Playhem $400 Open - Saturday September 24th - Page 2

On September 25 2011 06:16 Judgey wrote:
Anyone know if/where a bracket will be posted?

On September 25 2011 08:53 FLuE wrote:
Ha how are you going to play a best of 3, ask for advice after saying GG in the first game, ask for advice again at the start of the second game, and then not GG after losing?

Kudos to incontrol for even offering advice in the middle of a best of 3. Could you imagine a football coach walking up to an opposing football coach at halftime and going, "hey you should probably run to our right side more often we are weak there." GM from Inc.

On September 25 2011 08:57 Pandain wrote:



He didn't even want to give advice. I had to ask him AGAIN at the start of the game. Not to mention his arrogant tone with me "rofl yeah right" when really I had game 1 won through outplaying him, and then didn't make enough broodlords(which was admittedly my bad.)

The point is I didn't like his tone, which implied that he was far better than me and I was just stupid. He made his tone obvious. And when I feel I can hold up with him in a macro game, then fuck that.

And when your a pro of course people are going to look up to you. I did, and I asked him for advice. Personally if you don't have the time to give advice then :/.

And I didn't gg because I got dt rushed. I'm sorry if that angered me. Especially after his "superior" tone.

On September 25 2011 08:57 Pandain wrote:



He didn't even want to give advice. I had to ask him AGAIN at the start of the game. Not to mention his arrogant tone with me "rofl yeah right" when really I had game 1 won through outplaying him, and then didn't make enough broodlords(which was admittedly my bad.)

The point is I didn't like his tone, which implied that he was far better than me and I was just stupid. He made his tone obvious. And when I feel I can hold up with him in a macro game, then fuck that.

And when your a pro of course people are going to look up to you. I did, and I asked him for advice. Personally if you don't have the time to give advice then :/.

And I didn't gg because I got dt rushed. I'm sorry if that angered me. Especially after his "superior" tone.

On September 25 2011 09:01 _Mittens wrote:

WHAT?! Incontrol being an arrogant, all around douche bag looking down on everyone like he is Nestea? And doing bullshit DT play? Not the Incontrol I know...

wait...

On September 25 2011 09:03 iNcontroL wrote:


Want to know what actually happened?

You asked for advice at the end of a game after GG'ing. I couldn't tel if you were still palying or actually just asking for advice. You should leave, then ask between games. That is what is actually appropriate.

You asked again for advice and despite it being in the middle of a tourney game I took the time to oblige you. You disagreed with literally everything I said. You were "fine" on bases. You suicided the mutas cause you "had money to spend." And you made that many infesters just fine.. when you here admit it was bad (cause it was). After disagreeing with my advice despite asking for it I said "rofl ok" because who the fuck does that? Then you leave with no GG.

And no, despite killing a nexus and being annoying with lings you were never going to win game 1 because you aren't very good. You need to protect your expos from DT's and not suicide mutas / lings as much as you do. Your infesters were ALWAYS going to die whether you had 3-4 more broods or not. I had void rays coming off of 3 stargates and I had 4 bases vs your 5 with your army dead.

GG next time and less attitude plz.

On September 25 2011 09:03 iNcontroL wrote:


Want to know what actually happened?

You asked for advice at the end of a game after GG'ing. I couldn't tel if you were still palying or actually just asking for advice. You should leave, then ask between games. That is what is actually appropriate.

You asked again for advice and despite it being in the middle of a tourney game I took the time to oblige you. You disagreed with literally everything I said. You were "fine" on bases. You suicided the mutas cause you "had money to spend." And you made that many infesters just fine.. when you here admit it was bad (cause it was). After disagreeing with my advice despite asking for it I said "rofl ok" because who the fuck does that? Then you leave with no GG.

And no, despite killing a nexus and being annoying with lings you were never going to win game 1 because you aren't very good. You need to protect your expos from DT's and not suicide mutas / lings as much as you do. Your infesters were ALWAYS going to die whether you had 3-4 more broods or not. I had void rays coming off of 3 stargates and I had 4 bases vs your 5 with your army dead.

GG next time and less attitude plz.

On September 25 2011 09:09 Pandain wrote:


I disagreed with you on mutas and expos, because I had like 6 bases when you were on 3. If you honestly think I should have 8 somehow, and leave myself super open, then......

Mutalisks are debatable. I felt I was just getting you out of position and abusing you (as I did.) I only made a handful and they did enough damage with the probe deaths. Finally I wasn't going mass muta so the mutas weren't useful anyway and I would have to sacrifice them eventually. Unless you went to suggest I should've gone mass muta vs archon.....

I agree with you on support and infestors and brood lords. I didn't disagree there. You are taking it as if I was just like "help? SIKE YOUR WRONG." I was just wondering and offering my thoughts, contrary to your own tone.

And the only reason you won game 1 is because I made a mistake with army composition. NOT because of macro, or multitask, or micro, all of which I showed was superior. I lost one expo, but I don't think you even realized that I still had 5 other bases. I didn't need that expo. You just felt good by destroying it. And if I had more broods, since you had like no anti air they would've destroyed that army. Then I could've remaxed vs your void rays(and I even had corrupters still) to easily deal with you. AND I was taking out your fourth.