|
On October 07 2011 03:54 Yamulo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 03:52 Olinim wrote:
3/3 carriers and voids...did stephano have a single air upgrade? Every time I see a PvZ I feel the toss is playing from behind. Nope no air upgrades.
He had 3 attack.... and from what I can tell at least had one armor.
I dont understand why Huk went carriers. Besides delaying him getting a huge army(big build time), you only transition to carriers if they dont have a significant corrupter count.
He should've just gone mass ground army with high templar or something. Stephano was forced to spend all his resources into infestors(no mins, only 3k gas.) Huk was in a bad position anyway and was down supply for the majority of the game.
Don't complain about imbalance when players make dumb decisions, like going carrier against mass corrupter or forgoing high templar or getting fungaled.
|
Huk did an Inca build PvZ, old build doing what it has always done.
|
On October 07 2011 03:56 Hemula wrote:
Is there a restream in low quality? My internet connection cant handle qulaity this high...
http://twitch.tv/ignproleague
With 240p?
|
Did Huk manually stop his Mothership when fungaled? I thought they don't stun massive units?
|
How can you say that anyone is not taking these games seriously, 1k for first place is a prize pot for a medium sized tournament, it's 5 th place in MLG, come on guys...
|
On October 07 2011 03:55 LittLeD wrote:
Personally, I think Huk instead of making all the voids rays should've started with carriers right away after his beacon completed.
Carriers are actually really good vs zerg for anyone who's been following late game PvZ at all, you just need a critical amount of maybe 5+ of them.
Stop the freaking whining
mana has been using carriers for a while and yeah they are a good unit. And I agree, Huk should ahve either stuck with VRs or make Carriers from the beginning. I still think he needed HTs to deal with the Infestors
|
On October 07 2011 03:56 CutthroatCollapse wrote:
Man, Vegas sure seems to love e sports, sc2 in particular. The venue seems to be packed
It's in New Jersey. There's more than one Caesar's Palace
|
this stream is at least 60fps, my fraps wont show higher because of my monitor
not bad...
|
You tell him doa. I dislike how everyone calls any proxy rax a makarax. A makarax is very specific.
|
|
|
I really like these casters, surprisingly.
|
gordonhayward is the next b-word. there i said it first.
|
LorangerChris Chris Loranger
@
@FXOtgun .... ur a joke
lol
|
Not sure if Huk was experimenting or trying to demonstrate that you can't really use late game carriers/mship against zerg. Both Terran and Zerg have viable late game compositions, but not toss.
He said in the pre-tourney interview he wasn't taking the group play that seriously. He might have also been not wanting to show his real prep for late game PvZ and save it for the bracket that counts.
|
I don't understand the idea behind having a player play two consecutive series head to tail like this. I only watched the last game, and I'm too tired to play. Stephano? He actually did all the work.. must be damn tired.
|
GORDON HAYWARD WON!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOO!!!!
|
bah, sorry for balance whine this is just jokes to me...
stephano is a total beast and i mean to take nothing away from him i just wish carriers had a use in the fucking game and fungal didnt auto win almost every battle ever.
|
On October 07 2011 03:53 Elefanto wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 03:53 Roggay wrote:On October 07 2011 03:50 LittLeD wrote:
That was one of the most amazing Showing I've seen from a european zerg in a looooooooong time.
jesus shitballs Honestly, I will wait for a more serious game before saying that. Don't get me wrong, Stephano is really good, but HuK went into showmatch mode. Yeah, i mean, who wants 1k bugs, pffff.
You realize who you're talking to right?
|
On October 07 2011 03:55 humbre wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 03:52 Daray wrote:On October 07 2011 03:50 humbre wrote:On October 07 2011 03:47 pdd wrote:
Lol carriers are so hilariously bad. no they are not, corruptors are just insanely good against massive ships Kinda sucks that corruptors counter both of the protoss massive units :c have u ever seen terran building bc vs zerg (unless its for fun or to humiliate somebody) think it was tyler who said blizzard buffed corruptors so much to make them counter colo they totally fucked up battleships in the process
This is why you don't see carriers much either (also in PvT). Colossus force corruptors/vikings which also counter carriers so you can't really switch to that anymore.
|
On October 07 2011 03:54 Slardar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 03:47 darcevader88 wrote:
fucking carriers, so horrible
3/3 vs 0/0 corruptors and with fungals guess who wins?
this game is broken.. Are you kidding? Compare what you're saying vs 3/3 Carriers vs 0/0 Devourers + PLAGUHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
fuck devourers just mass Scourge!
Ahh how I miss the crazy bw caster screaming PLAYYYGGGGGUUUUUUUUUUUUU
:D
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
