If you don't know how to post in a live report thread by now, be advised: don't whine about game balance and don't bash players/casters/interviewers/staff/other posters. We are monitoring this thread closely.
Stop with the USA USA chant shit. Further offenses beyond page 493 will be met with bans. You've been warned.
On October 10 2011 02:10 ravemir wrote: Just realized something really obvious: Banelings are the only unit in the game where the killcount rank doesn't matter at all xD
LOL Artosis removed his tweet about cheering for Ret and Greg. I tweeted him 10 mins ago to stop cursing them. Probably got fed up with the complaining
I basically want to quote this to make sure more people see it.
It's a bo loss when you do something ridiculous. If ZvZ were all about BO wins and losses, nestea wouldn't have a 90% winrate in ZvZ. Just because you make a greedy decision, it gets scouted, and the other person tries to kill you, doesn't make it a BO loss. It makes a greedy play loss.
If i went Hatch first into pool on 25, and i lost to 14/14, that'd be a BO loss.
It'd also be a ridiculously greedy loss.
Stop pretending that ZvZ is the coinflip matchup you want it to be, so you can explain away losses easily.
I challenge anyone who watched Stephano's ZvZ to claim it's a coinflip. He takes people apart. Just because most pro zergs don't know how to play the match up doesn't make it a coinflip.
On October 10 2011 02:10 ravemir wrote: Just realized something really obvious: Banelings are the only unit in the game where the killcount rank doesn't matter at all xD
How about for Overlords.
You have a point, but Banelings can actually kill a load of units during their short lifespan...
On October 10 2011 02:10 ravemir wrote: Just realized something really obvious: Banelings are the only unit in the game where the killcount rank doesn't matter at all xD
and broodlings.... and infested terran....
Actually those units can get kills before they die so their kill count can go up beyond 0.