ||
|
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
| ||
|
stfouri
Finland272 Posts
| ||
|
hasuterrans
United States614 Posts
On November 27 2011 08:12 Seeker wrote: I never said nor acted like 1-1-1 was impossible to counter. Don't go putting words in my mouth. And build wise? Yes, that was 1-1-1. Unit composition wise? Not 1-1-1. That's what I'm trying to get across He got banshee, marine, tank, raven. That's clearly a 1-1-1 unit comp... | ||
|
BilltownRunner
United States229 Posts
 come on!less cheese more macro go puma | ||
|
shenkey
Slovenia117 Posts
we want to watch macro games not shit like this | ||
|
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
Game is pretty much over. | ||
| ||
