|
Watch how you approach the topic of match fixing. You can speculate, saying "I'm not so sure about the finals, something doesn't sit right with me," but if you are going to outright accuse players of match fixing you need something more than your word.
TL takes match fixing/abuse seriously and as such there is a burden a proof when you are accusing players.
- p4NDemik |
On October 23 2011 08:56 Cain0 wrote: Terran timing attacks are far too strong. Everytime nestea does one its undefendable. As the series goes to the final game.....
|
On October 23 2011 08:58 Krehlmar wrote: I love clan IM and MVP/NesTea but I really REALLY hate how MVP playes against NesTea... always rushes, never macrogames. Always that kind of terran play that makes me go "yugh that's so godamn cheap" like mass marine/tanks early etc.
Except the game where MVP outmacro'd Nestea on Daybreak, getting his 4th base before nestea, a zerg...
|
On October 23 2011 08:59 Elean wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2011 08:57 Ubes wrote:On October 23 2011 08:57 zeru wrote:On October 23 2011 08:56 Cain0 wrote: Terran timing attacks are far too strong. Everytime nestea does one its undefendable. Nestea is just too greedy lol. MVP is playing godly Seriously gtfo, this timing is amazing it's WP by MVP go QQ elsewhere. If Nestea is able to engage that in the middled of the map he crushes it. Yeah, sure if Nestea had map control he would have won. Unfortunately there were 4 helions in the way. You can make Lings and kill 4 red flame hellions/scare them away
|
|
On October 23 2011 09:00 Flipshy wrote:![[image loading]](http://memegenerator.net/cache/instances/400x/10/10578/10831934.jpg)
LMAO! You really made my day!
|
On October 23 2011 08:58 Krehlmar wrote: I love clan IM and MVP/NesTea but I really REALLY hate how MVP playes against NesTea... always rushes, never macrogames. Always that kind of terran play that makes me go "yugh that's so godamn cheap" like mass marine/tanks early etc. You are seriously saying that MVP is uncomfortable in a macro game? It's a timing attack, not an all-in. Nestea wasn't prepared, so he lost...
|
On October 23 2011 09:00 HwangjaeTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2011 08:58 woob wrote:On October 23 2011 08:57 HwangjaeTerran wrote: I wonder if they have been instructed not to use their gamer handles. You know, it's kinda nerdy......Day[9]. nerdy? its blizzcon World of Kung Fu Panda and Diablo with Tits.. how's that nerdy?
Do you really need to be told Sean?
|
The 2 best players in the world right here, apologies to MMA
|
On October 23 2011 09:00 Jampackedeon wrote: What is the game count right now? I don't know what the buffer is for coming from the winner vs the losers bracket.
They're 3-3 in what's effectively become a BO7.
|
Ill tell you how this game will go.
MVP builds 4-6 hellions Then goes into marine tanks Attacks around 8:30 minutes and its a "genius" timing window that always seems to be open.
|
ok this sean thing kinda getting into my nerves.
|
On October 23 2011 09:00 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Blizzcon worst SC2 tournament of 2011, agreed anyone? MLG Dallas.
|
On October 23 2011 08:58 Krehlmar wrote: I love clan IM and MVP/NesTea but I really REALLY hate how MVP playes against NesTea... always rushes, never macrogames. Always that kind of terran play that makes me go "yugh that's so godamn cheap" like mass marine/tanks early etc. Playing against a macro Zerg without applying hard pressure is borderline idiotic. Bomber showed us that against IdrA and NesTea (in the ST).
|
|
On October 23 2011 09:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2011 08:59 gruff wrote:On October 23 2011 08:57 Femari wrote:On October 23 2011 08:54 Juvant wrote:On October 23 2011 08:54 Femari wrote:On October 23 2011 08:53 Adreme wrote:On October 23 2011 08:52 Femari wrote:On October 23 2011 08:51 Hier wrote: I don't get it, what's the score? OP says 2:0 MVP Liquipedia says 1:0 MVP Stream says 1:0 Nestea Nestea 2-0'd Mvp in WBF Mvp 2-0'd Nestea in the first Bo3 Nestea is up 1-0 in the second Bo3 Yes. It's a horrible format. Its the standard format for double elimination tournaments that the guy from the losers bracket has to win 2 Bo3s. Doesn't mean it's not horrible. Should the person who didn't lose a single Bo3 not be rewarded somehow? By punishing the player who has already been punished just to get to the finals? You do understand how double elimination works right? Lose two Bo3's and your out, it's fairly simple, but IMO a Bo5 would be better then Nestea doesn't get the benifit of double elim
|
Listening to the intro, Day9 getting everyone to be superquiet, so damn good at talking to the crowd, and the JP comes, not a single emotion -.-
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On October 23 2011 09:00 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2011 09:00 Drazerk wrote:On October 23 2011 08:59 Drazerk wrote:On October 23 2011 08:59 Drazerk wrote:Game Three on Shakuras Plateau In the Top left is  MVP While in the top right is  Nestea 1:40barracks in production for MVP 2:10hatch first from nestea MVP getting his gas 3:00Pool and gas on the way for nestea as MVP gets his orbital
4:00
Factory on the way for MVP as he places a bunker at the natural
|
|
Day9 has been in a finals in a final game with this many people watching?
Doubt it highly.
|
On October 23 2011 08:58 Krehlmar wrote: I love clan IM and MVP/NesTea but I really REALLY hate how MVP playes against NesTea... always rushes, never macrogames. Always that kind of terran play that makes me go "yugh that's so godamn cheap" like mass marine/tanks early etc.
lol? MVP has crushed Nestea many many times in macro games. If you want to blame somebody then blame blizzard for shitty map selection.
|
|
|
|