EPTMLG Raleigh Day 1 RED Live Report Thread - Page 497
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Obligatory public note for all large tournament threads: The following is a list of behaviors that will get immediate bans: 1. Whining about stream 2. Bashing other games 3. Flaming other users 4. Bashing players 5. Complaining about imbalance. It is in no way complete. Keep in mind that there's a difference between pointing out that the SC2 and CoD streams were switched and whining about it (same thing on pointing out/asking about stream lag and whining about it, etc.). Also, just because you post something and aren't immediately banned for it doesn't mean you won't get caught. We'll be going through this thread very carefully. That being said, enjoy today's games! Time stamp: page 38, 6:23. | ||
|
RusHXceL
United States1004 Posts
| ||
|
Zeroxk
Norway1244 Posts
On August 27 2011 21:10 Corsica wrote: Who else here thinks that MLG should bring only top code A players. Coca was top 8 not so long ago, so we will see korean damnation again. We should equalize the competition. Only Code A playas. Well DRG is Code A... | ||
|
KaiserJohan
Sweden1808 Posts
| ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On August 27 2011 22:09 TBO wrote: Does anyone knows how Extended Series works with "did not shows"? In the MLG game list, the result is 0-0 not 2-0... It's a 2-0 lead in the extended series which is absolutely fucking retarded, this happened with White-ra but his opponent suicided twice to make it an even series. It's completely idiotic that you can get a lead over a player you never faced, if your opponent is a no-show your advantage is getting a Bye and not having to play the series to advance, the extended series rule is meant to maintain fairness so someone doesn't advance over someone else without having a better head-to-head record against them, but if they never fucking played then they should start at 0-0. | ||
|
gerundium
Netherlands786 Posts
On August 27 2011 22:37 Mordiford wrote: It's a 2-0 lead in the extended series which is absolutely fucking retarded, this happened with White-ra but his opponent suicided twice to make it an even series. It's completely idiotic that you can get a lead over a player you never faced, if your opponent is a no-show your advantage is getting a Bye and not having to play the series to advance, the extended series rule is meant to maintain fairness so someone doesn't advance over someone else without having a better head-to-head record against them, but if they never fucking played then they should start at 0-0. this opens up a huge loophole and i'm amazed you don't see it. if i am going up against an opponent i win against a very small percentage of the time it's possibly in my advantage to be a no-show and get a level playing field against him later on instead of facing him. now that's idiotic. | ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On August 27 2011 22:45 gerundium wrote: this opens up a huge loophole and i'm amazed you don't see it. if i am going up against an opponent i win against a very small percentage of the time it's possibly in my advantage to be a no-show and get a level playing field against him later on instead of facing him. now that's idiotic. You have to play a ton more games if you lose, you'd have to go through a large number of players for avoiding one and in the current system, you would entirely miss pool play when going through the open bracket. On top of that, you'd still have to face them later(in your given example) so you aren't avoiding anything. I can't think of a single situation where intentionally no-showing would be worth it. | ||
|
mprs
Canada2933 Posts
Purposefully bring worse players? Yup I sure hope so. I know people in LA were begging to have NJ Nets games aired instead of the Lakers... | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On August 27 2011 22:45 gerundium wrote: this opens up a huge loophole and i'm amazed you don't see it. if i am going up against an opponent i win against a very small percentage of the time it's possibly in my advantage to be a no-show and get a level playing field against him later on instead of facing him. now that's idiotic. you're really trying too hard | ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
On August 27 2011 22:45 gerundium wrote: this opens up a huge loophole and i'm amazed you don't see it. if i am going up against an opponent i win against a very small percentage of the time it's possibly in my advantage to be a no-show and get a level playing field against him later on instead of facing him. now that's idiotic. If you just play them you play him, and then some opponents in winner's. If you throw the game you play a ton of opponents in losers and then him, possibly with a handicap if he won winner's. How is that an advantage? | ||
|
Volband
Hungary6034 Posts
On August 27 2011 21:10 Corsica wrote: Who else here thinks that MLG should bring only top code A players. Coca was top 8 not so long ago, so we will see korean damnation again. We should equalize the competition. Only Code A playas. If you want to watch Code A caliber players, go watch Code A (I'm doing it as well from time to time). But at MLG, I want the bests, because... well... who the hell doesn't want to want the bests? I don't care if they are dominating and/or constantly reach top 6. MLG is a high-level StarCraft II competiotion, not some "try to make foreigners look good" act. Terrible suggestion. | ||
|
drcatellino
Canada346 Posts
| ||
|
Rhedsa
Costa Rica594 Posts
| ||
|
iNbluE
Switzerland674 Posts
| ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
On August 27 2011 23:20 iNbluE wrote: Is it possible to find VODs from the first day already? Maybe the thing where you can scroll the stream back if you had it up in running? Not sure how people are just now watching games from yesterday. I'm interested in knowing if that's possible while I wait for the stream to start  | ||
|
Rhedsa
Costa Rica594 Posts
| ||
|
Thezzphai
Germany1145 Posts
On August 27 2011 23:17 Volband wrote: If you want to watch Code A caliber players, go watch Code A (I'm doing it as well from time to time). But at MLG, I want the bests, because... well... who the hell doesn't want to want the bests? I don't care if they are dominating and/or constantly reach top 6. MLG is a high-level StarCraft II competiotion, not some "try to make foreigners look good" act. Terrible suggestion. To kind of equalize the competition I think more top European players should consider coming to MLG. No offense to the other players of course but it seems like there's a lack of European players especially this MLG. Mouz should really consider sending someone, I'd love to see MaNa and MorroW there and iirc MorroW has been at an MLG before. | ||
|
futsel
163 Posts
too bad I've missed NaDa vs Ret games | ||
|
KaRath_
Australia245 Posts
| ||
|
DeG3n
Germany130 Posts
On August 27 2011 23:54 Thezzphai wrote: To kind of equalize the competition I think more top European players should consider coming to MLG. No offense to the other players of course but it seems like there's a lack of European players especially this MLG. Mouz should really consider sending someone, I'd love to see MaNa and MorroW there and iirc MorroW has been at an MLG before. I think so too, but I also think that sending a player to MLG wouldn't be really worth it, beacuse nobody can really deliver truely great results after fighting through the open bracket. MLG's system just causes more and more koreans participating, while the good foreigners, who aren't already seeded into poolplay, keep avoiding traveling to MLG. This results to a lack of represantation of the european scene. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9056 Posts
| ||
| ||
