|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On August 16 2011 14:22 DrNK.Zeal wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:21 backtoback wrote:On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote:
It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game. you dumb? HuK Overextended with those bunkers and losing such a huge lead. He had that if he just teched and sat back Yea its fair how easy it is to come back after a huge blunder as terran where as protoss you're so fragile that if you pretty much make the exact same blunder as terran you lose
HuK lost a helluva lot more gas heavy units in his attacks. He lost all his sentries, immortals and barely escaped with some stalkers. Losing marine/marauder isn't really comparable to that.
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 Dfgj wrote:
Huk lost his immortals, sentries, zealots, and most of his stalkers, while delaying his third and tech for the push - and bomber got his medivacs out.
You can't complain about Huk losing the game after that.
it was a gut decision after he killed bombers push but bomber separated the bunkers nicely and pulled like 20 scvs to mass repair and even then he BARELY held it, decent try by huk.
|
Yay GOGO BOMBER FIGHTING!!
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 HuKPOWA wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:22 Velicia wrote:On August 16 2011 14:20 vict1019 wrote:
Camera flipped o.O, anyway love seeing the 6gate all in fail :D. Bomber tricking him out saying he was going for an ultra long game. Please explain to me what part of that game was 6 gate all in. Same...kinda confused how having 2 bases still making probes...and going for another expansion was an all in...
The part where he had a robo facility and twilight council researching charge, maybe.
|
LOL that mvpviolet voice thingy LOL
|
I don't get calling someones macro good. It's not particularly hard to macro with any of the races, it wasn't that Bomber's macro was good (cause anything less than fan-fucking-tastic is unacceptable at that level) but rather that Huk macroed poorly by poor use of chrono
|
all you can complain about from that game is how bunkers are almost free, so almost no need to worry about making too many just to feel safe, saw it twice that game
|
On August 16 2011 14:21 doihy wrote:
well since huk tweeted looks like he is in a good mood... he probably made it in second place.
agreed. sounds like this
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 nvs. wrote:
I love how people complain about balance after HuK attacks into like 4 bunkers. -.-
I love how thats not nearly as bad as losing your WHOLE ARMY in the beginning of the game.
|
It's not even that Huk lost too much in that attack, it's that he lost every single key unit. 2 Immortals and 5-10 Sentries died, and all he took out was 2 bunkers.
|
Both Bomber and Huk could learn to tone down their aggression. Too much machismo in that game.
Anyways go Sangho!
|
wtf why is he talking about his goddamn watches so much
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 MenSol[ZerO] wrote:
huk 100% advances
only the player that doesn't win a match gets sent down
2 players advance to Ro16
1 player stays in code S but doesn't advance
1 player goes to up and down
He doesn't advance unless he wins; but he is guaranteed Code S still
|
On August 16 2011 14:23 Garnet wrote:
who are these girls?
a pink
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 HuKPOWA wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:22 Velicia wrote:On August 16 2011 14:20 vict1019 wrote:
Camera flipped o.O, anyway love seeing the 6gate all in fail :D. Bomber tricking him out saying he was going for an ultra long game. Please explain to me what part of that game was 6 gate all in. Same...kinda confused how having 2 bases still making probes...and going for another expansion was an all in...
I won't throw around the word all in, but he delayed tech and his 3rd for that attack he did. If it didn't do damage (which it didnt) HuK was in deep shit
|
so bomber loses whole army almost for free and then despite being so far behind he goes on to beat HuK's army without using 2 whole medivacs of units with him? Wow... I guess to explain this I have to assume that Bomber's macro is just waaayyyyy better than HuK's...
|
On August 16 2011 14:23 Shalaiyn wrote:
Wasnt SangHo's Artosis' room mate...?
Killer = SangHo
|
Problem is huk went to the rocks when he could have broke the front (imo)
|
Moletrap is a time guessing bonjwa
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 DrNK.Zeal wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:21 backtoback wrote:On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote:
It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game. you dumb? HuK Overextended with those bunkers and losing such a huge lead. He had that if he just teched and sat back Yea its fair how easy it is to come back after a huge blunder as terran where as protoss you're so fragile that if you pretty much make the exact same blunder as terran you lose
YEAH FORGETTING UPGRADES AND TECHING IS NOT A BLUNDER DERP DERP DERP
Seriously, Bomber out macroed, Huk didn't tech, that was game, wtf at derping vocal minority
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
