|
699 Posts
|
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA?
|
On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA?
yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait
|
How many of these are going to be forfeits?
It would be dumb for IdrA/Huk to actually play. They should both forfeit. If they take the 8th and 10th seed... they won't play each other in round 1. If they both play and one of them wins while the other loses, they face each other in round 1 (not good for EG). Anyways, if they both lose they know their round 1 opponent (IdrA vs. Strelok; Huk vs. Hasu). Those are 2 MUs both of them are very comfortable with.
Basically, point of my post, how many of these matches are going to be a forfeit?
|
On November 23 2011 05:41 ChuCky.Ca wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA? yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait
So is the NASL Website wrong?
4-way ties (and we do have one of those) will be determined by a Bo1 bracket
|
What about Demuslim vs. Puma?
On November 23 2011 06:05 VirgilSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 05:41 ChuCky.Ca wrote:On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA? yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait So is the NASL Website wrong? Show nested quote +4-way ties (and we do have one of those) will be determined by a Bo1 bracket
I hope you didn't actually fall for that.
|
On November 23 2011 05:41 ChuCky.Ca wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA? yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait
I Hope this is a joke... Theyre just doing round robbins right?
|
|
|
On November 23 2011 06:14 sjschmidt93 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 05:41 ChuCky.Ca wrote:On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA? yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait I Hope this is a joke... Theyre just doing round robbins right?
It was a joke.
For S1 they created a 4-man single elimination bracket (don't remember if it was BO1 or BO3). But they will almost certainly do the same thing here.
EDIT: OP says BO1.
|
I didn't know that they had changed the system from top 2 in every group advancing.
Was confused to see Hasu (3rd place in his group) there for a while.
|
Yea grand finals seeding seems to be all sorts of screwed up. HerO is obviously #1 (he was 7-0) so no arguments there. But DeMusliM and PuMa were both 6-1 (12-4) but he's listed as 9th while demuslim is 2nd. There should be a tiebreaker there for 2nd/3rd shouldn't there :S
Honestly the seeding in both places (here and that thread) seems off to me. Unless the standings in liquipedia are wrong..
|
On November 23 2011 06:25 Bobster wrote:
I didn't know that they had changed the system from top 2 in every group advancing.
Was confused to see Hasu (3rd place in his group) there for a while.
It is top 2 in every group... Hasu was 2nd in his group.
Going into the last week he was third at the time, but he was guaranteed to make top 2 because dimaga/puma (1st and 2nd at the time) were facing each other. One of them had to drop to third.
|
Yeah I'm looking at the standings page on NASL.tv and it's not consistent with what's going on here and in the NASL Grand Finals thread.
Someone from NASL swoop in and tell us which of the three is correct.
edit: NASL.tv was the culprit!
|
On November 23 2011 06:29 DoomsVille wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 06:25 Bobster wrote:
I didn't know that they had changed the system from top 2 in every group advancing.
Was confused to see Hasu (3rd place in his group) there for a while. It is top 2 in every group... Hasu was 2nd in his group. Going into the last week he was third at the time, but he was guaranteed to make top 2 because dimaga/puma (1st and 2nd at the time) were facing each other. One of them had to drop to third.
Oh, ok. NASL.tv still has Hasu in 3rd place so I assumed that was correct.
Should've known to look at Liquipedia for the most accurate and up to date info. :p
|
according to liquipedia the standings i got are:
1 - Hero; 7-0; 14-2
2/3 - Puma/Demuslim; 6-1; 12-4
4/5 - Sen/Morrow; 6-1; 12-5
6/7 - Idra/Hasu; 5-2; 12-5/11-4 (7 games over 50% W/L)
8 - BratOk; 5-2; 12-6
9/10 - Huk/Strelok; 5-2; 11-6/10-5 (5 games over 50% W/L)
so this thread has the correct match ups just the wrong seed numbers. Also, it's missing the Puma vs Demuslim match up. i didn't bother checking the playoff seeding.
|
On November 23 2011 06:28 DoomsVille wrote:Yea grand finals seeding seems to be all sorts of screwed up. HerO is obviously #1 (he was 7-0) so no arguments there. But DeMusliM and PuMa were both 6-1 (12-4) but he's listed as 9th while demuslim is 2nd. There should be a tiebreaker there for 2nd/3rd shouldn't there :S Honestly the seeding in both places (here and that thread) seems off to me. Unless the standings in liquipedia are wrong..
fairly sure the original thread listed names based purely on the order results were coming in.
|
hmm. i guess morrow will play terran. you might consider correcting it. Other than that, awesome games coming up. sen vs morrow. hell yeah. idra hasu. fuck yeah.
e: how awesome would a FFA actually be. I mean, who wouldn't watch that? seriously.
|
The players listed on the thread is not their actual seeding. Seeding works this way:
1st place in the groups are seeded 1-5... 2nd places are seeded 6-10.
This is why PuMa has a higher seed than DeMusliM despite them having the same record and points. Hope this makes sense~
|
On November 23 2011 06:07 Dexington wrote:What about Demuslim vs. Puma? Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 06:05 VirgilSC2 wrote:On November 23 2011 05:41 ChuCky.Ca wrote:On November 23 2011 05:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:
So is Jinro vs Moonglade vs Cruncher vs Cloud gonna be a 4 way FFA? yes it is that's confirmed open allying as well cant wait So is the NASL Website wrong? 4-way ties (and we do have one of those) will be determined by a Bo1 bracket I hope you didn't actually fall for that.
Considering NASL has provided wrong information before, I wouldn't have been surprised.
|
Who will be playing Thorzain in the grand finals?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SGnmu.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1698.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1588.jpg)
DarKFoRcE vs 
NightEnD (11th and 12th seeds)![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1314.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1602.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2254.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1610.jpg)
Jinro vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2335.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1825.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1233.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1212.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1176.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1587.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/600.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1598.jpg)
vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1152.jpg)
