EPTOn November 26 2011 18:56 Weson wrote:
Well now my predictions went straight up the ass.
Well now my predictions went straight up the ass.
The best kind of prediction.
DreamHack Winter 2011 Day 3 - Page 20
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
SecondChance
Australia603 Posts
The best kind of prediction. | ||
|
Giriath
Sweden2412 Posts
| ||
|
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:56 LittLeD wrote: -____________-: why wouldnt he play what obviously works? Jesus people.... He attacked with a max army and won, bloody cheeser, waaah It's a TL LR thread with White Ra being eliminated and a Terran beating a Protoss, kind of standard comment | ||
|
Xanatoss
Germany539 Posts
| ||
|
Nick3
513 Posts
| ||
|
Dartego
154 Posts
 | ||
|
Reggiegigas
234 Posts
I met the guy too, discussed special tactics and everything. I love him so much | ||
|
zedi
165 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:56 Hall0wed wrote: Ugh, Naama will just get crushed by whoever his next opponent is. White-ra would have been entertaining atleast. Really doubt that. | ||
|
JohnMatrix
France1359 Posts
| ||
|
rushian
United Kingdom568 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:58 Dartego wrote: This dreamhack is full of upsets. It's much more exciting that way. It's not fun when the favorite wins every game | ||
|
Deindar
United States302 Posts
A legit strategy... yes. That said, there's a reason Naama doesn't play "standard." It's because "standard" takes skill and decision making. His "legit strategy" was a gimmicky all-in that won him a game against a vastly better player not because he played well, but because his build completely surprised White-Ra. Of course White-Ra could have played much better and won the game, but it's just a testament to how good Naama's all-in build was that he managed to take a series off a player of such a higher caliber. | ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7997 Posts
| ||
|
Velicia
United Kingdom32 Posts
| ||
|
Tarotis
Germany1931 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:58 rushian wrote: What's with the Naama hate? Is there something else to it other than people parroting what tastosis say? I thought he played well in those games Dont forget that he is the reigning dreamhack winter champion!! | ||
|
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:56 Hall0wed wrote: Ugh, Naama will just get crushed by whoever his next opponent is. White-ra would have been entertaining atleast. Quoting this for later when Nightend gets knocked out. In other news, god damn the music for dreamhack between games is immense. Okay interviews, top 5 plays etc are better than just music but this is so much better than generic rock song #38 | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:58 Xanatoss wrote: These Games just support my opinion that even a single banshee justifies a Stargate for even a single Phoenix. Unless T does a Timing right after the first Banshee which abuses the Stargates Opportunity costs, the prevented Eco-Damage and regained Mapcontroll are indeed worth it. to clarify - a single CLOAKED banshee; factoring in the opportunity-cost of cloak, it's highly likely T will not stop at one banshee; and if you plan on taking a 3rd, you can indeed defend more cost efficiently with 1-2 phoenixes; whitera handled that plain terribly, he even left his mineral lines completely undefended repeatedly; you never, ever, ever see this from, say, terran defendin vs mutas | ||
halvorg
Norway717 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:58 Giriath wrote: I didn't watch early game, but how did Naama cheese? Because he had cloaked banshees in his composition? Sounds like ladder amateurs crying. First game he did a 2 base all in after killing white-ra's warp prism + 2 immortals doing barely any damage followed by White-Ra going 2 base high templar into double expand. Second game he went cloak banshee expand, made a bio force and expanded again while pushing. Don't see it as cheese myself, but artosis is paid for his commentary so what do I know? : ) [edit: oops thought it was 2-0, only watched game 2 and 3.] | ||
| ||
